Literature DB >> 29052033

A random-perturbation therapy in chronic non-specific low-back pain patients: a randomised controlled trial.

Adamantios Arampatzis1,2, Arno Schroll3,4, Maria Moreno Catalá3,4, Gunnar Laube3,4, Sabine Schüler5, Karsten Dreinhofer5,6.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to assess the effectiveness of a specific rehabilitation therapy for chronic non-specific low-back pain patients, based on a random/irregular functional perturbation training induced by force disturbances to the spine. Forty patients (20 controls and 20 in the perturbation-based group) finished the whole experimental design. A random-perturbation exercise, which included variable and unpredictable disturbances, was implemented in the therapy of the perturbation-based group (13 weeks, two times per week and 1.5 h per session). The participants of the control group did not receive any specific training. Low-back pain, muscle strength, and neuromuscular control of spine stability were investigated before and after the therapy using the visual analog scale, maximal isometric and isokinetic contractions, nonlinear time series analysis, and by determining the stiffness and damping of the trunk after sudden perturbations. The perturbation-based therapy reduced patient's low-back pain (35%), increased muscle strength (15-22%), and trunk stiffness (13%), while no significant changes were observed in the control group. It can be concluded that the proposed therapy has the potential to enhance trunk muscle capability as well as sensory information processing within the motor system during sudden loading and, as a consequence, improve the stabilization of the trunk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MiSpEx; Neuromuscular control; Noise-based therapy; Nonlinear time series analysis; Quick release; Trunk muscle strength

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29052033     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-017-3742-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  43 in total

1.  Damping actions of the neuromuscular system with inertial loads: human flexor pollicis longus muscle.

Authors:  D C Lin; W Z Rymer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Noise-induced entrainment and stochastic resonance in human brain waves.

Authors:  Toshio Mori; Shoichi Kai
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-05-10       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Barrages of synaptic activity control the gain and sensitivity of cortical neurons.

Authors:  Yousheng Shu; Andrea Hasenstaub; Mathilde Badoual; Thierry Bal; David A McCormick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  The benefits of noise in neural systems: bridging theory and experiment.

Authors:  Mark D McDonnell; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Precision control of trunk movement in low back pain patients.

Authors:  Nienke W Willigenburg; Idsart Kingma; Marco J M Hoozemans; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Noise-enhanced vibrotactile sensitivity in older adults, patients with stroke, and patients with diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Wen Liu; Lewis A Lipsitz; Manuel Montero-Odasso; Jonathan Bean; D Casey Kerrigan; James J Collins
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Comparing the local dynamic stability of trunk movements between varsity athletes with and without non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Ryan B Graham; Lisa Y Oikawa; Gwyneth B Ross
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Corticomotor excitability of back muscles is affected by intervertebral disc lesion in pigs.

Authors:  Paul W Hodges; Mary P Galea; Sten Holm; Allison Kaigle Holm
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  The effects of stochastic resonance stimulation on spine proprioception and postural control in chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  N Peter Reeves; Jacek Cholewicki; Angela S Lee; Lawrence W Mysliwiec
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The intrinsic stiffness of the in vivo lumbar spine in response to quick releases: implications for reflexive requirements.

Authors:  Stephen H M Brown; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.368

View more
  10 in total

1.  Spinal movement variability associated with low back pain: A scoping review.

Authors:  Hiroki Saito; Yoshiteru Watanabe; Toshiki Kutsuna; Toshihiro Futohashi; Yasuaki Kusumoto; Hiroki Chiba; Masayoshi Kubo; Hiroshi Takasaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Jenna Ellis; Rachel Ogilvie; Antti Malmivaara; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-28

3.  Dose-response-relationship of stabilisation exercises in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-regression.

Authors:  Juliane Mueller; Daniel Niederer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Understanding the impact of lumbar disc degeneration and chronic low back pain: A cross-sectional electromyographic analysis of postural strategy during predicted and unpredicted postural perturbations.

Authors:  Janet A Deane; Adrian K P Lim; Alison H McGregor; Paul H Strutton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of Six-Week Resistance and Sensorimotor Training on Trunk Strength and Stability in Elite Adolescent Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Steffen Mueller; Juliane Mueller; Josefine Stoll; Frank Mayer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Symptomatic individuals with Lumbar Disc Degeneration use different anticipatory and compensatory kinematic strategies to asymptomatic controls in response to postural perturbation.

Authors:  Janet A Deane; Adrian K P Lim; Andrew T M Phillips; Alison H McGregor
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 2.746

7.  Dose-response relationship of core-specific sensorimotor interventions in healthy, well-trained participants: study protocol for a (MiSpEx) randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Juliane Mueller; Josefine Stoll; Steffen Mueller; Frank Mayer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Muscle Strength and Neuromuscular Control in Low-Back Pain: Elite Athletes Versus General Population.

Authors:  María Moreno Catalá; Arno Schroll; Gunnar Laube; Adamantios Arampatzis
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  The Feasibility and Effectiveness of a New Practical Multidisciplinary Treatment for Low-Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Pia-Maria Wippert; David Drießlein; Heidrun Beck; Christian Schneider; Anne-Katrin Puschmann; Winfried Banzer; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Which specific modes of exercise training are most effective for treating low back pain? Network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Niamh L Mundell; Simone J J M Verswijveren; Scott D Tagliaferri; Helena Brisby; Steven J Bowe; Daniel L Belavy
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 13.800

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.