Literature DB >> 29053809

Comparative effects of two multi-enzyme combinations and a Bacillus probiotic on growth performance, digestibility of energy and nutrients, disappearance of non-starch polysaccharides, and gut microflora in broiler chickens.

A L Wealleans1, M C Walsh1, L F Romero1, V Ravindran2.   

Abstract

The efficacy of two exogenous enzyme combinations and a multi-strain Bacillus probiotic (DFM) on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, disappearance of non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) and gut microbial composition was investigated in broilers. One-day old Ross 308 chicks were assigned to 36 pens with 22 birds/pen and 6 pens/treatment (Experiment 1) or 36 cages with 8 birds/cage and 6 cages/treatment (Experiment 2). Treatment additives were added to nutritionally complete corn/soy based starter (d 1 to 21) and finisher (d 22 to 42) diets. Treatments included 1) a control diet containing 500 FTU/kg phytase (CTL), 2) CTL + xylanase (2,000 U/kg) and amylase (200 U/kg; XA), 3) CTL+XA + protease (4000 U/g; XAP), 4) CTL+DFM (150,000 cfu/g of 3 strains of Bacillus spp), 5) CTL+DFM+XA, and 6) CTL+DFM+XAP. Supplementation with DFM increased BW, BWG, and FI compared with the CTL (P < 0.05); XAP, but not XA, resulted in increased final BW, BWG and FI compared to the control (P < 0.05). XA and XAP improved apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of starch and fat on d 22 to 42 with XAP improving AMEn (by ∼82 kcal) compared with CTL birds (P < 0.01). DFM+XAP improved apparent ileal digestible energy (AIDE), AID of fat and starch on d 22 to 42, and additionally had a greater than additive effect on AIDE and AMEn. Supplementation with DFM+XAP reduced the ileal and total tract flow of insoluble arabinose and additionally total tract flow of soluble and insoluble xylose and total galactose (P < 0.05); similar effects of XA+DFM were not seen or were lower in magnitude, suggesting that the protease component plays an important role in increasing the availability of NSP for hydrolysis. Supplementation with DFM alone did not affect gut bacterial populations, but XA and XAP reduced numbers of Campylobacter species (by > 2.5 log cfu/g; P < 0.001) and Bacteroides (P < 0.02) in the cecum compared with CTL birds.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Poultry Science Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  broilers; carbohydrase; digestibility; performance; probiotics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29053809      PMCID: PMC5850647          DOI: 10.3382/ps/pex226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  27 in total

1.  The effect of dietary wheat middlings and enzyme supplementation II: apparent nutrient digestibility, digestive tract size, gut viscosity, and gut morphology in two strains of leghorn hens.

Authors:  D Jaroni; S E Scheideler; M M Beck; C Wyatt
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Sources of Campylobacter colonization in broiler chickens.

Authors:  D G Newell; C Fearnley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  The role of added feed enzymes in promoting gut health in swine and poultry.

Authors:  Elijah Kiarie; Luis F Romero; Charles M Nyachoti
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 7.800

4.  Comparison of chicken gut colonisation by the pathogens Campylobacter jejuni and Clostridium perfringens by real-time quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Beate Skånseng; Magne Kaldhusdal; Knut Rudi
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Alpha-amylase supplementation of broiler diets based on corn.

Authors:  M I Gracia; M J Araníbar; R Lázaro; P Medel; G G Mateos
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Effect of exogenous xylanase, amylase, and protease as single or combined activities on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of broilers fed corn/soy diets.

Authors:  A M Amerah; L F Romero; A Awati; V Ravindran
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Effect of oligosaccharide-free soybean meal on true metabolizable energy and fiber digestion in adult roosters.

Authors:  C N Coon; K L Leske; O Akavanichan; T K Cheng
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Amplification of an invA gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium by polymerase chain reaction as a specific method of detection of Salmonella.

Authors:  K Rahn; S A De Grandis; R C Clarke; S A McEwen; J E Galán; C Ginocchio; R Curtiss; C L Gyles
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Molecular ecological analysis of porcine ileal microbiota responses to antimicrobial growth promoters.

Authors:  C T Collier; M R Smiricky-Tjardes; D M Albin; J E Wubben; V M Gabert; B Deplancke; D Bane; D B Anderson; H R Gaskins
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Effects of exogenous proteases without or with carbohydrases on nutrient digestibility and disappearance of non-starch polysaccharides in broiler chickens.

Authors:  O A Olukosi; L A Beeson; K Englyst; L F Romero
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Potential Feed Additives as Antibiotic Alternatives in Broiler Production.

Authors:  Habtamu Ayalew; Haijun Zhang; Jing Wang; Shugeng Wu; Kai Qiu; Guanghai Qi; Ayalsew Tekeste; Teketay Wassie; Demissie Chanie
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-17

2.  Supplementation of Bacillus subtilis GM5 enhances broiler body weight gain and modulates cecal microbiota.

Authors:  Guzel Hadieva; Marat Lutfullin; Daria Pudova; Yaw Akosah; Elena Shagimardanova; Natalia Gogoleva; Margarita Sharipova; Ayslu Mardanova
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 3.  Utility of Feed Enzymes and Yeast Derivatives in Ameliorating Deleterious Effects of Coccidiosis on Intestinal Health and Function in Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  Elijah G Kiarie; Haley Leung; Reza Akbari Moghaddam Kakhki; Rob Patterson; John R Barta
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-12-20

4.  A novel consensus bacterial 6-phytase variant completely replaced inorganic phosphate in broiler diets, maintaining growth performance and bone quality: data from two independent trials.

Authors:  L Marchal; A Bello; E B Sobotik; G Archer; Y Dersjant-Li
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Influence of Heat Stress on Poultry Growth Performance, Intestinal Inflammation, and Immune Function and Potential Mitigation by Probiotics.

Authors:  Rafiq Ahmad; Yu-Hsiang Yu; Felix Shih-Hsiang Hsiao; Chin-Hui Su; Hsiu-Chou Liu; Isabel Tobin; Guolong Zhang; Yeong-Hsiang Cheng
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Exogenous emulsifiers and multi-enzyme combination improves growth performance of the young broiler chickens fed low energy diets containing vegetable oil.

Authors:  Samiru Sudharaka Wickramasuriya; Shemil Priyan Macelline; Eunjoo Kim; Taeg Kyun Shin; Hyun Min Cho; Dinesh D Jayasena; Jung Min Heo
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2022-04-22

7.  Effects of Lactobacillus reuteri and Streptomyces coelicolor on Growth Performance of Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  Sarayu Bhogoju; Collins N Khwatenge; Thyneice Taylor-Bowden; Gabriel Akerele; Boniface M Kimathi; Joseph Donkor; Samuel N Nahashon
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-06-21

8.  Fermented wheat bran by xylanase-producing Bacillus cereus boosts the intestinal microflora of broiler chickens.

Authors:  Yan Feng; Lei Wang; Ajab Khan; Rui Zhao; Siang Wei; Xiaoyuan Jing
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Effects of Dietary Bacillus and Non-starch Polysaccharase on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Associated Changes on the Growth Performance, Intestinal Morphology, and Serum Antioxidant Profiles in Ducks.

Authors:  Simin Peng; Xin Wang; Yuyu Wang; Tuo Lv; Haohan Zhao; Yanzhou Wang; Siyuan Zhu; Huajiao Qiu; Jianguo Zeng; Qiuzhong Dai; Qian Lin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.