| Literature DB >> 29053787 |
Anny Devoy1, Bernadett Kalmar2, Michelle Stewart3, Heesoon Park1, Beverley Burke1, Suzanna J Noy1, Yushi Redhead1, Jack Humphrey1,4, Kitty Lo1,4, Julian Jaeger1, Alan Mejia Maza1, Prasanth Sivakumar1, Cinzia Bertolin5, Gianni Soraru5, Vincent Plagnol4, Linda Greensmith2,6, Abraham Acevedo Arozena3,7, Adrian M Isaacs1,8, Benjamin Davies9, Pietro Fratta2, Elizabeth M C Fisher1.
Abstract
Mutations in FUS are causative for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with a dominant mode of inheritance. In trying to model FUS-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in mouse it is clear that FUS is dosage-sensitive and effects arise from overexpression per se in transgenic strains. Novel models are required that maintain physiological levels of FUS expression and that recapitulate the human disease-with progressive loss of motor neurons in heterozygous animals. Here, we describe a new humanized FUS-ALS mouse with a frameshift mutation, which fulfils both criteria: the FUS Delta14 mouse. Heterozygous animals express mutant humanized FUS protein at physiological levels and have adult onset progressive motor neuron loss and denervation of neuromuscular junctions. Additionally, we generated a novel antibody to the unique human frameshift peptide epitope, allowing specific identification of mutant FUS only. Using our new FUSDelta14 ALS mouse-antibody system we show that neurodegeneration occurs in the absence of FUS protein aggregation. FUS mislocalization increases as disease progresses, and mutant FUS accumulates at the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Further, transcriptomic analyses show progressive changes in ribosomal protein levels and mitochondrial function as early disease stages are initiated. Thus, our new physiological mouse model has provided novel insight into the early pathogenesis of FUS-ALS.Entities:
Keywords: ALS; Delta14; FUS; humanization; mouse
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29053787 PMCID: PMC5841203 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awx248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain ISSN: 0006-8950 Impact factor: 13.501
Figure 1The humanized FUS Delta14 mouse expresses endogenous levels of FUS protein. (A) Schematic of the modified FUS locus. An A to G point mutation was introduced into the 5’ splice junction of exon 14 (red arrow) and the coding sequence of exon 15 was converted to the human FUS sequence (red box) to ensure production of the correct frameshifted protein, as shown in B. gDNA = genomic DNA. Protein coding sequence is shown in dark grey and untranslated regions are shown in light grey. (B) The wild-type mouse coding sequence of exon 15 does not produce the same peptide sequence as seen in human when exon 14 is skipped due to the splicing mutation; the mouse sequence lacks the early frameshift stop codon, and so would generate a 64-residue nonsense peptide, rather than the 14 residues for the human frameshift peptide. The 15-amino acid peptide used to generate a frameshift FUS-specific antibody (fsFUS) matches the human frameshift sequence. (C) Representative immunoblot from wild-type and heterozygous FUS Delta14 spinal cord showing endogenous levels of FUS protein. The novel frameshift-FUS antibody ‘Delta14’ specifically recognizes only FUS Delta14 protein. (D–F) The N-terminal antibody was used to quantify relative amounts of FUS in wild-type and heterozygous FUSDelta14 spinal cord. (D) No difference in total FUS protein was found between wild-type and heterozygous FUS Delta14 mice. (E) FUS Delta14 mice have approximately half as much wild-type FUS protein as their wild-type littermates (P = 0.0168). (F) The wild-type and mutant alleles in FUSDelta14 heterozygotes produce equal amounts of FUS protein. Together, these results show wild-type and heterozygous FUSDelta14 mice have equivalent endogenous levels of FUS protein.
Figure 2FUS Delta14 mice develop progressive motor degeneration. (A) FUS Delta14 mice show a progressive increase in hindlimb errors (missing ladder rung) during Locotronic tests (horizontal ladder). P = 0.039, n = 22 wild-type (11 males and 11 females) and 20 Delta14 mice (9 males and 11 females). (B) FUS Delta14 mice have a mild alteration in hindlimb gait by 18 months of age, with a reduced duration of hindlimb in swing phase. P = 0.021, n = 20 wild-type (10 males and 10 females) and 19 FUS Delta14 mice (seven males and 12 females). (C) Heterozygous FUS Delta14 mice show a small but significant reduction in lifespan. Kaplan-Meier LogRank (Mantel-Cox) survival, P = 0.033, n = 30 wild-type (15 males and 15 females) and 30 FUS Delta14 mice (15 males and 15 females). Graph does not include deaths from general welfare concerns associated with all inbred strains. (D) Examples of motor unit recording from extensor digitorum muscle of wild-type and heterozygous FUS Delta14 mice at 18 months of age. (E) There are significantly fewer motor units in the extensor digitorum muscle of FUS Delta14 mice compared to wild-type littermates. P = 0.0022, n = 6 per genotype, males only. (F) The proportion of fully innervated endplates decreased significantly in FUS Delta14 mice compared to wild-type littermates. P = 0.028, n = 6 per genotype, males only. (G) No motor neuron loss is observed in the L3–4 lumbar spinal cord of FUS Delta14 mice at 3 months of age, ruling out developmental differences in the lumbar motor pool; n = 5 per genotype. (H) At 12 months of age there is a 14% loss of motor neurons in the lumbar spinal cord of FUS Delta14 mice compared to wild-type littermates. P = 0.035, n = 5 wild-type and 7 FUS Delta14 mice. (I) By 18 months of age, 20% of motor neurons have been lost in the lumbar spinal cord of FUS Delta14 mice compared to wild-type littermates. P = 0.006, n = 6 per genotype. Scale bar = 20 µm. MN = motor neuron.
Figure 3FUS Delta14 protein mislocalizes to the cytoplasm but does not aggregate. (A) Using a C-terminal FUS antibody that detects only wild-type FUS (magenta) and our novel mutant-specific FUS antibody (fsFUS, white) to quantify the distribution of FUS protein in lumbar motor neurons. Perinuclear accumulations of fsFUS are observed (arrow). (B) Quantification of distribution of wild-type FUS protein in the nucleus versus cytoplasm of motor neurons in wild-type versus heterozygous FUS Delta14 mice. Wild-type FUS is located almost exclusively in the nucleus in both wild-type and FUS Delta14 mice, with significantly less nuclear wild-type FUS in FUS Delta14 motor neurons (P = 0.0049). (C) Quantification of distribution of FUS Delta14 protein in the nucleus versus cytoplasm of motor neurons in heterozygous FUS Delta14 mice. There is significantly more cytoplasmic FUS Delta14 protein compared to nuclear protein, although 25% of FUS Delta14 protein is nuclear in spite of the lack of the nuclear localization signal (P < 0.0001). The distribution of FUS changes with age in Delta14 mice. (D) No differences in the cytoplasmic:nuclear ratio were observed between 3 and 18 months of age for the distribution of wild-type FUS protein in wild-type mice. However, there was a significant increase in the cytoplasmic:nuclear ratio of wild-type FUS protein in heterozygous FUS Delta14 mice (P = 0.0062). (E) There is an increase in cytoplasmic:nuclear ratio of mutant FUS protein at 18 months of age in heterozygous FUS Delta14 mice (P = 0.0486). (F) There is no insoluble FUS protein present in the lumbar spinal cord of 12-month-old wild-type and heterozygous FUS Delta14 mice. SOD1 G93A spinal cord was used as a positive control (data not shown). Mutant FUS protein is preferentially recruited into stress granules. (G) In wild-type and heterozygous adult mouse fibroblasts almost no wild-type FUS protein (wtFUS, magenta) is detected in cytoplasmic stress granules. However, in heterozygous FUS Delta14 fibroblasts a significant proportion of cytoplasmic frameshift FUS protein (fsFUS, white) co-localizes with the stress granule marker G3BP, green. (H) Human fibroblasts with a frameshift mutation in FUS (G496Gfs), which have the same frameshift peptide sequence at the C-terminus that is recognized by our novel frameshift FUS antibody (fsFUS, white), show the same recruitment of cytoplasmic frameshift FUS protein to stress granules (G3BP, green) as observed in FUS Delta14 adult mouse fibroblasts. Recruitment of wild-type FUS protein to stress granules is limited (wtFUS, magenta). Scale bar = 20 µm.
Figure 4Heterozygous FUS Delta14 mice have alteration of mitochondria and ribosomes. (A and B) Volcano plots of differential expression in spinal cord at (A) 3 months and (B) 12 months of age. Genes with adjusted P-values (FDR) < 0.1 are marked in red (upregulated) and blue (downregulated). n = 4 per genotype. (C) Representative chart of GO term pathway enrichment analysis in genes dysregulated at 12 months of age in FUS Delta14 compared to wild-type littermates. Genes associated with mitochondria, ribosomes and the proteasome are significantly enriched. These genes are predominantly downregulated (blue), rather than upregulated (red). The full table of enriched GO terms with P-values is in Supplementary Table 1. (D) Using our novel mutant-specific FUS antibody that only recognizes frameshift FUS protein (fsFUS, white), we observe significant accumulation at the RER (Pearson correlation 0.415). The RER was delineated by an antibody to the ribosomal protein S6 (green). Wild-type FUS was detected with a c-terminal FUS antibody (magenta). 18 months of age, n = 6 per genotype.