Literature DB >> 29054884

Assessing the extent of non-aggressive cancer in clinically detected stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Minal S Kale1, Keith Sigel1, Grace Mhango1, Juan P Wisnivesky1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overdiagnosis among clinically detected lung cancers likely consists of cases that are non-aggressive and slowly progressive and will never disseminate, cause symptoms or be a threat to a subject's survival, even if untreated. In this study, we estimate the prevalence of non-aggressive lung cancers from a large, population-based cancer registry.
METHODS: We identified individuals ≥65 years with histologically confirmed, untreated stage I non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare registry. We estimated the rate of non-aggressive lung cancers by determining the point at which the cumulative lung cancer-specific survival curve no longer changed (ie, the slope approaches zero). At this point, there are no additional deaths due to progressive lung cancer observed among untreated patients after adjusting for deaths from competing risks (these long-term survivors can be considered 'non-aggressive cases).
RESULTS: The overall rate of non-aggressive cancers among 2197 clinically detected cases of untreated stage I NSCLC was 2.4%, 95% CI: 1.0% to 3.8%. The rate of non-aggressive cancer was 1.9% (95% CI: 0.0% to 4.9%) for women and 2.4% (95% CI: 0.7% to 4.1%) for men (p=0.84). When stratifying by tumour size, non-aggressive cancer rates were 10.2% (95% CI: 0.0% to 29.3%), 2.1% (95% CI: 0.0% to 9.2%), 4.9% (95% CI: 0.0% to 10.3%), 1.8% (95% CI: 0.0% to 5.2%) and 0.0% (95% CI: 0.0% to 1.0%) for tumour sizes <15 mm, 15-24 mm, 25-34 mm, 35-44 mm and ≥45 mm, respectively. In comparison with the smallest tumour sizes (<15 mm), the rates of non-aggressive cancers were not statistically significantly different for tumour sizes 15-24 mm (p=0.36), 25-34 mm (p=0.57), 35-44 mm (p=0.38) and tumour sizes >45 mm (p=0.30). DISCUSSION: We found relatively low rates of non-aggressive cancers among clinically detected, stage I NSCLC regardless of sex or size. Our findings suggest that most clinically diagnosed early stage cancers should be treated with curative intent. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  non-small cell lung cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29054884      PMCID: PMC5903994          DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  21 in total

1.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Overdiagnosis in cancer.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; William C Black
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Lung cancer screening, overdiagnosis bias, and reevaluation of the Mayo Lung Project.

Authors:  Edward F Patz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  A critical appraisal of overdiagnosis: estimates of its magnitude and implications for lung cancer screening.

Authors:  J M Reich
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  The importance of tumor size in prognosis for resected bronchogenic carcinoma.

Authors:  P E Buell
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 6.  Screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Death certificates provide an adequate source of cause of death information when evaluating lung cancer mortality: an example from the Mayo Lung Project.

Authors:  V Paul Doria-Rose; Pamela M Marcus
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 5.705

8.  Survival for clinical stage I lung cancer not surgically treated. Comparison between screen-detected and symptom-detected cases. The Japanese Lung Cancer Screening Research Group.

Authors:  T Sobue; T Suzuki; M Matsuda; T Kuroishi; S Ikeda; T Naruke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Julie M Legler; Joan L Warren; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  2 in total

1.  Inequivalence of non-aggressiveness in clinically diagnosed lung cancers and overdiagnosis in lung cancer screening trials.

Authors:  Jerome M Reich; Jong S Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  The narrow path to organized LDCT lung cancer screening programs in Europe.

Authors:  Eugenio Paci
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.