Kaivan Vaidya1, Clare Arnott2, Gonzalo J Martínez3, Bernard Ng4, Samuel McCormack4, David R Sullivan5, David S Celermajer6, Sanjay Patel7. 1. Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 3. The Heart Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Pontificia Universidad Católica Hospital, Santiago, Chile. 4. Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 5. Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Biochemistry, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 6. Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The Heart Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 7. Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The Heart Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: sanjay.patel@sydney.edu.au.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate the plaque-modifying effects of low-dose colchicine therapy plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS), as assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA). BACKGROUND: Colchicine therapy has been postulated to have beneficial anti-inflammatory effects in patients with ACS, translating into reduction in future adverse cardiovascular events. However, whether favorable plaque modification underpins this is yet unproven. METHODS: In this prospective nonrandomized observational study of 80 patients with recent ACS (<1 month), patients received either 0.5 mg/day colchicine plus OMT or OMT alone and were followed for 1 year. Our primary outcome was change in low attenuation plaque volume (LAPV), a marker of plaque instability on coronary CTA and robust predictor of adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were changes in other coronary CTA measures and in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). RESULTS: Mean duration of follow-up was 12.6 months; mean age was 57.4 years. Colchicine therapy significantly reduced LAPV (mean 15.9 mm3 [-40.9%] vs. 6.6 mm3 [-17.0%]; p = 0.008) and hsCRP (mean 1.10 mg/l [-37.3%] vs. 0.38 mg/l [-14.6%]; p < 0.001) versus controls. Reductions in total atheroma volume (mean 42.3 mm3 vs. 26.4 mm3; p = 0.28) and low-density lipoprotein levels (mean 0.44 mmol/l vs. 0.49 mmol/l; p = 0.21) were comparable in both groups. With multivariate linear regression, colchicine therapy remained significantly associated with greater reduction in LAPV (p = 0.039) and hsCRP (p = 0.004). There was also a significant linear association (p < 0.001) and strong positive correlation (r = 0.578) between change in LAPV and hsCRP. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest, for the first time, that low-dose colchicine therapy favorably modifies coronary plaque, independent of high-dose statin intensification therapy and substantial low-density lipoprotein reduction. The improvements in plaque morphology are likely driven by the anti-inflammatory properties of colchicine, as demonstrated by reductions in hsCRP, rather than changes in lipoproteins. Colchicine may be beneficial as an additional secondary prevention agent in patients post-ACS if validated in future studies. Crown
OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate the plaque-modifying effects of low-dose colchicine therapy plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS), as assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA). BACKGROUND:Colchicine therapy has been postulated to have beneficial anti-inflammatory effects in patients with ACS, translating into reduction in future adverse cardiovascular events. However, whether favorable plaque modification underpins this is yet unproven. METHODS: In this prospective nonrandomized observational study of 80 patients with recent ACS (<1 month), patients received either 0.5 mg/day colchicine plus OMT or OMT alone and were followed for 1 year. Our primary outcome was change in low attenuation plaque volume (LAPV), a marker of plaque instability on coronary CTA and robust predictor of adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were changes in other coronary CTA measures and in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). RESULTS: Mean duration of follow-up was 12.6 months; mean age was 57.4 years. Colchicine therapy significantly reduced LAPV (mean 15.9 mm3 [-40.9%] vs. 6.6 mm3 [-17.0%]; p = 0.008) and hsCRP (mean 1.10 mg/l [-37.3%] vs. 0.38 mg/l [-14.6%]; p < 0.001) versus controls. Reductions in total atheroma volume (mean 42.3 mm3 vs. 26.4 mm3; p = 0.28) and low-density lipoprotein levels (mean 0.44 mmol/l vs. 0.49 mmol/l; p = 0.21) were comparable in both groups. With multivariate linear regression, colchicine therapy remained significantly associated with greater reduction in LAPV (p = 0.039) and hsCRP (p = 0.004). There was also a significant linear association (p < 0.001) and strong positive correlation (r = 0.578) between change in LAPV and hsCRP. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest, for the first time, that low-dose colchicine therapy favorably modifies coronary plaque, independent of high-dose statin intensification therapy and substantial low-density lipoprotein reduction. The improvements in plaque morphology are likely driven by the anti-inflammatory properties of colchicine, as demonstrated by reductions in hsCRP, rather than changes in lipoproteins. Colchicine may be beneficial as an additional secondary prevention agent in patients post-ACS if validated in future studies. Crown
Authors: Andrew P Demidowich; Anna Wolska; Sierra R Wilson; Jordan A Levine; Alexander V Sorokin; Sheila M Brady; Alan T Remaley; Jack A Yanovski Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 4.766
Authors: Alberto Cecconi; Jean Paul Vilchez-Tschischke; Jesus Mateo; Javier Sanchez-Gonzalez; Samuel España; Rodrigo Fernandez-Jimenez; Beatriz Lopez-Melgar; Leticia Fernández Friera; Gonzalo J López-Martín; Valentin Fuster; Jesus Ruiz-Cabello; Borja Ibañez Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Jacob W Groenendyk; Parag Shukla; Amit K Dey; Youssef A Elnabawi; Milena Aksentijevich; Harry Choi; Leonard D Genovese; Charlotte L Harrington; Balaji Natarajan; Aditya Goyal; Aarthi S Reddy; Justin Rodante; Mohammad Tarek Kabbany; Ahmed Sadek; Mina Al Najafi; Martin P Playford; Aditya A Joshi; Mark A Ahlman; Joel M Gelfand; David A Bluemke; Nehal N Mehta Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-08-05 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Khaled M Abdelrahman; Marcus Y Chen; Amit K Dey; Renu Virmani; Aloke V Finn; Ramzi Y Khamis; Andrew D Choi; James K Min; Michelle C Williams; Andrew J Buckler; Charles A Taylor; Campbell Rogers; Habib Samady; Charalambos Antoniades; Leslee J Shaw; Matthew J Budoff; Udo Hoffmann; Ron Blankstein; Jagat Narula; Nehal N Mehta Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Nicholas J Montarello; Mau T Nguyen; Dennis T L Wong; Stephen J Nicholls; Peter J Psaltis Journal: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 3.727