Literature DB >> 29046429

Paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation increases maximal voluntary activation of human adductor pollicis.

Jessica M D'Amico1, Siobhan C Dongés1,2, Janet L Taylor1,2,3.   

Abstract

Paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS), which delivers repeated pairs of transcranial magnetic stimuli (TMS) and maximal motor nerve stimuli, can alter corticospinal transmission to low-threshold motoneurons in the human spinal cord. To determine whether similar changes occur for high-threshold motoneurons, we tested whether maximal voluntary activation and force can be affected by PCMS in healthy individuals. On 2 separate days, healthy participants ( n = 14) performed brief thumb adduction maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) before and after a control protocol (TMS only) or PCMS designed to facilitate corticospinal transmission to adductor pollicis. Peripheral nerve stimulation alone was not performed. During each MVC, a superimposed twitch was elicited by a supramaximal stimulus delivered to the ulnar nerve. With muscles relaxed following the maximal contraction, a similar stimulus elicited a resting twitch. Voluntary activation was calculated as (1 - superimposed twitch/resting twitch) × 100%. Although voluntary activation decreased over time in both conditions, the decrease was less after PCMS (-0.4 ± 4.1%) than after the control protocol (-4.9 ± 4.9%; P = 0.007). This was supported by a greater increase in electromyographic response after PCMS than control (7 ± 13% vs. -3 ± 10%; P = 0.043). However, maximal force was not affected. The findings indicate a modest effect of PCMS on maximal neural drive to adductor pollicis, suggesting that PCMS can affect corticospinal transmission to high-threshold motoneurons. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS) induces changes in the human spinal cord. To date, the reported effects of PCMS have been limited to low-threshold motoneurons and low-force tasks in healthy and spinal cord injured individuals. For the first time, we show that these plastic changes are not limited to lower threshold motoneurons, but occur across the entire motoneuron pool as demonstrated by the increases in voluntary activation and muscle activity during maximal voluntary contractions of adductor pollicis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  maximal voluntary contraction; motoneuron; plasticity; spinal; voluntary activation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29046429     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00919.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  9 in total

1.  The effect of paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation on maximal voluntary elbow flexion in cervical spinal cord injury: an experimental study.

Authors:  Siobhan C Dongés; Claire L Boswell-Ruys; Jane E Butler; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 2.  Targeted-Plasticity in the Corticospinal Tract After Human Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Lasse Christiansen; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  The Potential of Corticospinal-Motoneuronal Plasticity for Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Hang Jin Jo; Michael S A Richardson; Martin Oudega; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2020-08-04

4.  Motor Point Stimulation in Spinal Paired Associative Stimulation can Facilitate Spinal Cord Excitability.

Authors:  Kai Lon Fok; Naotsugu Kaneko; Atsushi Sasaki; Kento Nakagawa; Kimitaka Nakazawa; Kei Masani
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Reliability of Tibialis Anterior Muscle Voluntary Activation Using the Interpolated Twitch Technique and the Central Activation Ratio in People with Stroke.

Authors:  Sharon Olsen; Nada Signal; Imran Khan Niazi; Gemma Alder; Usman Rashid; Rasmus Bach Nedergaard; Denise Taylor
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 6.  Paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation and exercise after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Hang Jin Jo; Michael S A Richardson; Martin Oudega; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Posteroanterior Cervical Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation: Interactions with Cortical and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Jaclyn R Wecht; William M Savage; Grace O Famodimu; Gregory A Mendez; Jonah M Levine; Matthew T Maher; Joseph P Weir; Jill M Wecht; Jason B Carmel; Yu-Kuang Wu; Noam Y Harel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Acute intermittent hypoxia boosts spinal plasticity in humans with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Lasse Christiansen; Bing Chen; Yuming Lei; M A Urbin; Michael S A Richardson; Martin Oudega; Milap Sandhu; W Zev Rymer; Randy D Trumbower; Gordon S Mitchell; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 5.620

9.  Neurophysiological Changes After Paired Brain and Spinal Cord Stimulation Coupled With Locomotor Training in Human Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Timothy S Pulverenti; Morad Zaaya; Monika Grabowski; Ewelina Grabowski; Md Anamul Islam; Jeffrey Li; Lynda M Murray; Maria Knikou
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.003

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.