Literature DB >> 29051316

Profile of pig farms combining high performance and low antimicrobial usage within four European countries.

Lucie Collineau1,2, Annette Backhans3, Jeroen Dewulf4, Ulf Emanuelson3, Elisabeth Grosse Beilage5, Anne Lehébel6, Svenja Loesken5, Elisabeth Okholm Nielsen7, Merel Postma4, Marie Sjölund3,8, Katharina D C Stärk1,9, Catherine Belloc6.   

Abstract

Pig farmers are strongly encouraged to reduce their antimicrobial usage because of the rising threat from antimicrobial resistance. However, such efforts should not compromise the herd health status and performance. This study aimed to describe the profile of so-called 'top-farms' that managed to combine both high technical performance and low antimicrobial usage. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 227 farrow-to-finish farms in Belgium, France, Germany and Sweden. Among them, 44 farms were allocated to the top-farms group and were compared with the 'regular' farms group in terms of farm characteristics, biosecurity and health status. Top-farms had fewer gastrointestinal symptoms in suckling pigs and fewer respiratory symptoms in fatteners, which could partly explain their reduced need for antimicrobials and higher performance. They also had higher biosecurity and were located in sparsely populated pig areas. However, 14 farms of the top-farms group were located in densely populated pig areas, but still managed to have low usage and high technical performance; they had higher internal biosecurity and more extensive vaccination against respiratory pathogens. These results illustrate that it is possible to control infectious diseases using other approaches than high antimicrobial usage, even in farms with challenging environmental and health conditions. © British Veterinary Association (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibiotics; biosecurity; health management

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29051316     DOI: 10.1136/vr.103988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Rec        ISSN: 0042-4900            Impact factor:   2.695


  7 in total

1.  Reduction in antimicrobial resistance by the way of extensive vaccination.

Authors:  Sachin Kumar
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Invited review: strategic adoption of antibiotic-free pork production: the importance of a holistic approach.

Authors:  John F Patience; Alejandro Ramirez
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  Association between antimicrobial usage, biosecurity measures as well as farm performance in German farrow-to-finish farms.

Authors:  S Raasch; M Postma; J Dewulf; K D C Stärk; E Grosse Beilage
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2018-12-14

4.  Biosecurity practices in Belgian veal calf farming: Level of implementation, attitudes, strengths, weaknesses and constraints.

Authors:  Bert Damiaans; Véronique Renault; Steven Sarrazin; Anna Catharina Berge; Bart Pardon; Stefaan Ribbens; Claude Saegerman; Jeroen Dewulf
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 2.670

5.  Antimicrobial Usage Among Different Age Categories and Herd Sizes in Swiss Farrow-to-Finish Farms.

Authors:  Thomas Echtermann; Cedric Muentener; Xaver Sidler; Dolf Kuemmerlen
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-12-15

6.  National Monitoring of Veterinary-Dispensed Antimicrobials for Use on Pig Farms in Austria: 2015-2020.

Authors:  Clair L Firth; Reinhard Fuchs; Klemens Fuchs
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-08

7.  No Change in Risk for Antibiotic-Resistant Salmonellosis from Beef, United States, 2002-2010.

Authors:  Solenne Costard; Jane G Pouzou; Keith E Belk; Paul S Morley; John W Schmidt; Tommy L Wheeler; Terrance M Arthur; Francisco J Zagmutt
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 6.883

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.