BACKGROUND: Abnormal neural response to reward is increasingly thought to function as a biological correlate of emerging psychopathology during adolescence. However, this view assumes such responses have good psychometric properties-especially internal consistency-an assumption that is rarely tested. METHODS: Internal consistency (i.e., spilt-half reliability) was calculated for event-related potentials (ERPs) and Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) responses to monetary gain and loss feedback from the same sample of 8-14 year-old females (n=177). Internal consistency for ERPs (i.e. feedback negativity) and BOLD responses within the ventral striatum and medial/lateral prefrontal cortex to gain, loss, difference scores (gain-loss), and residual scores (gain controlling for loss) were compared. Moderation analyses were conducted to investigate whether internal consistency differed by age. RESULTS: ERP and BOLD responses to gain and loss feedback showed high internal consistency in all regions (Spearman Brown Coefficients (SB) ≥ 0.70). When considering difference and residual scores, however, responses showed lower internal consistency (SBs ≤ 0.50), with particularly low internal consistency for subtraction-based scores (SB ≤ 0.36). Age was not a significant moderator of split-half relationships, indicating similar internal consistency across late childhood to early adolescence. CONCLUSIONS: Within the same subjects, high internal consistency was observed for both ERP and fMRI measures of response to gains and losses, which did not vary as a function of age. Moreover, excellent psychometric properties were evident even within the first half of the experiment. Difference scores were characterized by lower internal consistency, although regression-based approaches outperformed subtraction-based difference scores.
BACKGROUND: Abnormal neural response to reward is increasingly thought to function as a biological correlate of emerging psychopathology during adolescence. However, this view assumes such responses have good psychometric properties-especially internal consistency-an assumption that is rarely tested. METHODS: Internal consistency (i.e., spilt-half reliability) was calculated for event-related potentials (ERPs) and Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) responses to monetary gain and loss feedback from the same sample of 8-14 year-old females (n=177). Internal consistency for ERPs (i.e. feedback negativity) and BOLD responses within the ventral striatum and medial/lateral prefrontal cortex to gain, loss, difference scores (gain-loss), and residual scores (gain controlling for loss) were compared. Moderation analyses were conducted to investigate whether internal consistency differed by age. RESULTS:ERP and BOLD responses to gain and loss feedback showed high internal consistency in all regions (Spearman Brown Coefficients (SB) ≥ 0.70). When considering difference and residual scores, however, responses showed lower internal consistency (SBs ≤ 0.50), with particularly low internal consistency for subtraction-based scores (SB ≤ 0.36). Age was not a significant moderator of split-half relationships, indicating similar internal consistency across late childhood to early adolescence. CONCLUSIONS: Within the same subjects, high internal consistency was observed for both ERP and fMRI measures of response to gains and losses, which did not vary as a function of age. Moreover, excellent psychometric properties were evident even within the first half of the experiment. Difference scores were characterized by lower internal consistency, although regression-based approaches outperformed subtraction-based difference scores.
Authors: Katherine R Luking; David Pagliaccio; Joan L Luby; Deanna M Barch Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2016-02-02 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Michael M Plichta; Nenad Vasic; Robert Christian Wolf; Klaus-Peter Lesch; Dagmar Brummer; Christian Jacob; Andreas J Fallgatter; Georg Grön Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2008-08-21 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Erika E Forbes; Neal D Ryan; Mary L Phillips; Stephen B Manuck; Carol M Worthman; Donna L Moyles; Jill A Tarr; Samantha R Sciarrillo; Ronald E Dahl Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Richard J Macatee; Sarah A Okey; Brian J Albanese; Norman B Schmidt; Jesse R Cougle Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Victoria M Lawlor; Christian A Webb; Thomas V Wiecki; Michael J Frank; Madhukar Trivedi; Diego A Pizzagalli; Daniel G Dillon Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Daniel M Mackin; Roman Kotov; Greg Perlman; Brady D Nelson; Brandon L Goldstein; Greg Hajcak; Daniel N Klein Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2019-05
Authors: Brady D Nelson; Zachary P Infantolino; Daniel N Klein; Greg Perlman; Roman Kotov; Greg Hajcak Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2017-08-07
Authors: Autumn Kujawa; Ashley Carroll; Emma Mumper; Dahlia Mukherjee; Ellen M Kessel; Thomas Olino; Greg Hajcak; Daniel N Klein Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2017-11-04 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: Zachary P Infantolino; Katherine R Luking; Colin L Sauder; John J Curtin; Greg Hajcak Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 6.556