Literature DB >> 29056069

Quantifying the Relationship between Capability and Health in Older People: Can't Map, Won't Map.

Matthew Franklin1,2,3, Katherine Payne4, Rachel A Elliott4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intuitively, health and capability are distinct but linked concepts. This study aimed to quantify the link between a measure of health status (EQ-5D-3L) and capability (ICECAP-O) using regression-based methods.
METHODS: EQ-5D-3L and ICECAP-O data were collected from a sample of older people ( n = 584), aged over 65 years, requiring a hospital visit and/or care home resident, and recruited to one of 3 studies forming the Medical Crisis in Older People (MCOP) program in England. The link of EQ-5D-3L with 1) ICECAP-O tariff scores were estimated using ordinary least squares (OLS) or censored least absolute deviation (CLAD) regression models; and 2) ICECAP-O domain scores was estimated using multinomial logistic (MNL) regression. Mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), absolute difference (AD) between mean observed and estimated values, and the R2 statistic were used to judge model performance.
RESULTS: In this sample of older people ( n = 584), higher scores on the EQ-5D-3L were shown to be linked with higher ICECAP-O scores when using linear regression. An OLS-regression model was identified to be the best performing model with the lowest error statistics (AD = 0.0000; MAE = 0.1208; MSE = 0.1626) and highest goodness of fit ( R2 = 0.3532); model performance was poor when predicting the lower ICECAP-O tariff scores. The three domains of the EQ-5D-3L showing a statistically significant quantifiable link with the ICECAP-O tariff score were self-care, usual activities, and anxiety/depression.
CONCLUSION: A quantifiable, but weak, link between health (EQ-5D-3L) and capability (ICECAP-O) was identified. The findings from this study add further support that the ICECAP-O is providing complimentary information to the EQ-5D-3L. Mapping between the 2 measures is not advisable and the measures should not be used as direct substitutes to capture the impact of interventions in economic evaluations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EQ-5D-3L; ICECAP-O; capability; health status; quality of life; regression analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29056069     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17732975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  3 in total

Review 1.  Capability instruments in economic evaluations of health-related interventions: a comparative review of the literature.

Authors:  Timea Mariann Helter; Joanna Coast; Agata Łaszewska; Tanja Stamm; Judit Simon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Measuring capabilities in health and physical activity promotion: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Till; K Abu-Omar; S Ferschl; A K Reimers; P Gelius
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Predicting presenteeism using measures of health status.

Authors:  Cheryl Jones; Katherine Payne; Alexander Thompson; Suzanne M M Verstappen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.