Literature DB >> 29055671

The Interplay between Feedback and Buffering in Cellular Homeostasis.

Edward J Hancock1, Jordan Ang2, Antonis Papachristodoulou3, Guy-Bart Stan4.   

Abstract

Buffering, the use of reservoirs of molecules to maintain concentrations of key molecular species, and negative feedback are the primary known mechanisms for robust homeostatic regulation. To our knowledge, however, the fundamental principles behind their combined effect have not been elucidated. Here, we study the interplay between buffering and negative feedback in the context of cellular homeostasis. We show that negative feedback counteracts slow-changing disturbances, whereas buffering counteracts fast-changing disturbances. Furthermore, feedback and buffering have limitations that create trade-offs for regulation: instability in the case of feedback and molecular noise in the case of buffering. However, because buffering stabilizes feedback and feedback attenuates noise from slower-acting buffering, their combined effect on homeostasis can be synergistic. These effects can be explained within a traditional control theory framework and are consistent with experimental observations of both ATP homeostasis and pH regulation in vivo. These principles are critical for studying robustness and homeostasis in biology and biotechnology.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATP; Le Chatelier's principle; buffering; control theory; derivative control; feedback; glycolysis; homeostasis; phosphocreatine; systems biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29055671     DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Syst        ISSN: 2405-4712            Impact factor:   10.304


  7 in total

1.  Stabilization of antithetic control via molecular buffering.

Authors:  Edward J Hancock; Diego A Oyarzún
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Metabolic buffer analysis reveals the simultaneous, independent control of ATP and adenylate energy ratios.

Authors:  Edward J Hancock; James R Krycer; Jordan Ang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Selenoprotein W ensures physiological bone remodeling by preventing hyperactivity of osteoclasts.

Authors:  Hyunsoo Kim; Kyunghee Lee; Jin Man Kim; Mi Yeong Kim; Jae-Ryong Kim; Han-Woong Lee; Youn Wook Chung; Hong-In Shin; Taesoo Kim; Eui-Soon Park; Jaerang Rho; Seoung Hoon Lee; Nacksung Kim; Soo Young Lee; Yongwon Choi; Daewon Jeong
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Biomolecular mechanisms for signal differentiation.

Authors:  Emmanouil Alexis; Carolin C M Schulte; Luca Cardelli; Antonis Papachristodoulou
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-11-17

5.  CoRa-A general approach for quantifying biological feedback control.

Authors:  Mariana Gómez-Schiavon; Hana El-Samad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Autoregulation of H+/lactate efflux prevents monocarboxylate transport (MCT) inhibitors from reducing glycolytic lactic acid production.

Authors:  Wiktoria Blaszczak; Hannah Williams; Pawel Swietach
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 9.075

7.  Glucocorticoid Receptor Alpha Targets SLC2A4 to Regulate Protein Synthesis and Breakdown in Porcine Skeletal Muscle Cells.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Du; Wei-Jing Xu; Jia-Li Shi; Kai Guo; Chang-Tong Guo; Rong Zheng; Si-Wen Jiang; Jin Chai
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-05-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.