Abhijit Chakraborty1, Ferhat Ay1,2. 1. Division of Vaccine Discovery, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, CA, USA. 2. School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Eukaryotic chromosomes adapt a complex and highly dynamic three-dimensional (3D) structure, which profoundly affects different cellular functions and outcomes including changes in epigenetic landscape and in gene expression. Making the scenario even more complex, cancer cells harbor chromosomal abnormalities [e.g. copy number variations (CNVs) and translocations] altering their genomes both at the sequence level and at the level of 3D organization. High-throughput chromosome conformation capture techniques (e.g. Hi-C), which are originally developed for decoding the 3D structure of the chromatin, provide a great opportunity to simultaneously identify the locations of genomic rearrangements and to investigate the 3D genome organization in cancer cells. Even though Hi-C data has been used for validating known rearrangements, computational methods that can distinguish rearrangement signals from the inherent biases of Hi-C data and from the actual 3D conformation of chromatin, and can precisely detect rearrangement locations de novo have been missing. RESULTS: In this work, we characterize how intra and inter-chromosomal Hi-C contacts are distributed for normal and rearranged chromosomes to devise a new set of algorithms (i) to identify genomic segments that correspond to CNV regions such as amplifications and deletions (HiCnv), (ii) to call inter-chromosomal translocations and their boundaries (HiCtrans) from Hi-C experiments and (iii) to simulate Hi-C data from genomes with desired rearrangements and abnormalities (AveSim) in order to select optimal parameters for and to benchmark the accuracy of our methods. Our results on 10 different cancer cell lines with Hi-C data show that we identify a total number of 105 amplifications and 45 deletions together with 90 translocations, whereas we identify virtually no such events for two karyotypically normal cell lines. Our CNV predictions correlate very well with whole genome sequencing data among chromosomes with CNV events for a breast cancer cell line (r = 0.89) and capture most of the CNVs we simulate using Avesim. For HiCtrans predictions, we report evidence from the literature for 30 out of 90 translocations for eight of our cancer cell lines. Furthermore, we show that our tools identify and correctly classify relatively understudied rearrangements such as double minutes and homogeneously staining regions. Considering the inherent limitations of existing techniques for karyotyping (i.e. missing balanced rearrangements and those near repetitive regions), the accurate identification of CNVs and translocations in a cost-effective and high-throughput setting is still a challenge. Our results show that the set of tools we develop effectively utilize moderately sequenced Hi-C libraries (100-300 million reads) to identify known and de novo chromosomal rearrangements/abnormalities in well-established cancer cell lines. With the decrease in required number of cells and the increase in attainable resolution, we believe that our framework will pave the way towards comprehensive mapping of genomic rearrangements in primary cells from cancer patients using Hi-C. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: CNV calling: https://github.com/ay-lab/HiCnv, Translocation calling: https://github.com/ay-lab/HiCtrans and Hi-C simulation: https://github.com/ay-lab/AveSim. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: Eukaryotic chromosomes adapt a complex and highly dynamic three-dimensional (3D) structure, which profoundly affects different cellular functions and outcomes including changes in epigenetic landscape and in gene expression. Making the scenario even more complex, cancer cells harbor chromosomal abnormalities [e.g. copy number variations (CNVs) and translocations] altering their genomes both at the sequence level and at the level of 3D organization. High-throughput chromosome conformation capture techniques (e.g. Hi-C), which are originally developed for decoding the 3D structure of the chromatin, provide a great opportunity to simultaneously identify the locations of genomic rearrangements and to investigate the 3D genome organization in cancer cells. Even though Hi-C data has been used for validating known rearrangements, computational methods that can distinguish rearrangement signals from the inherent biases of Hi-C data and from the actual 3D conformation of chromatin, and can precisely detect rearrangement locations de novo have been missing. RESULTS: In this work, we characterize how intra and inter-chromosomal Hi-C contacts are distributed for normal and rearranged chromosomes to devise a new set of algorithms (i) to identify genomic segments that correspond to CNV regions such as amplifications and deletions (HiCnv), (ii) to call inter-chromosomal translocations and their boundaries (HiCtrans) from Hi-C experiments and (iii) to simulate Hi-C data from genomes with desired rearrangements and abnormalities (AveSim) in order to select optimal parameters for and to benchmark the accuracy of our methods. Our results on 10 different cancer cell lines with Hi-C data show that we identify a total number of 105 amplifications and 45 deletions together with 90 translocations, whereas we identify virtually no such events for two karyotypically normal cell lines. Our CNV predictions correlate very well with whole genome sequencing data among chromosomes with CNV events for a breast cancer cell line (r = 0.89) and capture most of the CNVs we simulate using Avesim. For HiCtrans predictions, we report evidence from the literature for 30 out of 90 translocations for eight of our cancer cell lines. Furthermore, we show that our tools identify and correctly classify relatively understudied rearrangements such as double minutes and homogeneously staining regions. Considering the inherent limitations of existing techniques for karyotyping (i.e. missing balanced rearrangements and those near repetitive regions), the accurate identification of CNVs and translocations in a cost-effective and high-throughput setting is still a challenge. Our results show that the set of tools we develop effectively utilize moderately sequenced Hi-C libraries (100-300 million reads) to identify known and de novo chromosomal rearrangements/abnormalities in well-established cancer cell lines. With the decrease in required number of cells and the increase in attainable resolution, we believe that our framework will pave the way towards comprehensive mapping of genomic rearrangements in primary cells from cancerpatients using Hi-C. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: CNV calling: https://github.com/ay-lab/HiCnv, Translocation calling: https://github.com/ay-lab/HiCtrans and Hi-C simulation: https://github.com/ay-lab/AveSim. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Darío G Lupiáñez; Katerina Kraft; Verena Heinrich; Peter Krawitz; Francesco Brancati; Eva Klopocki; Denise Horn; Hülya Kayserili; John M Opitz; Renata Laxova; Fernando Santos-Simarro; Brigitte Gilbert-Dussardier; Lars Wittler; Marina Borschiwer; Stefan A Haas; Marco Osterwalder; Martin Franke; Bernd Timmermann; Jochen Hecht; Malte Spielmann; Axel Visel; Stefan Mundlos Journal: Cell Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Erez Lieberman-Aiden; Nynke L van Berkum; Louise Williams; Maxim Imakaev; Tobias Ragoczy; Agnes Telling; Ido Amit; Bryan R Lajoie; Peter J Sabo; Michael O Dorschner; Richard Sandstrom; Bradley Bernstein; M A Bender; Mark Groudine; Andreas Gnirke; John Stamatoyannopoulos; Leonid A Mirny; Eric S Lander; Job Dekker Journal: Science Date: 2009-10-09 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: J M Davidson; K L Gorringe; S F Chin; B Orsetti; C Besret; C Courtay-Cahen; I Roberts; C Theillet; C Caldas; P A Edwards Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Ferhat Ay; Evelien M Bunnik; Nelle Varoquaux; Sebastiaan M Bol; Jacques Prudhomme; Jean-Philippe Vert; William Stafford Noble; Karine G Le Roch Journal: Genome Res Date: 2014-03-26 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Benjamin D Pope; Tyrone Ryba; Vishnu Dileep; Feng Yue; Weisheng Wu; Olgert Denas; Daniel L Vera; Yanli Wang; R Scott Hansen; Theresa K Canfield; Robert E Thurman; Yong Cheng; Günhan Gülsoy; Jonathan H Dennis; Michael P Snyder; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; James Taylor; Ross C Hardison; Tamer Kahveci; Bing Ren; David M Gilbert Journal: Nature Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Uirá Souto Melo; Robert Schöpflin; Rocio Acuna-Hidalgo; Martin Atta Mensah; Björn Fischer-Zirnsak; Manuel Holtgrewe; Marius-Konstantin Klever; Seval Türkmen; Verena Heinrich; Ilina Datkhaeva Pluym; Eunice Matoso; Sérgio Bernardo de Sousa; Pedro Louro; Wiebke Hülsemann; Monika Cohen; Andreas Dufke; Anna Latos-Bieleńska; Martin Vingron; Vera Kalscheuer; Fabiola Quintero-Rivera; Malte Spielmann; Stefan Mundlos Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Mikhail G Dozmorov; Katarzyna M Tyc; Nathan C Sheffield; David C Boyd; Amy L Olex; Jason Reed; J Chuck Harrell Journal: Gigascience Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 6.524
Authors: Jesse R Dixon; Jie Xu; Vishnu Dileep; Ye Zhan; Fan Song; Victoria T Le; Galip Gürkan Yardımcı; Abhijit Chakraborty; Darrin V Bann; Yanli Wang; Royden Clark; Lijun Zhang; Hongbo Yang; Tingting Liu; Sriranga Iyyanki; Lin An; Christopher Pool; Takayo Sasaki; Juan Carlos Rivera-Mulia; Hakan Ozadam; Bryan R Lajoie; Rajinder Kaul; Michael Buckley; Kristen Lee; Morgan Diegel; Dubravka Pezic; Christina Ernst; Suzana Hadjur; Duncan T Odom; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; James R Broach; Ross C Hardison; Ferhat Ay; William Stafford Noble; Job Dekker; David M Gilbert; Feng Yue Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Mark Pieterse; Joost Swennenhuis; G Tjitske Los-de Vries; Amin Allahyar; Mehmet Yilmaz; Roos Leguit; Ruud W J Meijers; Robert van der Geize; Joost Vermaat; Arjen Cleven; Tom van Wezel; Arjan Diepstra; Léon C van Kempen; Nathalie J Hijmering; Phylicia Stathi; Milan Sharma; Adrien S J Melquiond; Paula J P de Vree; Marjon J A M Verstegen; Peter H L Krijger; Karima Hajo; Marieke Simonis; Agata Rakszewska; Max van Min; Daphne de Jong; Bauke Ylstra; Harma Feitsma; Erik Splinter; Wouter de Laat Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 14.919