Literature DB >> 29047005

Identification of valve-related artifact during cardiac mapping.

Krishna Kancharla1,2, Thomas M Munger1, Rick A Nishimura1, Abhishek Deshmukh1, Douglas L Packer1, Samuel J Asirvatham1,3, Suraj Kapa4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: During cardiac mapping, it is critical to discriminate signals related to cardiac conduction versus those due to mechanical interaction with other cardiac structures such as valves. We sought to define characteristics that could facilitate discrimination of valve artifact from cardiac conduction signals.
METHODS: Patients with structurally normal heart undergoing mapping for ventricular arrhythmias arising from the vicinity of the aortic valve between January 2013 and May 2015 were included. Potentials felt to reflect aortic valve opening (occurring at the end of the QRS after the local ventricular signal) were termed A1, and those felt to reflect valve closure were termed A2.
RESULTS: A total of 24 patients had mapping in the sinuses of Valsalva, and 10 (average age 40 + 15, 60% male) were found to have additional signals (A1 and/or A2) notable during mapping. In all patients, intervals between A1 and A2 shortened after ectopic beats and lengthened after compensatory pauses. These variations in the interval matched the change in systolic duration on Doppler echocardiography. Overdrive atrial pacing was performed in four patients, which demonstrated progressive shortening of intervals between A1 and A2. Pacing always revealed local capture without affecting A1 or A2. In the one patient in whom ablation was performed in these areas, there was no effect on A1 or A2, suggesting these signals represented artifact.
CONCLUSIONS: Valve-related signals in the aortic sinuses are commonly seen and can be distinguished. The interval between A1 and A2 correlated with mechanical systole and varied in a physiologically predictable manner with heart rate changes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ablation; Artifact; Cardiac mapping; Valve

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29047005     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-017-0293-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  4 in total

Review 1.  Signals and signal processing for the electrophysiologist: part I: electrogram acquisition.

Authors:  K L Venkatachalam; Joel E Herbrandson; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-12

2.  Characterization of Aortic Valve Closure Artifact During Outflow Tract Mapping: Correlation With Hemodynamics and Mechanical Valves.

Authors:  Jorge Romero; Olujimi Ajijola; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Roderick Tung
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-06

3.  Teaching points with 3-dimensional mapping of cardiac arrhythmias: taking points: activation mapping.

Authors:  Freddy Del Carpio Munoz; Traci Buescher; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-06

4.  Mechanisms and utility of discrete great arterial potentials in the ablation of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Komandoor S Srivathsan; T Jared Bunch; Samuel J Asirvatham; William D Edwards; Paul A Friedman; Thomas M Munger; Stephen C Hammill; Yong-Mei Cha; Peter A Brady; Arshad Jahangir; David J Bradley; Robert F Rea; Douglas L Packer; Win-Kuang Shen
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.