| Literature DB >> 29053591 |
Qingzhao Kong1, Hongli Chen2, Yi-Lung Mo3, Gangbing Song4.
Abstract
A quantitative understanding of soil water content or soil water status is of great importance to many applications, such as landslide monitoring, rockfill dam health monitoring, precision agriculture, etc. In this paper, a feasibility study was conducted to monitor the soil water content in real time using permanent embedded piezoceramic-based transducers called smart aggregates (SAs). An active sensing approach using a customized swept acoustic wave with a frequency range between 100 Hz and 300 kHz was used to study the wave attenuation in the soil in correlation to soil moisture levels. Two sandy soil specimens, each embedded with a pair of SAs, were made in the laboratory, and the water percentage of the soil specimens was incrementally decreased from 15% to 3% during the tests. Due to the change of the soil water status, the damping property of the soil correspondingly changes. The change of the damping property results in the variation of the acoustic wave attenuation ratios. A wavelet packet-based energy index was adopted to compute the energy of the signal captured by the SA sensor. Experimental results show a parabolic growth curve of the received signal energy vs. the water percentage of the soil. The feasibility, sensitivity, and reliability of the proposed method for in-situ monitoring of soil water status were discussed.Entities:
Keywords: active sensing; piezoceramic transducers; real time monitoring; soil water content monitoring; wavelet packet analysis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29053591 PMCID: PMC5676600 DOI: 10.3390/s17102395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Shear mode SA: (a) the structure of a shear mode SA, (b) a photo of a shear mode SA.
Figure 2Preparation of the sandy soil. (a) Dry sand, (b) Sand soil (15% water content).
Figure 3Sandy soil specimen and the location of SAs in the specimen. (a) Sandy soil specimen, (b) Location of the SAs in the sandy soil specimen.
Figure 4Experimental setup.
Figure 5Time-domain signal response of the two test specimens. (a) Specimen 1, (b) Specimen 2.
Figure 6Wavelet packet-based energy index. (a) Specimen 1, (b) Specimen 2.