Literature DB >> 29052082

Waiting for surgery: is waiting bad for anyone or everyone?

J M Sutherland1, G Liu2, R T Crump3, A A Karimuddin4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: For Canadians, as in many countries, waiting for elective surgery is expected. The duration of the wait raises questions about the maximum amount of time patients should wait for their surgery. The primary objective of this study was to test for a relationship between the length of time patients waited for elective hernia repair surgery and change in patients' self-reported health.
METHODS: This study was based on a prospectively recruited longitudinal cohort of patients waiting for elective hernia repair surgery. Participants completed the PHQ-9, PEG, EQ-5D(3L) generic instruments, and the condition-specific COMI-hernia. Multivariate regression models explored associations between patient-reported outcomes and potential confounders, including age, sex, socio-economic status, and medical comorbidities.
RESULTS: There were 118 participants and the modal age group was 61-70 years. The average wait time for participants was 22.5 weeks. There were no relationships between the duration of participants' wait for hernia repair and the change in patients' self-reported health for hernia-specific outcomes or overall health-related quality of life. DISCUSSION: There are gains in health-related quality of life to be realized by prioritizing symptomatic patients. Participants with greater pre-operative depression, pain, and hernia-related symptoms experienced an improvement in health prior to surgery, though more clarity is needed on the mechanisms that led to improved health.
CONCLUSION: Many countries face problems with wait lists for elective surgery-and few have effective processes for triaging patients. This study shows that duration of time on the wait list was not associated with change in hernia patients' self-reported health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elective surgery; Hernia; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life; Wait list

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29052082     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1684-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  20 in total

Review 1.  Clinical inquiries. What is the risk of bowel strangulation in an adult with an untreated inguinal hernia?

Authors:  Kristel D Leubner; William M Chop; Bernard Ewigman; Bridget Loven; Michael K Park
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Patient-reported outcomes and surgical triage: A gap in patient-centered care?

Authors:  R Trafford Crump; Guiping Liu; Mark Chase; Jason M Sutherland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Simple questionnaire for assessing core outcomes in inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  R F Staerkle; P Villiger
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire.

Authors:  R L Spitzer; K Kroenke; J B Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Unintended consequences of policy change to watchful waiting for asymptomatic inguinal hernias.

Authors:  M J Hwang; A Bhangu; C E Webster; D M Bowley; M X Gannon; S S Karandikar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Does delaying repair of an asymptomatic hernia have a penalty?

Authors:  Jon S Thompson; James O Gibbs; Domenic J Reda; Martin McCarthy; Yongliang Wei; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Robert J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  The development of a clinical trial to determine if watchful waiting is an acceptable alternative to routine herniorrhaphy for patients with minimal or no hernia symptoms.

Authors:  Robert J Fitzgibbons; Olga Jonasson; James Gibbs; Dorothy D Dunlop; William Henderson; Domenic Reda; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Martin McCarthy
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Fatigue and pain: relationships with physical performance and patient beliefs after stroke.

Authors:  Kristine K Miller; Stephanie A Combs; Marieke Van Puymbroeck; Peter A Altenburger; Jacob Kean; Tracy A Dierks; Arlene A Schmid
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.119

10.  Development and initial validation of the PEG, a three-item scale assessing pain intensity and interference.

Authors:  Erin E Krebs; Karl A Lorenz; Matthew J Bair; Teresa M Damush; Jingwei Wu; Jason M Sutherland; Steven M Asch; Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Longitudinal Analysis of Wait Times for Bariatric Surgery in a Publicly Funded, Regionalized Bariatric Care System.

Authors:  Aristithes G Doumouras; Samantha Albacete; Aneetinder Mann; Scott Gmora; Mehran Anvari; Dennis Hong
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Prioritization criteria of patients on scheduled waiting lists for abdominal wall hernia surgery: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  M López-Cano; V Rodrigues-Gonçalves; M Verdaguer-Tremolosa; C Petrola-Chacón; D Rosselló-Jiménez; J Saludes-Serra; M Armengol-Carrasco; J M Garcia-Alamino
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.739

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.