Literature DB >> 29054851

Changes in the venous pulse waveform in pericardial effusion revealed by Doppler echocardiography of the superior vena cava.

Benoy N Shah1, Dhrubo J Rakhit2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29054851      PMCID: PMC5660288          DOI: 10.1530/ERP-17-0025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echo Res Pract        ISSN: 2055-0464


× No keyword cloud information.

Summary

Echocardiography is valuable for urgent assessment of the haemodynamic significance of pericardial effusions and thus assisting in the clinical diagnosis of cardiac tamponade. Classical echocardiographic findings (e.g. respiratory variation in trans-valvular velocities) are not always present and, when seen, may be attributable to other conditions (e.g. obesity or obstructive airways disease) (1). Therefore, it is important to be familiar with other abnormalities that may be observed, such as that in the superior vena cava (SVC). SVC imaging is best performed from the right supraclavicular window, with the transducer placed vertically in the fossa between the sternal and clavicular heads of the sternomastoid muscle and with the patient lying supine and the transducer marker pointing superiorly (2). Figure 1 (and Videos 1 and 2), taken in a 46-year-old male who presented with dizziness and had a large global pericardial effusion on 2D echocardiography, illustrate the changes seen in the SVC flow profile (which reflect the changes seen in the jugular venous pulse (JVP) waveform upon physical examination) before and after pericardiocentesis. SVC Doppler interrogation may be particularly valuable for determining the dominant haemodynamic condition in patients with both pericardial effusion and suspected pericardial constriction. In cardiac tamponade, compression occurs throughout the cardiac cycle and thus ventricular filling is impaired throughout diastole, resulting in minimal or no flow into the right atrium from the SVC during diastole (i.e. absence of the diastolic wave (absent Y descent in the JVP)) (3). However, in pericardial constriction, early ventricular filling is preserved and is rapid but ends abruptly as soon as maximum intrapericardial pressure is reached, resulting in both systolic and diastolic (D) waves though the D wave has a steep deceleration slope (Fig. 2), mirroring the rapid Y descent observed in the JVP (4).
Figure 1

Pulsed Doppler echocardiography of the superior vena cava in our patient admitted with dizziness and with a large global effusion on echocardiography. Initially, flow was noted in systole but not in diastole (panel A). Following successful drainage of over 600 mL of fluid, with swift haemodynamic and clinical improvement, there was restoration of flow in both systole and diastole in the SVC (panel B).

Figure 2

SVC Doppler tracing from a patient with pericardial constriction. Note the initial steep deceleration slope (arrows) of the diastolic (D) waves, which reflect the rapid Y descent seen in the jugular venous pulse on physical examination.

Pulsed Doppler echocardiography of the superior vena cava in our patient admitted with dizziness and with a large global effusion on echocardiography. Initially, flow was noted in systole but not in diastole (panel A). Following successful drainage of over 600 mL of fluid, with swift haemodynamic and clinical improvement, there was restoration of flow in both systole and diastole in the SVC (panel B). SVC Doppler tracing from a patient with pericardial constriction. Note the initial steep deceleration slope (arrows) of the diastolic (D) waves, which reflect the rapid Y descent seen in the jugular venous pulse on physical examination. Color Doppler imaging of the superior vena cava before pericardiocentesis, revealing monophasic flow during systole only. View Video 1 at http://movie-usa.glencoesoftware.com/video/10.1530/ERP-17-0025/video-1. Download Video 1 Color Doppler imaging of the SVC after pericardiocentesis, revealing restoration of normal flow -in systole and diastole – within the SVC. View Video 2 at http://movie-usa.glencoesoftware.com/video/10.1530/ERP-17-0025/video-2. Download Video 2

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of this article.

Funding

This work did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.

Patient consent

Written permission has been obtained from the patient.

Author contribution statement

B N S conceived the idea for the article, wrote the first draft and created the figures. D J R provided critical feedback and edited the manuscript. B N S is the corresponding author and guarantor.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Echocardiography of the superior vena cava.

Authors:  Rami N Khouzam; Daniel Minderman; Ivan A D'Cruz
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  Doppler echocardiography in cardiac tamponade and constrictive pericarditis.

Authors:  S Zhang; D M Kerins; B F Byrd
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.724

3.  Diagnostic role of Doppler echocardiography in constrictive pericarditis.

Authors:  J K Oh; L K Hatle; J B Seward; G K Danielson; H V Schaff; G S Reeder; A J Tajik
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Comparison of mitral inflow and superior vena cava Doppler velocities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and constrictive pericarditis.

Authors:  S Boonyaratavej; J K Oh; A J Tajik; C P Appleton; J B Seward
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 24.094

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.