Literature DB >> 29046242

Preoperative corrections are required for planning of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Yohei Okada1, Atsushi Teramoto2, Tomoyuki Suzuki1, Yuichiro Kii1, Kota Watanabe3, Toshihiko Yamashita1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) is attracting attention as a mechanical method of ensuring the accuracy of osteotomy during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Few studies have focused on preoperative plans; thus, it is unclear how often initial plans have to be corrected preoperatively and intraoperatively. We investigated the frequency of corrections, the accuracy of intraoperative osteotomy, and postoperative alignment.
METHODS: We analyzed 45 knees of 40 patients who underwent TKA using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based PSI. We evaluated the frequency of corrections to preoperative plans and intraoperative corrections for each part. We also evaluated osteotomy error, defined as the difference between the planned and actual thickness of resected bone. Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral component angle (FCA), and tibial component angle (TCA) on plain X-rays were evaluated for postoperative alignment.
RESULTS: Corrections were made to the initial plans in 91.1% of cases with a mean of 3.3 corrections per knee. Intraoperative corrections were made in 57.8% of cases, with a mean of 0.6 corrections per knee. Mean absolute osteotomy error was around one millimeter, and values were within two millimeters over 80% of cases on most parts except the proximal lateral tibia. In terms of postoperative alignment, HKA was 178.5±1.7°, FCA was 89.0±1.6°, and TCA was 89.4±1.9°. Proportions of outliers were 11.1%, 15.6%, and 20.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the cases required preoperative corrections for planning of PSI. PSI may be useful for ensuring the accuracy of osteotomy and postoperative alignment.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alignment accuracy; Patient-specific instrument; Preoperative correction; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29046242     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  5 in total

1.  Significant differences between manufacturer and surgeon in the accuracy of final component size prediction with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Davide Cucchi; Alessandra Menon; Riccardo Compagnoni; Paolo Ferrua; Chiara Fossati; Pietro Randelli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Clinical Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using Patient-Specific Cutting Guides.

Authors:  Murat Çalbıyık
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-12-29

3.  Health costs and efficiencies of patient-specific and single-use instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Andre Attard; Gwenllian Fflur Tawy; Michiel Simons; Philip Riches; Philip Rowe; Leela C Biant
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-05-29

4.  The Bony Resection Accuracy with Patient-Specific Instruments during Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series Study.

Authors:  Liang Yuan; Bin Yang; Xiaohua Wang; Bin Sun; Ke Zhang; Yichen Yan; Jie Liu; Jie Yao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Artificial Intelligence Based Patient-Specific Preoperative Planning Algorithm for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adriaan Lambrechts; Roel Wirix-Speetjens; Frederik Maes; Sabine Van Huffel
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-03-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.