Literature DB >> 29053406

Super-Resolution Nanoscopy Imaging Applied to DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

Sofia D'Abrantes1, Sarah Gratton1, Pamela Reynolds2, Verena Kriechbaumer3, Joseph McKenna3, Stephen Barnard4, Dave T Clarke1, Stanley W Botchway1.   

Abstract

Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is continuously being damaged by endogenous processes such as metabolism or by exogenous events such as radiation. The specific phosphorylation of histone H2AX on serine residue 139, described as γ-H2AX, is an excellent indicator or marker of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The yield of γ-H2AX (foci) is shown to have some correlation with the dose of radiation or other DSB-causing agents. However, there is some discrepancy in the DNA DSB foci yield among imaging and other methods such as gel electrophoresis. Super-resolution imaging techniques are now becoming widely used as essential tools in biology and medicine, after a slow uptake of their development almost two decades ago. Here we compare several super-resolution techniques used to image and determine the amount and spatial distribution of γ-H2AX foci formation after X-ray irradiation: stimulated emission depletion (STED), ground-state depletion microscopy followed by individual molecule return (GSDIM), structured illumination microscopy (SIM), as well as an improved confocal, Airyscan and HyVolution 2. We show that by using these super-resolution imaging techniques with as low as 30-nm resolution, each focus may be further resolved, thus increasing the number of foci per radiation dose compared to standard microscopy. Furthermore, the DNA repair proteins 53BP1 (after low-LET irradiations) and Ku70/Ku80 (from laser microbeam irradiation) do not always yield a significantly increased number of foci when imaged by the super-resolution techniques, suggesting that γ-H2AX, 53PB1 and Ku70/80 repair proteins do not fully co-localize on the units of higher order chromatin structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29053406     DOI: 10.1667/RR14594.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  5 in total

Review 1.  Contribution of advanced fluorescence nano microscopy towards revealing mitotic chromosome structure.

Authors:  S W Botchway; S Farooq; A Sajid; I K Robinson; M Yusuf
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Constricted migration increases DNA damage and independently represses cell cycle.

Authors:  Charlotte R Pfeifer; Yuntao Xia; Kuangzheng Zhu; Dazhen Liu; Jerome Irianto; Victor M Morales García; Leeza M Santiago Millán; Brandon Niese; Shane Harding; Dan Deviri; Roger A Greenberg; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.138

3.  Dosimetry of heavy ion exposure to human cells using nanoscopic imaging of double strand break repair protein clusters.

Authors:  Judith Reindl; P Kundrat; S Girst; M Sammer; B Schwarz; G Dollinger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Downstream events initiated by expression of FSHD-associated DUX4: Studies of nucleocytoplasmic transport, γH2AX accumulation, and Bax/Bak-dependence.

Authors:  Isabel F Masteika; Anvitha Sathya; Sachiko Homma; Bess M Miller; Frederick M Boyce; Jeffrey Boone Miller
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.422

Review 5.  Interactions of neuroimmune signaling and glutamate plasticity in addiction.

Authors:  Cassandra D Gipson; Scott Rawls; Michael D Scofield; Benjamin M Siemsen; Emma O Bondy; Erin E Maher
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 8.322

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.