Literature DB >> 29053781

An image-computable psychophysical spatial vision model.

Heiko H Schütt1,2, Felix A Wichmann1,3,4.   

Abstract

A large part of classical visual psychophysics was concerned with the fundamental question of how pattern information is initially encoded in the human visual system. From these studies a relatively standard model of early spatial vision emerged, based on spatial frequency and orientation-specific channels followed by an accelerating nonlinearity and divisive normalization: contrast gain-control. Here we implement such a model in an image-computable way, allowing it to take arbitrary luminance images as input. Testing our implementation on classical psychophysical data, we find that it explains contrast detection data including the ModelFest data, contrast discrimination data, and oblique masking data, using a single set of parameters. Leveraging the advantage of an image-computable model, we test our model against a recent dataset using natural images as masks. We find that the model explains these data reasonably well, too. To explain data obtained at different presentation durations, our model requires different parameters to achieve an acceptable fit. In addition, we show that contrast gain-control with the fitted parameters results in a very sparse encoding of luminance information, in line with notions from efficient coding. Translating the standard early spatial vision model to be image-computable resulted in two further insights: First, the nonlinear processing requires a denser sampling of spatial frequency and orientation than optimal coding suggests. Second, the normalization needs to be fairly local in space to fit the data obtained with natural image masks. Finally, our image-computable model can serve as tool in future quantitative analyses: It allows optimized stimuli to be used to test the model and variants of it, with potential applications as an image-quality metric. In addition, it may serve as a building block for models of higher level processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29053781     DOI: 10.1167/17.12.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  13 in total

1.  Predicting the Partition of Behavioral Variability in Speed Perception with Naturalistic Stimuli.

Authors:  Benjamin M Chin; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Fixational eye movements enable robust edge detection.

Authors:  Lynn Schmittwilken; Marianne Maertens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

3.  What is visible across the visual field?

Authors:  Andrew M Haun
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2021-06-01

4.  Derivatives and inverse of cascaded linear+nonlinear neural models.

Authors:  M Martinez-Garcia; P Cyriac; T Batard; M Bertalmío; J Malo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Searchers adjust their eye-movement dynamics to target characteristics in natural scenes.

Authors:  Lars O M Rothkegel; Heiko H Schütt; Hans A Trukenbrod; Felix A Wichmann; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Selectivity and robustness of sparse coding networks.

Authors:  Dylan M Paiton; Charles G Frye; Sheng Y Lundquist; Joel D Bowen; Ryan Zarcone; Bruno A Olshausen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Constrained sampling from deep generative image models reveals mechanisms of human target detection.

Authors:  Ingo Fruend
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Asymmetries in visual acuity around the visual field.

Authors:  Antoine Barbot; Shutian Xue; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Asymmetries around the visual field: From retina to cortex to behavior.

Authors:  Eline R Kupers; Noah C Benson; Marisa Carrasco; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Perceptual Dominance in Brief Presentations of Mixed Images: Human Perception vs. Deep Neural Networks.

Authors:  Liron Z Gruber; Aia Haruvi; Ronen Basri; Michal Irani
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.