PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether survivorship of multiple primary cancers (MPCs) is associated with psychological distress, positive health behaviors, and benefit finding. . DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the 2010 Livestrong cross-sectional survey. . SETTING: Online survey. . SAMPLE: 238 MPC survivors and 3,295 single cancer survivors. . METHODS: Chi-square and t tests for group comparisons were used. Multivariate linear regression, adjusted for covariates, was used to determine associations between variables. . MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: MPC versus single cancer; psychological distress, health behavior (healthy lifestyle and positive healthcare utilization), and benefit-finding scores. . FINDINGS: Survivors of MPCs (compared to single cancer survivors) were significantly older, less likely to have a spouse or partner, further out from original cancer diagnosis, and less likely to be employed full-time, and they differed by cancer diagnoses and survivorship stage. Having MPCs was associated with significantly higher psychological distress and healthcare utilization but not healthy lifestyle or benefit finding. . CONCLUSIONS: Relative to those with single cancers, MPC survivors are at increased risk for psychological distress and are more likely to receive recommended cancer screenings. Additional research is needed to understand mechanisms surrounding psychological distress in MPC survivors. . IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Targeted distress screening in MPC survivors may allow for early identification and interventions to ameliorate distress and reduce negative downstream health effects.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether survivorship of multiple primary cancers (MPCs) is associated with psychological distress, positive health behaviors, and benefit finding. . DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the 2010 Livestrong cross-sectional survey. . SETTING: Online survey. . SAMPLE: 238 MPC survivors and 3,295 single cancer survivors. . METHODS: Chi-square and t tests for group comparisons were used. Multivariate linear regression, adjusted for covariates, was used to determine associations between variables. . MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: MPC versus single cancer; psychological distress, health behavior (healthy lifestyle and positive healthcare utilization), and benefit-finding scores. . FINDINGS: Survivors of MPCs (compared to single cancer survivors) were significantly older, less likely to have a spouse or partner, further out from original cancer diagnosis, and less likely to be employed full-time, and they differed by cancer diagnoses and survivorship stage. Having MPCs was associated with significantly higher psychological distress and healthcare utilization but not healthy lifestyle or benefit finding. . CONCLUSIONS: Relative to those with single cancers, MPC survivors are at increased risk for psychological distress and are more likely to receive recommended cancer screenings. Additional research is needed to understand mechanisms surrounding psychological distress in MPC survivors. . IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Targeted distress screening in MPC survivors may allow for early identification and interventions to ameliorate distress and reduce negative downstream health effects.
Entities:
Keywords:
benefit finding; cancer survivorship; health behaviors; multiple primary cancers; psychological distress
Authors: Nikki A Hawkins; Tenbroeck Smith; Luhua Zhao; Juan Rodriguez; Zahava Berkowitz; Kevin D Stein Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Felicity W K Harper; John E Schmidt; Abbie O Beacham; John M Salsman; Alyssa J Averill; Kristi D Graves; Michael A Andrykowski Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Rochelle E Curtis; Stephen F Kry; Ethel Gilbert; Stephanie Lamart; Christine D Berg; Marilyn Stovall; Elaine Ron Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Melissa S Y Thong; Floortje Mols; Rob H A Verhoeven; Lifang Liu; Michael A Andrykowski; Jan A Roukema; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2012-12-02 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: M Tish Knobf; Mary E Cooley; Sonia Duffy; Ardith Doorenbos; Linda Eaton; Barbara Given; Deborah K Mayer; Ruth McCorkle; Christine Miaskowski; Sandra Mitchell; Paula Sherwood; Catherine Bender; Janine Cataldo; Denise Hershey; Maria Katapodi; Usha Menon; Karen Schumacher; Virginia Sun; Diane Von Ah; Geri LoBiondo-Wood; Gail Mallory Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Kimberly D Miller; Rebecca L Siegel; Chun Chieh Lin; Angela B Mariotto; Joan L Kramer; Julia H Rowland; Kevin D Stein; Rick Alteri; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 508.702