I A E Bollen1, J van der Velden2. 1. Physiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Physiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.vandervelden@vumc.nl.
In this issue of the Netherlands Heart Journal, van der Linde et al. describe a novel Dutch founder mutation (MYH7
) in MYH7, the gene encoding myosin heavy chain 7, leading to cardiomyopathy and congenital heart defects [1].Van der Linde et al. showed that the MYH7
mutation resulted in predominantly dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) but was also present in patients suffering from peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), non-compaction cardiomyopathy (NCCM) and congenital heart defects [1]. Mutations in many different genes have been implicated to be causal to DCM [2]. However, the same genes are often also implicated in the onset of other cardiomyopathies such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), NCCM or restrictive cardiomyopathy [2]. It is therefore difficult to understand how these mutations contribute to the onset of disease and why one gene mutation causes diverse cardiomyopathy phenotypes. This is especially the case for mutations in MYH7 which has been suggested to be an important gene in HCM as well as DCM pathogenesis.Gene variants can be benign and it is often difficult to establish which variants are pathogenic. The Exome
Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) has recently re-assessed various mutations assumed to be causal to the onset of cardiomyopathy
[3]. According to the ExAC, many variants previously assumed to be causal in DCM
such as mutations in MYH6, SCN5A and MYBPC3 were not
found in excess in the DCM population compared with ~60,000 controls, making it unlikely that they played a role in theonset of DCM [3]. MYH7 variants were greatly enriched in the HCM population compared with the ExAC controls with rare variants in MYH7 being accountable for 14.2% of the variation observed in HCM [3]. The prevalence of variants in the MYH7 gene was slightly higher (5.3%) in the DCM population compared with ExAC controls which implies that variants found in MYH7 are possible disease-causing mutations in DCM [3]. The MYH7
mutation described by van der Linde et al. was absent in ExAC controls [1]. The MYH7
mutation seems to be more associated with DCM than HCM as shown by van der Linde et al. [1].One factor that is important in the pathogenic effects of mutations is the location of the mutation. For example, mutations causal to HCM are enriched in the part of the MYH7 gene encoding the myosin head domain, while MYH7 mutations related to DCM are more disperse across the entire MYH7 gene [3]. The MYH7
mutation is located in exon 39, the C‑terminus of the protein encoding the tail domain. Pathogenic effects of mutations located in the globular head domain affect cross-bridge kinetics of contraction and energy consumption [4, 5] and stiffness of myosin heads [6]. The MYH7
mutation is likely to exert its pathogenic effect in another manner. Considering the location of the mutation in the coiled-coil rod region, the most likely pathogenic affects would be impairment of the incorporation of myosin into the myofilaments or binding to titin [7]. However, functional studies are needed in order to confirm the true pathogenic effect of this mutation.Van der Linde et al. describe a relatively benign course in patients carrying the MYH7
mutation [1]. This makes it likely that the pathogenic effect of the mutation is also mild. Therefore, it might be possible that the MYH7
mutation acts as a disease modifier in which cellular dysfunction is aggravated leading to onset of disease, an earlier onset of disease, or progression of the disease. This could also explain why the mutation was found in DCM, PPCM, NCCM and congenital heart diseasepatients and why some patients were very young. If this is the case, a second disease hit is likely to be present contributing to the onset of disease. The study by van der Linde et al. showed a disease penetrance of 47.7% among mutation carriers [1], which implies the mutation, like many other reported mutations, is not the sole cause of disease.Studies assessing the prevalence of mutations in large cohorts such as the current study give important insight into the prevalence of genetic variants, the likelihood of pathogenicity, and their effects on disease presentation. This information is needed to improve risk assessment in mutation carriers and patient counseling.
Authors: B Seebohm; F Matinmehr; J Köhler; A Francino; F Navarro-Lopéz; A Perrot; C Ozcelik; W J McKenna; B Brenner; T Kraft Journal: Biophys J Date: 2009-08-05 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Roddy Walsh; Kate L Thomson; James S Ware; Birgit H Funke; Jessica Woodley; Karen J McGuire; Francesco Mazzarotto; Edward Blair; Anneke Seller; Jenny C Taylor; Eric V Minikel; Daniel G MacArthur; Martin Farrall; Stuart A Cook; Hugh Watkins Journal: Genet Med Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Marieke Bloemink; John Deacon; Stephen Langer; Carlos Vera; Ariana Combs; Leslie Leinwand; Michael A Geeves Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: I H M van der Linde; Y L Hiemstra; R Bökenkamp; A M van Mil; M H Breuning; C Ruivenkamp; S W Ten Broeke; R F Veldkamp; J I van Waning; M A van Slegtenhorst; K Y van Spaendonck-Zwarts; R H Lekanne Deprez; J C Herkert; L Boven; P A van der Zwaag; J D H Jongbloed; M Bootsma; D Q C M Barge-Schaapveld Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 2.380
Authors: Daniela Ramaccini; Vanessa Montoya-Uribe; Femke J Aan; Lorenzo Modesti; Yaiza Potes; Mariusz R Wieckowski; Irena Krga; Marija Glibetić; Paolo Pinton; Carlotta Giorgi; Michelle L Matter Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol Date: 2021-01-12
Authors: Katarina Hadova; Eva Kralova; Gabriel Doka; Lenka Bies Pivackova; Zuzana Kmecova; Peter Krenek; Jan Klimas Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 2.298