Literature DB >> 29055892

Perceived support at work after critical incidents and its relation to psychological distress: a survey among prehospital providers.

Juul Gouweloos-Trines1,2, Mark P Tyler3,4, Melita J Giummarra5,6, Nancy Kassam-Adams7,8, Markus A Landolt9,10, Rolf J Kleber2,11, Eva Alisic9,12.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prehospital providers are at increased risk for psychological distress. Support at work after critical incidents is believed to be important for providers, but current guidelines are in need of more scientific evidence. This study aimed to investigate: (1) to what extent prehospital providers experience support at work; (2) whether support at work is directly associated with lower distress and (3) whether availability of a formal peer support system is related to lower distress via perceived colleague support.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study surveyed prehospital providers from eight western industrialised countries between June and November 2014. A supportive work environment was operationalised as perceived management and colleague support (Job Content Questionnaire), availability of a formal peer support system and having enough time to recover after critical incidents. The outcome variable was psychological distress (Kessler 10). We conducted multiple linear regression analyses and mediation analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 813 respondents, more than half (56.2%) were at moderate to high risk of psychological distress. Participants did not consistently report support at work (eg, 39.4% were not aware of formal peer support). Perceived management support (b (unstandardised regression coefficient)=-0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.00), having enough time to recover after critical incidents (b=-0.07, 95% CI -0.09 to -0.04) and perceived colleague support (b=-0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.00) were related to lower distress. Availability of formal peer support was indirectly related to lower distress via increased perceived colleague support (β=-0.04, 95% CI -0.02 to -0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital providers at risk of psychological distress may benefit from support from colleagues and management and from having time to recover after critical incidents. Formal peer support may assist providers by increasing their sense of support from colleagues. These findings need to be verified in a longitudinal design. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  paramedics; prehospital care, basic ambulance care; psychological conditions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29055892     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

1.  Factors influencing career success of clinical nurses in northwestern China based on Kaleidoscope Career Model: Structural equation model.

Authors:  Chao Wu; Lin-Yuan Zhang; Xin-Yan Zhang; Yan-Ling Du; Shi-Zhe He; Li-Rong Yu; Hong-Fang Chen; Lei Shang; Hong-Juan Lang
Journal:  J Nurs Manag       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.680

2.  Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident.

Authors:  Elena A Skryabina; Naomi Betts; Richard Amlôt; Gabriel Reedy
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2021-11-24

3.  Why do ambulance employees (not) seek organisational help for mental health support? A mixed-methods systematic review protocol of organisational support available and barriers/facilitators to uptake.

Authors:  Sasha Johnston; Kristy Sanderson; Lucy Bowes; Jennifer Wild
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Stress at work: Self-monitoring of stressors and resources to support employees.

Authors:  Merel Marjolein van Herpen; Hans Te Brake; Miranda Olff
Journal:  Stress Health       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 5.  Mental health and help seeking among trauma-exposed emergency service staff: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Niklas Maximilian Auth; Matthew James Booker; Jennifer Wild; Ruth Riley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A model to explain the challenges of emergency medical technicians' decision making process in emergency situations: a grounded theory.

Authors:  Meysam Safi-Keykaleh; Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh; Zohreh Ghomian; Katarina Bohm
Journal:  J Inj Violence Res       Date:  2022-01-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.