| Literature DB >> 29054839 |
Albree Tower-Rader1, Jorge Betancor1, Zoran B Popovic1, Kimi Sato1, Maran Thamilarasan1, Nicholas G Smedira1, Harry M Lever1, Milind Y Desai2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, we sought to determine whether LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) provided incremental prognostic utility. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; outcome; strain
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29054839 PMCID: PMC5721859 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Heart Assoc ISSN: 2047-9980 Impact factor: 5.501
Figure 1An example of left ventricular global longitudinal strain measurement from the current study.
Baseline Demographic and Clinical Data of the Study Population (n=1019)
| Variable | Total Sample (N=1019) |
|---|---|
| Age, y | 50±12 |
| Male sex | 640 (63%) |
| Hypertension | 454 (45%) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 120 (12%) |
| Family history of HCM | 172 (17%) |
| Family history of sudden cardiac death | 110 (11%) |
| History of sudden cardiac death | 6 (0.6%) |
| Unexplained syncope | 146 (14%) |
| History of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia | 112 (11%) |
| Beta‐blockers | 746 (73%) |
| Calcium‐channel blocker | 316 (31%) |
| Disopyramide | 42 (4%) |
| Angina | 143 (14%) |
| NYHA Class | |
| I | 296 (29%) |
| II | 526 (52%) |
| III/IV | 197 (19%) |
| Major HCM risk factors | |
| None | 766 (75%) |
| 1 | 225 (22%) |
| 2 or more | 28 (3%) |
| 5‐y ESC risk score (%) | 4.1±0.7 |
| ESC risk score categories | |
| Low (<4%) | 663 (65%) |
| Intermediate (4–6%) | 194 (19%) |
| High (>6%) | 162 (16%) |
ESC indicates European Society of Cardiology; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; NYHA, New York Heart Association.
Baseline Echocardiographic Variables for the Study Population (n=1019)
| Variable | Total (N=1019) |
|---|---|
| Left ventricular ejection fraction, % | 62±4 |
| Indexed left ventricular end‐diastolic dimension, cm/m2 | 2.02±0.3 |
| Indexed left ventricular end‐systolic dimension, cm/m2 | 1.2±0.3 |
| Maximal left ventricular thickness, cm | 2.0±0.2 |
| Indexed left atrial dimensions, cm/m2 | 2.2±0.4 |
| Diastolic dysfunction | |
| Abnormal relaxation | 937 (92%) |
| Pseudonormal | 71 (7%) |
| Restrictive physiology | 11 (1%) |
| Resting mitral regurgitation | |
| None | 43 (4%) |
| I to II+ | 881 (87%) |
| ≥III+ | 95 (9%) |
| Resting LVOT gradient, mm Hg | 52±42 |
| Resting LVOG gradient >30 mm Hg | 718 (70%) |
| Maximal LVOT gradient, mm Hg | 103±36 |
| LV‐GLS, % | −13.6±4 |
| LV‐GLS | |
| Better than median (≥ −13.7%) | 510 (50%) |
| Worse than median (<13.7%) | 509 (50%) |
| Metabolic exercise echocardiography | 627 (62%) |
| >85% Age‐sex predicted METs | 255 (41%) |
| Maximum METs achieved | 6.6±2 |
| Peak oxygen consumption, mL/kg/min | 21±6 |
| Abnormal BP response to exercise | 8 (1%) |
BP indicates blood pressure; LV‐GLS, left ventricular global longitudinal strain; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; METs, metabolic equivalents of task.
Data based upon the subgroup that underwent cardiopulmonary stress echocardiography.
Multivariable Competing Risk Regression Analysis in the Study Population (n=1019) Based on the Fine–Gray Proportional Subhazards Model (Primary Composite Events=69; Noncardiac Deaths=10)
| Subhazard Ratio |
| |
|---|---|---|
| (A) Model 1 (with standard major ACC/AHA SCD risk factors included in analysis) | ||
| Age, y | 1.04 [1.02–1.07] | <0.001 |
| Atrial fibrillation during follow‐up | 1.39 [1.11–1.69] | <0.001 |
| LV‐GLS (for every % worsening) | 1.11 [1.05–1.22] | <0.001 |
| Surgical myectomy | 0.44 [0.25–0.72] | <0.01 |
| Following potential additional predictors were considered for analysis, but were not significant: standard ACC/AHA major SCD risk factors (none, 1, ≥2), sex, maximal LVOT gradient, medical therapy | ||
| (B) Model 2 (with ESC risk score included in analysis) | ||
| Atrial fibrillation during follow‐up | 1.47 [1.17–2.21] | <0.001 |
| LV‐GLS (for every % worsening) | 1.13 [1.08–1.22] | <0.001 |
| Surgical myectomy | 0.42 [0.22–0.64] | <0.01 |
| Following potential additional predictors were considered for analysis, but were not significant: ESC risk score, sex, medical therapy | ||
ACC/AHA indicates American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; LV‐GLS, left ventricular global longitudinal strain; LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract; SCD, sudden cardiac death.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier curves for primary composite event, separated on the basis of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV‐GLS) better or worse than median.
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier curves for primary composite event, separated on the basis of myectomy vs not during follow‐up.
Figure 4Kaplan–Meier curves for primary composite event, separated into 4 subgroups on the basis of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV‐GLS) better or worse than median and myectomy vs not during follow‐up.
Figure 5Nomogram of estimated risk of primary composites at 5 years for resting left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV‐GLS) in (A) the overall cohort and (B) stratified based on myectomy vs not. Solid line represents the 5‐year parametric estimates of instantaneous risk of event. Solid lines are enclosed by a 68% confidence interval (dotted lines).