Literature DB >> 29048979

Comparison of Single-Port Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Repair and Three-Port Mini-Laparoscopic Repair for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia.

Mevlit Korkmaz1, B Haluk Güvenç2.   

Abstract

AIM: Laparoscopy has been widely used in surgical practice in pediatric age, and many techniques for laparoscopic hernia repair have been described till now. In this study, we compared two laparoscopic techniques performed by two surgeons; each surgeon practicing only one of the two techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the surgical charts, enrolling 71 patients with uncomplicated inguinal hernia. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of surgery: (Group A, 24 patients aged 2 months-8 years) laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing technique and (Group B, 47 patients aged 35 days-12 years) three-port mini-laparoscopic technique. The hernia sac was ligated at the level of internal ring, using nonabsorbable 4/0-3/0 suture. Any unexpected contralateral opening was repaired in the same manner for both groups. Follow-up period was 4 months-2 years and 9 months-8 years, respectively. Operative time and complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: Operation time (19.58 ± 7.06 minutes versus 35.87 ± 10.34 minutes, P < .001) was shorter in the percutaneous repair group. However, when subdivided by unilateral and bilateral presentation, only unilateral operative time was shorter compared to three-port group. There were no recurrences in Group A, while two recurrences occurred in Group B during the learning curve period. A contralateral opening accompanied the presenting unilateral hernia in 3 cases for Group A and 16 for Group B. One patient had to be converted open resulting from epigastric vessel injury, and postop hydrocele formation was seen in another in Group A. No intraoperative complications were seen in Group B.
CONCLUSION: The overall experience shows that laparoscopic repair is a reliable approach regardless of the chosen technique. Percutaneous repair seems to be a less invasive method with shorter operative time, but it is not free of complications according to this series.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inguinal hernia; laparoscopy; repair

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29048979     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  6 in total

1.  Application of a novel material in the inguinal region using a totally percutaneous approach in an animal model: a new potential technique?

Authors:  M E Giménez; C F Davrieux; E Serra; M Palermo; E J Houghton; G Alonci; E Piantanida; A Garcia Vazquez; V Lindner; B Dallemagne; M Diana; J Marescaux; L De Cola
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing for Indirect Inguinal Hernia in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Hye Kyung Chang
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2020-06-15

3.  Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernias repair in girls: using an epidural needle assisted by a towel forceps.

Authors:  Yuanhong Xiao
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Laparoscopic surgery: an effective and safe surgical method of pediatric inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Eun Jung Kim; Chaeyoun Oh; Jun Won Um
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2021-12-15

5.  Comparison of laparoscope-assisted single-needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure versus open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Shaofeng Wu; Xiaoyu Xing; Rong He; Haiteng Zhao; Liang Zhong; Jie Sun
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 2.030

6.  Pediatric inguinal hernia treated by single-port laparoscopic water injection hernia crochet needle.

Authors:  Jian Zhou; Xinxin Chen; Tong Jiang
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 1.195

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.