Literature DB >> 2905490

The rare-male effect: what is its evolutionary significance?

L Partridge1.   

Abstract

Negatively frequency-dependent male mating success, the rare-male effect (RME), has been reported from many laboratory experiments, particularly with Drosophila spp. Problems with observer bias, lack of repeatability, with experimental design and with the analysis of data may indicate that the RME is considerably less well documented than has been supposed, even in the laboratory. Male competition is unlikely to be a common cause of the RME, except where there are behavioural differences between competing strains that result in lower competition between them than within them. A mixture of fixed female preferences seems the most likely cause, and further behavioural studies are required to investigate this mechanism. There is no convincing evidence that the RME is a consequence of frequency-dependent female preferences. An RME in the absence of negative assortment is not in general expected to lead to the avoidance of inbreeding because matings between relatives will not be reduced. Nor is it likely to contribute to the high levels of genetic polymorphism found in nature, because females would be required to base their mating preferences on genotypes at all or most loci, to show individual variation in respect of their preferences and to sum the information into an index of genomic rarity. Given the levels of polymorphism involved, all males are likely to be rare by some criterion. A varying direction of female preference, required for a two-sided RME and for the maintenance of genetic polymorphism, has yet to be reported from wild populations. The RME is therefore probably of limited evolutionary significance. Disassortative mating with respect to self-incompatibility alleles in plants, and possibly major histocompatibility complex (MHC) alleles in vertebrates, results in an RME, inbreeding avoidance and high levels of genetic polymorphism at these loci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2905490     DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1988.0063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  12 in total

1.  Direct observation of sexual competition in Drosophila melanogaster: the mutant white in competition with other genotypes.

Authors:  E Depiereux; C Dernoncourt-Sterpin; J Lechien; E Feytmans; A Elens
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Drosophila melanogaster virgins are more likely to mate with strangers than familiar flies.

Authors:  Anders Odeen; Clea M Moray
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-09-26

3.  Evolutionary ecology: Novelty makes the heart grow fonder.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McKinnon; Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Genetic versus phenotypic models of selection: can genetics be neglected in a long-term perspective?

Authors:  F J Weissing
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Reversible frequency-dependent switches in male mate choice.

Authors:  H van Gossum; R Stoks; L De Bruyn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Genetic variation in threshold reaction norms for alternative reproductive tactics in male Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar.

Authors:  Jacinthe Piché; Jeffrey A Hutchings; Wade Blanchard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  A Drosophila male pheromone affects female sexual receptivity.

Authors:  Micheline Grillet; Laurence Dartevelle; Jean-François Ferveur
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Beyond sex allocation: the role of mating systems in sexual selection in parasitoid wasps.

Authors:  Rebecca A Boulton; Laura A Collins; David M Shuker
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-07-01

9.  Sexual responsiveness is condition-dependent in female guppies, but preference functions are not.

Authors:  Alexandra Syriatowicz; Robert Brooks
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 2.964

10.  Related male Drosophila melanogaster reared together as larvae fight less and sire longer lived daughters.

Authors:  Pau Carazo; Jennifer C Perry; Fern Johnson; Tommaso Pizzari; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.