Literature DB >> 29057018

Influence of Electromechanical Activity on Cardiac Differentiation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells.

Worawan Limpitikul1, Nicolas Christoforou2, Susan A Thompson1, John D Gearhart3, Leslie Tung1, Elizabeth A Lipke4.   

Abstract

During differentiation, mouse embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (mESC-CMs) receive electromechanical cues from spontaneous beating. Therefore, promoting electromechanical activity via electrical pacing or suppressing it by drug treatment might affect the cellular functional development. Electrical pacing was applied to confluent monolayers of mESC-CMs during late-stage differentiation (days 16-18). Alternatively, spontaneous contraction was suppressed by (a) blocking ion currents with CsCl (HCN channel), trazodone (T-type Ca2+ channel), or both CsCl and trazodone on days 11-18; or (b) applying blebbistatin (excitation-contraction uncoupler) on days 11-14. Electrophysiological properties and gene expression were examined on day 19 and 18, respectively. Optical mapping revealed no significant difference in conduction velocity (CV)in paced vs. non-pacedmonolayers, nor were there significant changes in gene expression of connexin-43, Na-Ca exchanger (NCX), or myosin heavy chain (MHC). However, CV variability among differentiation batches and CV heterogeneity within individual monolayers were significantly lower in paced mESC-CMs. Alternatively, while the four drug treatments suppressed contraction with varying degrees (up to complete inhibition), there was no significant difference in CV for any of the treatments compared with controls. Trazodone treatment significantly reduced CV variability as compared to controls, whereas CsCl treatment significantly reduced CV heterogeneity. Distinct changes in gene expression of connexin-43, MHC, HCNl, Cav3.1/3.2 were not observed. Electrical pacing, but not suppression of spontaneous contraction, during late-stage differentiation reduces the intrinsic variability of CV among differentiation batches and across individual monolayers, which can be beneficial in the application of ESCs for myocardial tissue repair.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac regeneration; Cell culture; Electrical stimulation; Electrophysiology; Optical mapping

Year:  2010        PMID: 29057018      PMCID: PMC5647137          DOI: 10.1007/s13239-010-0020-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol        ISSN: 1869-408X            Impact factor:   2.495


  34 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation of neonatal cardiac myocytes activates the NFAT3 and GATA4 pathways and up-regulates the adenylosuccinate synthetase 1 gene.

Authors:  Y Xia; J B McMillin; A Lewis; M Moore; W G Zhu; R S Williams; R E Kellems
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-01-21       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Identification and characterization of embryonic stem cell-derived pacemaker and atrial cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  E Kolossov; Z Lu; I Drobinskaya; N Gassanov; Y Duan; H Sauer; O Manzke; W Bloch; H Bohlen; J Hescheler; B K Fleischmann
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  PKC-independent signal transduction pathways increase SERCA2 expression in adult rat cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Attia Anwar; Gerhild Taimor; Hüdayi Korkusuz; Hüdayi Korkususz; Rolf Schreckenberg; Tobias Berndt; Yaser Abdallah; Hans Michael Piper; Klaus-Dieter Schlüter
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 5.000

4.  Tissue engineering of vascularized cardiac muscle from human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Oren Caspi; Ayelet Lesman; Yaara Basevitch; Amira Gepstein; Gil Arbel; Irit Huber Manhal Habib; Lior Gepstein; Shulamit Levenberg
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Interactive effects of surface topography and pulsatile electrical field stimulation on orientation and elongation of fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Hoi Ting H Au; Irene Cheng; Mohammad F Chowdhury; Milica Radisic
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Tissue engineering: polymers flex their muscles.

Authors:  Wolfram-Hubertus Zimmermann
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 43.841

7.  Electrostimulation induces cardiomyocyte predifferentiation of fibroblasts.

Authors:  Jorge A Genovese; Cristiano Spadaccio; Jason Langer; Jaclyn Habe; Johnna Jackson; Amit N Patel
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Effects of electrical fields on cardiomyocyte differentiation of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  H Sauer; G Rahimi; J Hescheler; M Wartenberg
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 4.429

9.  Continual electric field stimulation preserves contractile function of adult ventricular myocytes in primary culture.

Authors:  H J Berger; S K Prasad; A J Davidoff; D Pimental; O Ellingsen; J D Marsh; T W Smith; R A Kelly
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-01

10.  Ca2+ removal mechanisms in mouse embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Ang Guo; Huang-Tian Yang
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.249

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Functional and Biomimetic Materials for Engineering of the Three-Dimensional Cell Microenvironment.

Authors:  Guoyou Huang; Fei Li; Xin Zhao; Yufei Ma; Yuhui Li; Min Lin; Guorui Jin; Tian Jian Lu; Guy M Genin; Feng Xu
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Functional cardiac tissue engineering.

Authors:  Brian Liau; Donghui Zhang; Nenad Bursac
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.806

3.  Optical mapping of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte graft electrical activity in injured hearts.

Authors:  Dominic Filice; Wahiba Dhahri; Joell L Solan; Paul D Lampe; Erin Steele; Nikita Milani; Benjamin Van Biber; Wei-Zhong Zhu; Tamilla Sadikov Valdman; Rocco Romagnuolo; José David Otero-Cruz; Kip D Hauch; Matthew W Kay; Narine Sarvazyan; Michael A Laflamme
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 6.832

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.