Literature DB >> 29052791

Potential diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and tumor markers in differentiating combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma.

Xiao-Wen Huang1, Yang Huang1, Li-da Chen1, Zhu Wang1, Zheng Yang2, Jin-Ya Liu1, Xiao-Yan Xie1, Ming-De Lu1, Shun-Li Shen3, Wei Wang4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the combination of tumor markers [alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9)] and imaging features in differentiating combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC).
METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with pathologically proven CHC were retrospectively evaluated with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Additionally, 40 HCC and 40 CC patients who were randomly selected from the same period served as a control group. Images were classified as HCC-like or CC-like pattern according to CEUS guidelines recommended by World and European Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB-EFSUMB). The diagnostic criteria of CHC were defined as follows: (1) both AFP and CA19-9 are simultaneously elevated (AFP > 20 ng/ml and CA19-9 > 100 units/ml); or (2) elevated AFP with a CC-like pattern on CEUS and without elevated CA19-9 level; or (3) elevated CA19-9 with an HCC-like pattern on CEUS and without elevated AFP level. The diagnostic tests were performed with calculation of the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
RESULTS: For the 40 CHC patients, the rates of elevated AFP and CA19-9 serology were 55.0 and 30.0%, respectively. Twenty-three (57.5%) patients exhibited an HCC-like pattern, and 15 (37.5%) showed a CC-like pattern. After applying the above diagnostic criteria of CHC in the 120 patients, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and AUC were 32.5, 93.8, 72.2, 73.5, 73.3, and 0.631%, respectively. When the actual prevalence rate (0.4-14.3%) was taken into account, the PPV and NPV were modified from 2.1 to 46.7% and 89.3 to 99.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The combination of enhancement patterns on CEUS and serum tumor markers (AFP and CA19-9) may be a potentially specific diagnostic method to differentiate CHC from HCC and CC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpha-fetoprotein; Carbohydrate antigen 19-9; Combined hepatocellular–cholangiocarcinoma; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Differential diagnosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29052791     DOI: 10.1007/s10396-017-0834-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)        ISSN: 1346-4523            Impact factor:   1.314


  44 in total

1.  Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors investigated by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G Lin; C-H Toh; R-C Wu; S-F Ko; S-H Ng; W-C Chou; J-H Tseng
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Shailender Singh; Subhankar Chakraborty; Neelima Bonthu; Stanley Radio; Shahid M Hussain; Aaron Sasson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Contrast-enhanced 3D ultrasonography in minute hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Masao Ohto; Ryu Ito; Nei Soma; Hiroyuki Fukuda; Yasushi Shinohara; Akio Sakamoto; Fukuo Kondo
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  A clinicopathological study on combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  J Taguchi; O Nakashima; M Tanaka; T Hisaka; T Takazawa; M Kojiro
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.029

5.  Combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma: correlation between CT findings and clinicopathological features.

Authors:  Y Fukukura; J Taguchi; O Nakashima; Y Wada; M Kojiro
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 6.  Management of combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  W T Kassahun; J Hauss
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Surgical treatment of patients with mixed hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  S Nakamura; S Suzuki; T Sakaguchi; A Serizawa; H Konno; S Baba; S Baba; H Muro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: clinical features and computed tomographic findings.

Authors:  K Aoki; K Takayasu; T Kawano; Y Muramatsu; N Moriyama; F Wakao; J Yamamoto; K Shimada; T Takayama; T Kosuge
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Etiologic factors and clinical presentation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Differences between cirrhotic and noncirrhotic Italian patients.

Authors:  F Trevisani; P E D'Intino; P Caraceni; M Pizzo; G F Stefanini; A Mazziotti; G L Grazi; G Gozzetti; G Gasbarrini; M Bernardi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update.

Authors:  Jordi Bruix; Morris Sherman
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 17.425

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Predictive Value of Staging Systems and Inflammation Scores for Patients with Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarcinoma After Surgical Resection: a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Chaobin He; Yize Mao; Jun Wang; Yunda Song; Xin Huang; Xiaojun Lin; Shengping Li
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS in Association With Serum Biomarkers for Differentiation of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma From Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yan Zhou; Shanshan Yin; Lin Zhao; Xiang Zhang; Meng Li; Jianmin Ding; Kun Yan; Xiang Jing
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Clinical Significance of Preoperative Serum CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 Levels in Predicting the Resectability of Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tianyi Fang; Hao Wang; Yunfu Cui; Zhidong Wang; Yufu Wang; Xuan Lin
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 4.  Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 - tumor marker: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Tsinrong Lee; Thomas Zheng Jie Teng; Vishal G Shelat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-12-27

5.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in association with serum biomarkers for differentiating combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Ya-Han Zhang; Jia-Wu Li; Ying-Yu Shi; Jia-Yan Huang; Yan Luo; Ji-Bin Liu; Qiang Lu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Preoperative Differentiation of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma From Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Nomogram Based on Ultrasonographic Features and Clinical Indicators.

Authors:  Yanling Chen; Qing Lu; Weibin Zhang; Jiaying Cao; Yi Dong; Wenping Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Differentiation between combined hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of diagnostic performance between ultrasomics-based model and CEUS LI-RADS v2017.

Authors:  Chao-Qun Li; Xin Zheng; Huan-Ling Guo; Mei-Qing Cheng; Yang Huang; Xiao-Yan Xie; Ming-de Lu; Ming Kuang; Wei Wang; Li-da Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.795

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.