Literature DB >> 29050393

Distinct processing of ambiguous speech in people with non-clinical auditory verbal hallucinations.

Ben Alderson-Day1, César F Lima2,3, Samuel Evans2,4, Saloni Krishnan2,5, Pradheep Shanmugalingam2, Charles Fernyhough1, Sophie K Scott2.   

Abstract

Auditory verbal hallucinations (hearing voices) are typically associated with psychosis, but a minority of the general population also experience them frequently and without distress. Such 'non-clinical' experiences offer a rare and unique opportunity to study hallucinations apart from confounding clinical factors, thus allowing for the identification of symptom-specific mechanisms. Recent theories propose that hallucinations result from an imbalance of prior expectation and sensory information, but whether such an imbalance also influences auditory-perceptual processes remains unknown. We examine for the first time the cortical processing of ambiguous speech in people without psychosis who regularly hear voices. Twelve non-clinical voice-hearers and 17 matched controls completed a functional magnetic resonance imaging scan while passively listening to degraded speech ('sine-wave' speech), that was either potentially intelligible or unintelligible. Voice-hearers reported recognizing the presence of speech in the stimuli before controls, and before being explicitly informed of its intelligibility. Across both groups, intelligible sine-wave speech engaged a typical left-lateralized speech processing network. Notably, however, voice-hearers showed stronger intelligibility responses than controls in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and in the superior frontal gyrus. This suggests an enhanced involvement of attention and sensorimotor processes, selectively when speech was potentially intelligible. Altogether, these behavioural and neural findings indicate that people with hallucinatory experiences show distinct responses to meaningful auditory stimuli. A greater weighting towards prior knowledge and expectation might cause non-veridical auditory sensations in these individuals, but it might also spontaneously facilitate perceptual processing where such knowledge is required. This has implications for the understanding of hallucinations in clinical and non-clinical populations, and is consistent with current 'predictive processing' theories of psychosis.
© The Author (2017). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory system; hallucination; imaging; psychosis; schizophrenia

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29050393     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awx206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  26 in total

Review 1.  Hallucinations and Strong Priors.

Authors:  Philip R Corlett; Guillermo Horga; Paul C Fletcher; Ben Alderson-Day; Katharina Schmack; Albert R Powers
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Delusion Proneness is Linked to a Reduced Usage of Prior Beliefs in Perceptual Decisions.

Authors:  Heiner Stuke; Veith Andreas Weilnhammer; Philipp Sterzer; Katharina Schmack
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Continuities and Discontinuities in the Cognitive Mechanisms Associated With Clinical and Nonclinical Auditory Verbal Hallucinations.

Authors:  Peter Moseley; Ben Alderson-Day; Stephanie Common; Guy Dodgson; Rebecca Lee; Kaja Mitrenga; Jamie Moffatt; Charles Fernyhough
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-01-17

4.  Perceptual pathways to hallucinogenesis.

Authors:  Andrew D Sheldon; Eren Kafadar; Victoria Fisher; Maximillian S Greenwald; Fraser Aitken; Alyson M Negreira; Scott W Woods; Albert R Powers
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.662

5.  Psychotic Experiences in Schizophrenia and Sensitivity to Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Veith Weilnhammer; Lukas Röd; Anna-Lena Eckert; Heiner Stuke; Andreas Heinz; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Neural Prediction Errors Distinguish Perception and Misperception of Speech.

Authors:  Helen Blank; Marlene Spangenberg; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Reconciling competing mechanisms posited to underlie auditory verbal hallucinations.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Daniel H Mathalon; Judith M Ford
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Increased face detection responses on the mooney faces test in people at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Albert R Powers; Philip R Corlett; Steven M Silverstein; Judy L Thompson; James M Gold; Jason Schiffman; James A Waltz; Trevor F Williams; Richard E Zinbarg; Vijay A Mittal; Lauren M Ellman; Gregory P Strauss; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Jason A Levin; Eren Kafadar; Joshua Kenney; Dillon Smith
Journal:  NPJ Schizophr       Date:  2021-05-17

9.  Computerized Assessment of Psychosis Risk.

Authors:  Vijay A Mittal; Lauren M Ellman; Gregory P Strauss; Elaine F Walker; Philip R Corlett; Jason Schiffman; Scott W Woods; Albert R Powers; Steven M Silverstein; James A Waltz; Richard Zinbarg; Shuo Chen; Trevor Williams; Joshua Kenney; James M Gold
Journal:  J Psychiatr Brain Sci       Date:  2021-06-29

10.  Musical hallucinations, musical imagery, and earworms: A new phenomenological survey.

Authors:  Peter Moseley; Ben Alderson-Day; Sukhbinder Kumar; Charles Fernyhough
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2018-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.