Kirstine Skov Benthien1, Mie Nordly2, Annika von Heymann-Horan3, Kristina Rosengaard Holmenlund4, Helle Timm5, Geana Paula Kurita6, Christoffer Johansen7, Jakob Kjellberg8, Hans von der Maase2, Per Sjøgren2. 1. Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: kirstine@skov-benthien.dk. 2. Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark; The Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. The Danish Knowledge Center for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Copenhagen, Denmark. 6. Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 7. Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; The Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark. 8. The Danish Institute for Local and Regional Government Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Avoidable hospital admissions are important negative indicators of quality of end-of-life care. Specialized palliative care (SPC) may support patients remaining at home. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate if SPC at home could prevent hospital admissions in patients with incurable cancer. METHODS: These are secondary results of Domus: a randomized controlled trial of accelerated transition to SPC with psychological intervention at home (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01885637). Participants were patients with incurable cancer and limited antineoplastic treatment options and their caregivers. They were included from the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, between 2013 and 2016. The control group received usual care. Outcomes were hospital admissions, causes thereof, and patient and caregiver perceptions of place of care (home, hospital, etc.) at baseline, four weeks, eight weeks, and six months. RESULTS: During the study, 340 patients were randomized and 322 were included in modified intention-to-treat analyses. Overall, there were no significant differences in hospital admissions between the groups. The intervention group had more admissions triggered by worsened general health (22% vs. 16%, P = 0.0436) or unmanageable home situation (8% vs. 4%, P = 0.0119). After diagnostics, admissions were more often caused by clinical symptoms of cancer without progression in the intervention group (11% vs. 7%, P = 0.0493). The two groups did not differ significantly in overall potentially avoidable admissions. Both groups felt mostly safe about their place of care. CONCLUSION: The intervention did not prevent hospital admissions. Likely, any intervention effects were outweighed by increased identification of problems in the intervention group leading to hospital admissions. Overall, patients and caregivers felt safe in their current place of care.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Avoidable hospital admissions are important negative indicators of quality of end-of-life care. Specialized palliative care (SPC) may support patients remaining at home. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate if SPC at home could prevent hospital admissions in patients with incurable cancer. METHODS: These are secondary results of Domus: a randomized controlled trial of accelerated transition to SPC with psychological intervention at home (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01885637). Participants were patients with incurable cancer and limited antineoplastic treatment options and their caregivers. They were included from the Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, between 2013 and 2016. The control group received usual care. Outcomes were hospital admissions, causes thereof, and patient and caregiver perceptions of place of care (home, hospital, etc.) at baseline, four weeks, eight weeks, and six months. RESULTS: During the study, 340 patients were randomized and 322 were included in modified intention-to-treat analyses. Overall, there were no significant differences in hospital admissions between the groups. The intervention group had more admissions triggered by worsened general health (22% vs. 16%, P = 0.0436) or unmanageable home situation (8% vs. 4%, P = 0.0119). After diagnostics, admissions were more often caused by clinical symptoms of cancer without progression in the intervention group (11% vs. 7%, P = 0.0493). The two groups did not differ significantly in overall potentially avoidable admissions. Both groups felt mostly safe about their place of care. CONCLUSION: The intervention did not prevent hospital admissions. Likely, any intervention effects were outweighed by increased identification of problems in the intervention group leading to hospital admissions. Overall, patients and caregivers felt safe in their current place of care.
Authors: Christine Marie Bækø Halling; Rasmus Trap Wolf; Per Sjøgren; Hans Von Der Maase; Helle Timm; Christoffer Johansen; Jakob Kjellberg Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 3.234