| Literature DB >> 29057128 |
Hugo Plascencia1, Álvaro Cruz2, Gerardo Gascón3, Beatriz Ramírez3, Mariana Díaz1.
Abstract
Usually, the mandibular canine only has one root and one root canal. However, there has been a noticeable increment in evidence showing variations in its morphology, such as the presence of two roots and two root canals. The aim of this article was to present a case of a mandibular canine with two roots and two root canals and to review the available literature on this anatomic variation. Root canal treatment of tooth #43 with such morphology was performed in a 47-year-old woman. Careful inspection of the preoperative radiograph indicated the presence of more than one canal. The 12-month follow-up showed normal periapical tissues, with no pain or tenderness. Literature review revealed that the overall prevalence of such root canal configuration is 5.7%, with a strong preference for female sex (87.5%). Although mandibular canines with two roots and two root canals are not common, clinicians should always anticipate the presence of possible variations. Therefore, timely diagnosis and meticulous exploration of such mandibular canines allow for planning of an individualized treatment protocol, tailored to their peculiar morphology, focused on avoiding excessive weakening or even perforation of the roots.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29057128 PMCID: PMC5616004 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8459840
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Dent
Figure 1(a) Preoperative radiograph shows sudden loss in the continuity of the canal and the presence of a groove in the outer part of the root (arrows). (b) Counterpart canine radiograph reveals typical root features. (c) Buccal access cavity due to dental giroversion. (d) Post-treatment radiograph. (e) 12-month follow-up radiograph shows normal periapical tissues.
Prevalence of mandibular canines with two roots and two root canals reported in clinical studies (n = 5 articles).
| Author/year | Materials and methods | Country | Number of mandibular canines ( | Root canal configuration | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type I (1) (%) | Prevalence of 2 apical foramina (%) | ||||
| Aminsobhani | CBCT | Iran | 608 | 71.8% | 19.8% |
| Altunsoy | CBCT | Turkey | 1604 | 92.7% | 3.9% |
| Han | CBCT | China | 1291 | 93.7% | 1.8% |
| da Silva | CBCT | Brazil | 200 | 90.5% | 4.5% |
| Soleymani | CBCT | Iran | 300 | 89.7% | 1% |
Vertucci's root canal configuration.
Prevalence of mandibular canines with two roots and two root canals reported in vitro/ex vivo studies (n = 13 articles).
| Author/year | Materials and methods | Country | Number of mandibular canines ( | Root canal configuration | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type I (1) (%) | Prevalence of 2 apical foramina's (%) | ||||
| Pineda and Kuttler 1972 [ | Periapical radiographs | Mexico | 187 | 81.5% | 5% |
| Green 1973 [ | Microscopic inspection of longitudinal sections | USA | 100 | 87% | 3% |
| Kerekes and Tronstad 1977 [ | Microscopic inspection of cross-sections | Norway | 20 | 90% | 10% |
| Hession 1977 [ | Periapical radiographs and contrast dye | Australia | 9 | 88.9% | 11.1% |
| Vertucci 1974 [ | Clearing and staining with China ink | USA | 100 | 78% | 6% |
| Pécora et al. 1993 [ | Clearing and staining with China ink | Brazil | 830 | 92.2% | 2.9% |
| Matzer 1993 [ | Clearing and staining with China ink | Guatemala | 50 | 96% | 4% |
| Calişkan et al. 1995 [ | Clearing and staining with China ink | Turkey | 100 | 80.3% | 1.9% |
| Sikri and Kumar 2003 [ | Periapical radiographs and clearing | India | 100 | 70% | 12% |
| Sert and Bayirli 2004 [ | Clearing and staining with China ink | Turkey | 200 | 76% | 1.5% |
| Oliveira and Lorio 2007 [ | Periapical radiographs and clearing and staining with China ink | Brazil | 1040 | 91.9% | 1.1% |
| Rahimi et al. 2013 [ | Clearing and staining with China ink | Iran | 149 | 80.5% | 12% |
| Amardeep et al. 2014 [ | CBCT | India | 250 | 79.6% | 2% |
Vertucci's root canal configuration.
Case reports of mandibular canines with two roots and two root canals (n = 26 articles).
| Author/year | Country | Tooth | Age (y)/sex | Root canal configuration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vawter 1886 [ | USA | #43 | 45 (female) | Birooted |
| Koskins 1926 [ | USA | #33, #33, #33 | 35 (female), 35 (female), and 35 (female) | All type V (1-2) |
| Slowey 1974 [ | USA | #33 | Unspecified | Type IV (2) |
| Rahmatulla and Wyne 1993 [ | Yemen | #43 | 28 (female) | Type V (1-2) |
| D'Arcangelo et al. 2001 [ | Italy | #43, #43 | 48 (female) and 60 (female) | Both type IV (2) |
| Wang et al. 2009 [ | China | #43, #43 | 46 (female) and 40 (female) | Type II (2-1) and IV (2) |
| Victorino et al. 2009 [ | Brazil | Bilateral | 40 (female) | Both type V (1-2) |
| Oporto et al. 2010 [ | Chile | #33 | 37 (female) | Type V (1-2) |
| Maden et al. 2010 [ | Turkey | #43 | 17 (female) | Type IV (2) |
| Andrei et al. 2010 [ | Romania | #43 | 54 (female) | Type IV (2) |
| Gaikwad 2011 [ | India | #33 | 20 (female) | Type V (1-2) |
| Fonseca et al. 2011 [ | Brazil | #33 | 39 (male) | Type V (1-2) |
| A. Bhardwaj and A. Bhardwaj 2011 [ | India | #43 | 18 (female) | Type V (1-2) |
| Andrei et al. 2011 [ | Romania | #43 | 59 (female) | Type IV (2) |
| Saberi 2011 [ | United Kingdom | #43 | 30 (male) | Type V (1-2) |
| Moogi et al. 2012 [ | India | #43 | 32 (female) | Type V (1-2) |
| Batra et al. 2012 [ | India | #33 | 35 (female) | Type V (1-2) |
| Ramírez-Sotelo et al. 2013 [ | Brazil | #33 | 21 (female) | Finding of birooted mandibular canine in CBCT and panoramic radiograph |
| Mithunjith and Borthakur 2013 [ | India | #43 | 42 (female) | Type IV (2) |
| Fuentes and Borie 2013 [ | Chile | Bilateral | 44 (female) | Finding of birooted mandibular canines in panoramic radiograph |
| Stojanac et al. 2014 [ | Serbia | #33, #33, #33, #43 | 42 (male), 38 (female), 44 (female), and 46 (female) | Types V (1-2), IV (2), V (1-2), and IV (2) |
| Mukhaimer and Arandi 2014 [ | Palestine | #43 | 23 (female) | Type V (1-2) |
| Ganesh et al. 2014 [ | India | #33 | 46 (female) | Type IV (2) |
| Gandhi and Bhat 2014 [ | India | #43 | 39 (male) | Type IV (2) |
| Fumei et al. 2014 [ | Italy | #43 | 30 (female) | Type V (1-2) |
| Kulkarni et al. 2016 [ | India | #43 | 54 (female) | Type IV (2) |
Vertucci's root canal configuration.