Kevin S Heffernan1, Wesley K Lefferts2, Eun Sun Yoon3, Soo Hyun Park3, Yong Hee Lee3, Sae Young Jae3. 1. Department of Exercise Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA. ksheffer@syr.edu. 2. Department of Exercise Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA. 3. Department of Sport Science, University of Seoul, Seoul, 130-743, South Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Acute resistance exercise has been shown to reduce brachial endothelial function. Whether there are concomitant reductions in carotid endothelial function remains unexplored. METHODS: Cold pressor test-mediated vasodilation of the carotid artery was used to assess carotid endothelial function in 15 young and healthy participants (age 26 ± 1 years, body mass index 24 ± 1 kg/m2) after acute resistance exercise or an inactive time control condition. RESULTS: Acute resistance exercise had no effect on the cold pressor test-mediated vasodilation compared to time control (5.8 ± 0.8 vs 6.2 ± 0.9% dilation, p > 0.05). INTERPRETATION: Carotid endothelial function may not be compromised following acute resistance exercise in young healthy adults.
OBJECTIVE: Acute resistance exercise has been shown to reduce brachial endothelial function. Whether there are concomitant reductions in carotid endothelial function remains unexplored. METHODS: Cold pressor test-mediated vasodilation of the carotid artery was used to assess carotid endothelial function in 15 young and healthy participants (age 26 ± 1 years, body mass index 24 ± 1 kg/m2) after acute resistance exercise or an inactive time control condition. RESULTS: Acute resistance exercise had no effect on the cold pressor test-mediated vasodilation compared to time control (5.8 ± 0.8 vs 6.2 ± 0.9% dilation, p > 0.05). INTERPRETATION: Carotid endothelial function may not be compromised following acute resistance exercise in young healthy adults.
Entities:
Keywords:
Blood pressure; Carotid artery; Resistance exercise; Vascular function
Authors: Jason W Jurva; Shane A Phillips; Amjad Q Syed; Amina Y Syed; Susan Pitt; Andrea Weaver; David D Gutterman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-07-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Allison E DeVan; Maria M Anton; Jill N Cook; Daria B Neidre; Miriam Y Cortez-Cooper; Hirofumi Tanaka Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2005-02-17
Authors: Anke C C M van Mil; Yvonne Hartman; Frederieke van Oorschot; Annemieke Heemels; Nikki Bax; Ellen A Dawson; Nicola Hopkins; Maria T E Hopman; Daniel J Green; David L Oxborough; Dick H J Thijssen Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Eun Sun Yoon; Su Jin Jung; Sung Kun Cheun; Yoo Sung Oh; Seol Hyang Kim; Sae Young Jae Journal: Korean Circ J Date: 2010-01-27 Impact factor: 3.243
Authors: Yan Tan; Pi-Ou Tseng; Daren Wang; Hui Zhang; Kendall Hunter; Jean Hertzberg; Kurt R Stenmark; Wei Tan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Wesley K Lefferts; Elizabeth C Lefferts; Brooks A Hibner; Kurt J Smith; Bo Fernhall Journal: Exp Physiol Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 2.969