Literature DB >> 29052111

Targeted massively parallel sequencing characterises the mutation spectrum of PALB2 in breast and ovarian cancer cases from Poland and Ukraine.

Aleksander Myszka1, Tu Nguyen-Dumont2,3, Pawel Karpinski4, Maria M Sasiadek4, Hayane Akopyan1,5, Fleur Hammet2, Helen Tsimiklis2, Daniel J Park2,6, Bernard J Pope6, Ryszard Slezak4, Nataliya Kitsera5, Aleksandra Siekierzynska7, Melissa C Southey8,9.   

Abstract

Loss-of-function germline mutations in the PALB2 gene are associated with an increase of breast cancer risk. The purpose of this study was to characterise the spectrum of PALB2 mutations in women affected with breast or ovarian cancer from South-West Poland and West Ukraine. We applied Hi-Plex, an amplicon-based enrichment method for targeted massively parallel sequencing, to screen the coding exons and proximal intron-exon junctions of PALB2 in germline DNA from unrelated women affected with breast cancer (n = 338) and ovarian cancer (n = 89) from Poland (n = 304) and Ukraine (n = 123). These women were at high-risk of carrying a genetic predisposition to breast and/or ovarian cancer due to a family history and/or early-onset disease. Targeted-sequencing identified two frameshift deletions: PALB2:c.509_510del; p.R170Ifs in three women affected with breast cancer and PALB2:c.172_175del;p.Q60Rfs in one woman affected with ovarian cancer. A number of other previously described missense (some predicted to be damaging by PolyPhen-2 and CADD) and synonymous mutations were also identified in this population. This study is consistent with previous reports that PALB2:c.509_510del and PALB2:c.172_175del are recurrent mutations associated with breast cancer predisposition in Polish women with a family history of the disease. Our study contributes to the accumulating evidence indicating that PALB2 should be included in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in these populations to enhance risk assessment and management of women at high-risk of developing breast cancer. This data could also contribute to ongoing work that is assessing the possible association between ovarian cancer risk and PALB2 mutations for which there is currently no evidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Genetic susceptibility; Massively parallel sequencing; Ovarian cancer; PALB2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29052111      PMCID: PMC5999175          DOI: 10.1007/s10689-017-0050-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


Background

Breast cancer risk associated with carrying PALB2 loss-of-function mutations is now well established. All published estimates of penetrance of PALB2 mutations (recently reviewed by us [1]) are comparable to the breast cancer risk associated with mutations in BRCA2: 45% (95% CI, 31–56%) [2]. By pooling international resources, the PALB2 Interest Group estimated that the average cumulative risk of breast cancer risk ranged from 33% (95% CI, 25–44%) for a female carrier without affected relatives to 58% (95% CI, 50–66%) for a female carrier with two first-degree relatives who had breast cancer diagnosed by 50 years of age [3]. There is currently no evidence for ovarian cancer risk to be associated with PALB2 loss-of-function mutations. Recent consolidated efforts including (i) those of the PALB2 Interest Group that estimated the relative risk for ovarian cancer to be 2.31 (95% CI, 0.77–6.97; p = 0.18), (ii) the assessment of two protein truncating mutations PALB2:c.1592delT; p.L531Cfs and PALB2:c.3113G > A;p.W1038* on iCOGS (OR 2.50, 95% CI, 0.21–29.1, p = 0.45 and OR 1.34, 95% CI, 0.36–4.97, p = 0.66, respectively) and (iii) a study of PALB2:c.509_510delGA and PALB2:c.172_175delTTGT in 344 Polish families with breast and ovarian cancer (OR 1.37, 95% CI, 0.17–10.7, p = 0.54) all failed to reach statistical significance [3-5]. This study aimed to apply massively parallel sequencing to characterise the mutation spectrum of PALB2 in women from South-West Poland and West Ukraine affected with breast or ovarian cancer.

Materials and methods

Subjects

Participants in this study were unrelated women diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer recruited after or during the oncological treatment from Wroclaw Medical University, Lower Silesia, Poland, between 2004 and 2008, or Lviv State Oncology Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Center, Lviv, Ukraine between 2004 and 2010. Genetic testing was requested when hereditary cancer was suspected (age of onset < 50, bilateral breast cancer, medullary or atypical breast cancer, more than one breast cancer in the family occurring in a first or second degree relative and ovarian cancer in any age). The time from cancer diagnosis to blood draw ranged from 1 to 12 months. The Polish cohort consisted of 226 women affected with breast cancer and 78 women affected with ovarian cancer. Of the 226 women with breast cancer, 85 had hereditary breast cancer, 17 had familial breast cancer and 124 were sporadic cases, according to the criteria described by Berliner et al. [6]. The majority of these women (n = 206, 91%) had been diagnosed with invasive cancer (ductal in 153, lobular in 30, medullary in 7, tubular in 5 cases, 11 patients had been diagnosed with other types of carcinoma). There were 20 cases of cancer in situ (ductal carcinoma in situ—DCIS in 19, lobular carcinoma in situ—LCIS in 1). Of the 78 Polish women with ovarian cancer, 11 had hereditary ovarian cancer, 10 had familial ovarian cancer and 57 were sporadic ovarian cancer cases. Thirty-eight patients had serous cancer, 15 had endometroid, 10 had mucinous, 2 had clear cell, 13 had adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified. Known carriers of Polish founder mutations in BRCA1 (c.5266dup, c.181T > G, c.4035del, c.68_69del) and in BRCA2 (c.5946delT) were excluded from this study. The Ukrainian cohort consisted of 112 women with breast cancer and 11 women with ovarian cancer. Seventy-four women affected with breast cancer were diagnosed with hereditary cancer and 38 with familial cancer. There were 78, 18 and 2 cases of invasive ductal, lobular and medullary breast cancers, respectively. Of the 11 Ukrainian women with ovarian cancer, two had moderately differentiated carcinoma, one had endometroid adenocarcinoma, one had serous papillary adenocarcinoma, one had low-grade differentiated adenocarcinoma and six had adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified. Additional information on the participants is presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Characteristics of the participants  of this study

Breast cancerOvarian cancer
Poland(n = 226)Ukraine(n = 112)Poland(n = 78)Ukraine(n = 11)
Age at diagnosis (years)49 (22–72)50 (28–79)53 (25–80)51 (31–65)
Relatives with breast cancer
 0148 (65%)24 (21%)61 (%)5 (45%)
 151 (23%)56 (50%)14 (%)6 (55%)
 2+27 (12%)32 (29%)3 (%)0 (0%)
Relatives with ovarian cancer
 0210 (93%)98 (86%)65 (%)6 (55%)
 113 (6%)12 (11%)10 (%)3 (27%)
 2+3 (1%)2 (2%)3 (%)2 (18%)
Invasive cancers
 GI14 (11%)NA8 (18%)NA
 GII65 (52%)NA18 (41%)NA
 GIII46 (37%)NA18 (41%)NA
In situ cancers
 GI1 (20%)NA
 GII2 (40%)NA
 GIII2 (40%)NA

NA data not available, GI grade I, GII grade II, GIII Grade III

Characteristics of the participants  of this study NA data not available, GI grade I, GII grade II, GIII Grade III All participants provided informed consent for participation in this research program, which was approved by the Commission of Bioethics of the Institute of Hereditary Pathology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, the Ethics Committee of Wroclaw Medical University (Poland), the Ethics Committee of University of Rzeszow (Poland) and the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (Melbourne, Australia).

Mutation screening

Amplicon-based massively parallel sequencing of the coding regions and proximal intron–exon junctions of PALB2 (NM_024675.3) was performed on lymphocytes-derived genomic DNA using the Hi-Plex protocol [7]. Massively parallel sequencing (150 bp paired-end) was performed on the MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Mapping to human reference build hg19 and variant calling were performed as described in [7, 8].

In-silico analysis

DNA sequence variant annotation (variant nomenclature and type, and dbSNP138 identifier) was performed using CAVA [9]. The probability that missense substitutions in PALB2 were damaging to protein function was assessed with PolyPhen-2 [10] and CADD [11]. The threshold for calling a missense variant damaging was the default for PolyPhen-2. The cutoff for CADD was 15, as recommended by the authors. Minor Allele Frequency (MAF) was obtained for non-Finnish European ancestry from the ExAC database [12].

Results

A total of 23 distinct PALB2 genetic variants were observed in the DNA from 427 women (Table 2). Two frameshift deletions resulting in predicted premature termination codons were identified: PALB2:c.509_510del; p.R170Ifs in three women affected with breast cancer and PALB2:c.172_175del;p.Q60Rfs in one woman affected with ovarian cancer.
Table 2

PALB2 variants identified by Hi-Plex targeted-sequencing, in 433 women affected with breast or ovarian cancer in South-West Poland and West Ukraine

HGVS_ca HGVS_pa dbSNPb MAF in ExACc PolyPhen-2d CADDe # Carriers
BCf OCg
Frameshifting deletionsc.172_175delp.Q60Rfs*701
c.509_510delp.R170Ifs*140.0001030
Missense substitutionsc.13C > Tp.P5Srs3770856770.00005B13.230
c.187C > Gp.L63V0.00001B0.01410
c.1010T > Cp.L337Srs454940920.01920B8.91863
c.1033T > Gp.L345VB3.47710
c.1544A > Gp.K515R0.00006B16.1610
c.1676A > Gp.Q559Rrs1524510.09550B0.0297517
c.2014G > Cp.E672Qrs455324400.02830B11.43245
c.2135C > Tp.A712Vrs1414587310.00040B12.201
c.2590C > Tp.P864Srs455683390.00410B12.0311
c.2773G > Cp.V925Lrs1801771250.00005B14.8310
c.2794G > Ap.V932Mrs456240360.00810D18.3142
c.2816T > Gp.L939Wh rs454781920.00160D20.911
c.2993G > Ap.G998Ers455516360.02140D22.7153
c.3508C > Tp.H1170Yrs2002833060.00010D16.9520
Synonymous substitutionsc.615A > Gp.E205E0.0000310
c.1194G > Ap.V398Vrs617551730.0012011
c.1281T > Cp.A427Ars1386977960.0000010
c.1572A > Gp.S524Srs454724000.0041010
c.1968A > Gp.P656P10
c.3252G > Ap.S1084Srs1415708330.0000410
c.3300T > Gp.T1100Trs455161000.02830235

aVariant nomenclature based on transcript sequence (NM_024675.3), + 1 as A of ATG start codon, according to the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS), HGVS_c for coding DNA and HGVS_p for protein variants.

bdbSNP 138

cMinor Allele Frequency (MAF) in ExAC Non-Finnish European population [12]

dPolyPhen-2 prediction: B, benign; D: damaging [10]

eCADD score [11]

f BC breast cancer

g OC ovarian cancer

hNo evidence for association with breast or ovarian cancer risk [4]

PALB2 variants identified by Hi-Plex targeted-sequencing, in 433 women affected with breast or ovarian cancer in South-West Poland and West Ukraine aVariant nomenclature based on transcript sequence (NM_024675.3), + 1 as A of ATG start codon, according to the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS), HGVS_c for coding DNA and HGVS_p for protein variants. bdbSNP 138 cMinor Allele Frequency (MAF) in ExAC Non-Finnish European population [12] dPolyPhen-2 prediction: B, benign; D: damaging [10] eCADD score [11] f BC breast cancer g OC ovarian cancer hNo evidence for association with breast or ovarian cancer risk [4] Of the 14 missense substitutions identified, four were predicted to be damaging by both PolyPhen-2 and CADD. The remaining variants were synonymous variants. No nonsense mutation or variant affecting consensus splice sites were detected. Two Polish women were identified as carriers of PALB2:c.509_510del. One of them had been diagnosed with invasive lobular breast carcinoma at 35 years of age. There was no other case of cancer reported in her family. The second Polish carrier of PALB2:c.509_510del had been diagnosed with mucinous carcinoma of the breast at 36 years of age. Other cancers in her family included her paternal grand-mother and aunt (breast cancer, unknown age of diagnoses) and cancer of the larynx in her father. The third carrier of PALB2:c.509_510del was diagnosed at 53 years with infiltrating ductal carcinoma. This woman’s mother had also been diagnosed with breast cancer at an unknown age. The carrier of PALB2:c.172_175del was a Polish woman diagnosed with papillary serous ovarian cancer at the age of 57 years. She had a family history of cancer that included lung cancer (brother diagnosed at 36 years), liver cancer (sister diagnosed at 60 years), mouth cancer (mother diagnosed at 69 years) and gastric cancer (maternal uncle diagnosed at 48 years).

Discussion–conclusion

Both frameshift deletions observed in this study have been reported previously to be recurrent in the Polish population. PALB2:c.509_510del was first identified by Dansonka-Mieszkowska et al. in a study of women with breast or ovarian cancer from South Poland [13]. They observed the deletion in 4/648 (0.6%) familial breast cancer cases and 1/1310 (0.08%) controls (p = 0.044). PALB2:c.172_175del was initially reported as a Czech Republic founder mutation (4/409 high-risk breast cancer cases) [14]. Further studies have confirmed that PALB2:c.509_510del and PALB2:c.172_175del are recurrent in the Polish population [15-17]. Cybulski et al. [17] estimated the odds ratios for risk of breast cancer for PALB2:c.509_510del carriers and PALB2:c.172_175del carriers to be 4.09 (95% CI 1·89–8·88; p < 0·0001) and 5.02 (1·55–16·2; p = 0·0016), respectively, consistent with breast cancer risk estimates obtained for PALB2:c.1592del;p.L531Cfs and PALB2:c.3113G > A;p.W1038* [4]. Ten-year survival for women with breast cancer and a PALB2 mutation was 48.0% (95% CI, 36.5–63.2%), compared with 74.7% (95% CI, 73.5–75.8%) for non-carriers (hazard ratio for death 2.27, 95% CI, 1.64–3.15; p < 0.0001) [5]. Most of the previous studies have applied genotyping to detect these deletions, except for [17], where whole-exome sequencing was performed on 144 women and identified three carriers. The present study is the first to apply massively parallel sequencing to assess the full spectrum of exonic and consensus splice site genetic variants in PALB2 in the population of South-West Poland and West Ukraine. Our findings further support that PALB2 should be included in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in these populations. For women who meet criteria for genetic testing in Poland, testing for the known Polish founder mutations in PALB2, together with Polish founder BRCA1 mutations could be recommended. For those found negative, gene-panel testing by massively parallel sequencing (next-generation sequencing) could be applied to facilitate risk assessment and management for these women at high-risk of developing breast cancer. Interpretation of the rare genetic variation observed in PALB2, especially the rare missense variants, is challenging. As discussed by us and others, there has been no evidence so far that rare missense variants in PALB2 are associated with increased risk of breast cancer [1, 18, 19]. The inclusion of PALB2 on gene-panel tests for breast cancer susceptibility will contribute to the accumulation of data that could be used to estimate cancer risks associated with missense variants in PALB2 (and other genes included on these panels), on a variant-by-variant basis.
  19 in total

1.  Mutations predisposing to breast cancer in 12 candidate genes in breast cancer patients from Poland.

Authors:  C Cybulski; J Lubiński; D Wokołorczyk; W Kuźniak; A Kashyap; V Sopik; T Huzarski; J Gronwald; T Byrski; M Szwiec; A Jakubowska; B Górski; T Dębniak; S A Narod; M R Akbari
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 2.  Growing recognition of the role for rare missense substitutions in breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Sean V Tavtigian; Georgia Chenevix-Trench
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.851

3.  Mutation screening of PALB2 in clinically ascertained families from the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Tú Nguyen-Dumont; Fleur Hammet; Maryam Mahmoodi; Helen Tsimiklis; Zhi L Teo; Roger Li; Bernard J Pope; Mary Beth Terry; Saundra S Buys; Mary Daly; John L Hopper; Ingrid Winship; David E Goldgar; Daniel J Park; Melissa C Southey
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2.

Authors:  Ivan Adzhubei; Daniel M Jordan; Shamil R Sunyaev
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01

5.  Prevalence of PALB2 mutation c.509_510delGA in unselected breast cancer patients from Central and Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Monika Noskowicz; Natalia Bogdanova; Marina Bermisheva; Zalina Takhirova; Natalia Antonenkova; Elza Khusnutdinova; Michael Bremer; Hans Christiansen; Tjoung-Won Park-Simon; Peter Hillemanns; Thilo Dörk
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  The PALB2 gene is a strong candidate for clinical testing in BRCA1- and BRCA2-negative hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Marketa Janatova; Zdenek Kleibl; Jana Stribrna; Ales Panczak; Kamila Vesela; Martina Zimovjanova; Petra Kleiblova; Pavel Dundr; Jana Soukupova; Petr Pohlreich
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2.

Authors:  Antonis C Antoniou; Silvia Casadei; Tuomas Heikkinen; Daniel Barrowdale; Katri Pylkäs; Jonathan Roberts; Andrew Lee; Deepak Subramanian; Kim De Leeneer; Florentia Fostira; Eva Tomiak; Susan L Neuhausen; Zhi L Teo; Sofia Khan; Kristiina Aittomäki; Jukka S Moilanen; Clare Turnbull; Sheila Seal; Arto Mannermaa; Anne Kallioniemi; Geoffrey J Lindeman; Saundra S Buys; Irene L Andrulis; Paolo Radice; Carlo Tondini; Siranoush Manoukian; Amanda E Toland; Penelope Miron; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Susan M Domchek; Bruce Poppe; Kathleen B M Claes; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; Patrick Concannon; Jonine L Bernstein; Paul A James; Douglas F Easton; David E Goldgar; John L Hopper; Nazneen Rahman; Paolo Peterlongo; Heli Nevanlinna; Mary-Claire King; Fergus J Couch; Melissa C Southey; Robert Winqvist; William D Foulkes; Marc Tischkowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Janice L Berliner; Angela Musial Fay
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 2.717

9.  Recurrent mutations of BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 in the population of breast and ovarian cancer patients in Southern Poland.

Authors:  P Wojcik; M Jasiowka; E Strycharz; M Sobol; D Hodorowicz-Zaniewska; P Skotnicki; T Byrski; P Blecharz; E Marczyk; I Cedrych; J Jakubowicz; J Lubiński; V Sopik; S Narod; P Pierzchalski
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.857

10.  PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM rare variants and cancer risk: data from COGS.

Authors:  Melissa C Southey; David E Goldgar; Robert Winqvist; Katri Pylkäs; Fergus Couch; Marc Tischkowitz; William D Foulkes; Joe Dennis; Kyriaki Michailidou; Elizabeth J van Rensburg; Tuomas Heikkinen; Heli Nevanlinna; John L Hopper; Thilo Dörk; Kathleen Bm Claes; Jorge Reis-Filho; Zhi Ling Teo; Paolo Radice; Irene Catucci; Paolo Peterlongo; Helen Tsimiklis; Fabrice A Odefrey; James G Dowty; Marjanka K Schmidt; Annegien Broeks; Frans B Hogervorst; Senno Verhoef; Jane Carpenter; Christine Clarke; Rodney J Scott; Peter A Fasching; Lothar Haeberle; Arif B Ekici; Matthias W Beckmann; Julian Peto; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Olivia Fletcher; Nichola Johnson; Manjeet K Bolla; Elinor J Sawyer; Ian Tomlinson; Michael J Kerin; Nicola Miller; Federik Marme; Barbara Burwinkel; Rongxi Yang; Pascal Guénel; Thérèse Truong; Florence Menegaux; Marie Sanchez; Stig Bojesen; Sune F Nielsen; Henrik Flyger; Javier Benitez; M Pilar Zamora; Jose Ignacio Arias Perez; Primitiva Menéndez; Hoda Anton-Culver; Susan Neuhausen; Argyrios Ziogas; Christina A Clarke; Hermann Brenner; Volker Arndt; Christa Stegmaier; Hiltrud Brauch; Thomas Brüning; Yon-Dschun Ko; Taru A Muranen; Kristiina Aittomäki; Carl Blomqvist; Natalia V Bogdanova; Natalia N Antonenkova; Annika Lindblom; Sara Margolin; Arto Mannermaa; Vesa Kataja; Veli-Matti Kosma; Jaana M Hartikainen; Amanda B Spurdle; kConFab Investigators; Els Wauters; Dominiek Smeets; Benoit Beuselinck; Giuseppe Floris; Jenny Chang-Claude; Anja Rudolph; Petra Seibold; Dieter Flesch-Janys; Janet E Olson; Celine Vachon; Vernon S Pankratz; Catriona McLean; Christopher A Haiman; Brian E Henderson; Fredrick Schumacher; Loic Le Marchand; Vessela Kristensen; Grethe Grenaker Alnæs; Wei Zheng; David J Hunter; Sara Lindstrom; Susan E Hankinson; Peter Kraft; Irene Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Gord Glendon; Anna Marie Mulligan; Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen; Mervi Grip; Saila Kauppila; Peter Devilee; Robert A E M Tollenaar; Caroline Seynaeve; Antoinette Hollestelle; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Jonine Figueroa; Stephen J Chanock; Jolanta Lissowska; Kamila Czene; Hatef Darabi; Mikael Eriksson; Diana M Eccles; Sajjad Rafiq; William J Tapper; Sue M Gerty; Maartje J Hooning; John W M Martens; J Margriet Collée; Madeleine Tilanus-Linthorst; Per Hall; Jingmei Li; Judith S Brand; Keith Humphreys; Angela Cox; Malcolm W R Reed; Craig Luccarini; Caroline Baynes; Alison M Dunning; Ute Hamann; Diana Torres; Hans Ulrich Ulmer; Thomas Rüdiger; Anna Jakubowska; Jan Lubinski; Katarzyna Jaworska; Katarzyna Durda; Susan Slager; Amanda E Toland; Christine B Ambrosone; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; Anthony Swerdlow; Alan Ashworth; Nick Orr; Michael Jones; Anna González-Neira; Guillermo Pita; M Rosario Alonso; Nuria Álvarez; Daniel Herrero; Daniel C Tessier; Daniel Vincent; Francois Bacot; Jacques Simard; Martine Dumont; Penny Soucy; Rosalind Eeles; Kenneth Muir; Fredrik Wiklund; Henrik Gronberg; Johanna Schleutker; Børge G Nordestgaard; Maren Weischer; Ruth C Travis; David Neal; Jenny L Donovan; Freddie C Hamdy; Kay-Tee Khaw; Janet L Stanford; William J Blot; Stephen Thibodeau; Daniel J Schaid; Joseph L Kelley; Christiane Maier; Adam S Kibel; Cezary Cybulski; Lisa Cannon-Albright; Katja Butterbach; Jong Park; Radka Kaneva; Jyotsna Batra; Manuel R Teixeira; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Ali Amin Al Olama; Sara Benlloch; Stefan P Renner; Arndt Hartmann; Alexander Hein; Matthias Ruebner; Diether Lambrechts; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen; Ignace Vergote; Sandrina Lambretchs; Jennifer A Doherty; Mary Anne Rossing; Stefan Nickels; Ursula Eilber; Shan Wang-Gohrke; Kunle Odunsi; Lara E Sucheston-Campbell; Grace Friel; Galina Lurie; Jeffrey L Killeen; Lynne R Wilkens; Marc T Goodman; Ingo Runnebaum; Peter A Hillemanns; Liisa M Pelttari; Ralf Butzow; Francesmary Modugno; Robert P Edwards; Roberta B Ness; Kirsten B Moysich; Andreas du Bois; Florian Heitz; Philipp Harter; Stefan Kommoss; Beth Y Karlan; Christine Walsh; Jenny Lester; Allan Jensen; Susanne Krüger Kjaer; Estrid Høgdall; Bernard Peissel; Bernardo Bonanni; Loris Bernard; Ellen L Goode; Brooke L Fridley; Robert A Vierkant; Julie M Cunningham; Melissa C Larson; Zachary C Fogarty; Kimberly R Kalli; Dong Liang; Karen H Lu; Michelle A T Hildebrandt; Xifeng Wu; Douglas A Levine; Fanny Dao; Maria Bisogna; Andrew Berchuck; Edwin S Iversen; Jeffrey R Marks; Lucy Akushevich; Daniel W Cramer; Joellen Schildkraut; Kathryn L Terry; Elizabeth M Poole; Meir Stampfer; Shelley S Tworoger; Elisa V Bandera; Irene Orlow; Sara H Olson; Line Bjorge; Helga B Salvesen; Anne M van Altena; Katja K H Aben; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Leon F A G Massuger; Tanja Pejovic; Yukie Bean; Angela Brooks-Wilson; Linda E Kelemen; Linda S Cook; Nhu D Le; Bohdan Górski; Jacek Gronwald; Janusz Menkiszak; Claus K Høgdall; Lene Lundvall; Lotte Nedergaard; Svend Aage Engelholm; Ed Dicks; Jonathan Tyrer; Ian Campbell; Iain McNeish; James Paul; Nadeem Siddiqui; Rosalind Glasspool; Alice S Whittemore; Joseph H Rothstein; Valerie McGuire; Weiva Sieh; Hui Cai; Xiao-Ou Shu; Rachel T Teten; Rebecca Sutphen; John R McLaughlin; Steven A Narod; Catherine M Phelan; Alvaro N Monteiro; David Fenstermacher; Hui-Yi Lin; Jennifer B Permuth; Thomas A Sellers; Y Ann Chen; Ya-Yu Tsai; Zhihua Chen; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Simon A Gayther; Susan J Ramus; Usha Menon; Anna H Wu; Celeste L Pearce; David Van Den Berg; Malcolm C Pike; Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska; Joanna Plisiecka-Halasa; Joanna Moes-Sosnowska; Jolanta Kupryjanczyk; Paul Dp Pharoah; Honglin Song; Ingrid Winship; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Graham G Giles; Sean V Tavtigian; Doug F Easton; Roger L Milne
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 6.318

View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical Significance of Gene Mutations and Polymorphic Variants and their Association with Prostate Cancer Risk in Polish Men.

Authors:  Marta Heise; Piotr Jarzemski; Dagmara Nowak; Aneta Bąk; Anna Junkiert-Czarnecka; Maria Pilarska-Deltow; Maciej Borysiak; Beata Pilarska; Olga Haus
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

2.  Emerging roles for clinical pharmacometrics in cancer precision medicine.

Authors:  Sujit Nair; Ah-Ng Tony Kong
Journal:  Curr Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2018-04-20

3.  Genetic testing in Poland and Ukraine: should comprehensive germline testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 be recommended for women with breast and ovarian cancer?

Authors:  Tu Nguyen-Dumont; Pawel Karpinski; Maria M Sasiadek; Hayane Akopyan; Jason A Steen; Derrick Theys; Fleur Hammet; Helen Tsimiklis; Daniel J Park; Bernard J Pope; Ryszard Slezak; Agnieszka Stembalska; Karolina Pesz; Nataliya Kitsera; Aleksandra Siekierzynska; Melissa C Southey; Aleksander Myszka
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 1.588

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.