| Literature DB >> 29052540 |
Alba Mir-Cros, Gema Codina, M Teresa Martín-Gómez, Anna Fàbrega, Xavier Martínez, Mireia Jané, Diego Van Esso, Thais Cornejo, Carlos Rodrigo, Magda Campins, Tomàs Pumarola, Juan José González-López.
Abstract
We describe the detection of Bordetella holmesii as a cause of whooping cough in Spain. Prevalence was 3.9% in 2015, doubling to 8.8% in 2016. This emergence raises concern regarding the contribution of B. holmesii to the reemergence of whooping cough and the effectiveness of the pertussis vaccine.Entities:
Keywords: Barcelona; Bordetella holmesii; Bordetella pertussis; Codina G; Fàbrega A; Jané M; Martín-Gómez MT; Martínez X; Spain; Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Nov [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2311.170960; Suggested citation for this article: Mir-Cros A; bacteria; bacterial infections; et al. Emergence of Bordetella holmesii as a causative agent of whooping cough; pertussis vaccine; respiratory infections; whooping cough
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29052540 PMCID: PMC5652430 DOI: 10.3201/eid2311.170960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
FigureTimeline distribution of the 391 whooping cough cases diagnosed at the Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, 2013–2016, showing Bordetella species detected.
Demographic, clinical, and epidemiologic characteristics of 16 patients with diagnosed whooping cough associated with Bordetella holmesii infection, Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, 2015–2016*
| Patient no. | Age, y/sex | No. vaccine doses received | Date last vaccine dose received | Diagnosis date | Treatment | Co-infections | Outbreak relatedness | Site of exposure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10/F | 5 | 2010 Mar 16 | 2015 Apr 17 | AZM |
| Yes | School |
| 2 | 12/F | 5 | 2008 Jul 18 | 2015 May 5 | AZM | ND | Yes | School† |
| 3 | 9/F | 5 | 2011 Dec 12 | 2015 May 13 | AZM | ND | Yes | School† |
| 4 | 13/F | 5 | 2007 Oct 23 | 2015 May 25 | AZM | ND | Yes | School† |
| 5 | 12/F | 5 | 2008 Sep 6 | 2015 Apr 6 | AZM |
| Yes | School |
| 6 | 28/F | UNK | UNK | 2015 Apr 6 | AZM |
| Yes | Home |
| 7 | 4/F | 4 | 2012 Mar 8 | 2015 Aug 14 | AZM | ND | Yes | School and home |
| 8 | 9/M | 5 | 2012 Oct 18 | 2016 Sep 3 | UNK | ND | Yes | School |
| 9 | 1/M | 2 | 2015 Jun 8 | 2016 April 13 | AZM |
| Yes | Home |
| 10 | 8/M | 5 | 2012 Jun 26 | 2016 Apr 21 | AZM | ND | Yes | School and home |
| 11 | 6/M | 4 | 2011 Aug 8 | 2016 Mar 5 | AZM |
| Yes | School |
| 12 | 40/F | UNK | UNK | 2016 Sep 5 | AZM | ND | UNK | UNK |
| 13 | 14/F | 3 | 2002 Aug 5 | 2016 May 24 | AZM | ND | No | – |
| 14 | 5/F | 4 | 2012 Mar 2 | 2016 Sep 6 | AZM | ND | Yes | School and home |
| 15 | 9/M | 5 | 2013 Sep 10 | 2016 Nov 7 | AZM | ND | Yes | School |
| 16 | 6/M | 4 | 2011 Feb 16 | 2016 Jul 28 | AZM |
| Yes | School |
*AZM, azithromycin; ND, not detected; UNK, unknown. †These 3 patients’ illnesses were related to the same school outbreak.
Comparison of demographic, vaccination-related, clinical characteristics between patients with Bordetella pertussis and B. holmesii infection, Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, 2015–2016*
| Characteristic | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Median age (range), y | 5.5 (0.08–74) | 9 (4–40) | 0.07 |
| Median pertussis vaccine doses received (range) | 4 (0–5) | 5 (3–5) | 0.21 |
| Median time from last pertussis vaccine dose received to date of diagnosis (range), y | 1.92 (0.08–11.70) | 3.82 (1.03–14.05) | 0.1 |
| Fever, no. (%) | 5 (12.5) | 1 (10) | 1 |
| Whoop, no. (%) | 9 (22.5) | 1 (10) | 0.66 |
| Paroxysms, no. (%) | 4 (10) | 1 (10) | 1 |
| Cough ≥14 d, no. (%) | 12 (30) | 4 (40) | 0.7 |
| Hospitalized, no. (%) | 4 (10) | 0 | 0.57 |
*Differences were assessed for significance using the chi-squared exact test (in comparison with independent qualitative variables) and the Mann-Whitney U-test (for quantitative variables; no normality was observed in data distribution). We selected a randomized sample of confirmed B. pertussis cases with a 4:1 relation with B. holmesii–infected patients as a comparison group. p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant at the 95% CI level.