Kate Hanneman1, Andrew M Crean1,2, Bernd J Wintersperger1, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan1,2, Elsie T Nguyen1, Camilla Kayedpour2, Rachel M Wald1,2. 1. Department of Medical Imaging, Peter Munk Cardiac Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Avenue, 1PMB-298, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2N2, Canada. 2. Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
Aims: Our aims were to explore cardiac magnetic resonance quantification of myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) when compared with healthy controls and to investigate the association between ECV and major adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Methods and results: We prospectively recruited adults with rTOF (n = 44, 59% male, 32.9 ± 13.6 years) and evaluated right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) ECV by pre/post-gadolinium T1 measurements (modified Look-Locker inversion recovery technique) on a 1.5-T Siemens scanner compared with the healthy controls (n = 10, 50% male, 31.5 ± 4.4 years). The primary end point was a composite of death, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, heart failure (HF) requiring admission for escalation of therapy, or haemodynamically significant ventricular tachycardia (VT) (lasting >30 s and/or resulting in invasive therapy). The association between ECV and adverse events was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models [median follow-up 236 days, interquartile range (IQR) 38-342]. RVECV was higher in patients compared with the controls (31.5 ± 5.4% vs. 26.3 ± 2.1%, P = 0.027). The following major adverse events occurred (n = 9, 21%): death (n = 1), out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n = 1), HF (n = 1), and VT (n = 6). RVECV was higher among those with an adverse event compared to those without (35.0 ± 5.5% vs. 29.6 ± 4.5%, P = 0.014) and was associated with increased risk for adverse events [hazard ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval (1.01-1.28); P = 0.037]. LVECV was not associated with adverse events (P = 0.667). Conclusion: Increased RVECV is associated with adverse cardiovascular events in adults with rTOF. These results may lead to further studies exploring the potential role for RVECV in risk stratification and targeted therapeutic interventions in this population.
Aims: Our aims were to explore cardiac magnetic resonance quantification of myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) when compared with healthy controls and to investigate the association between ECV and major adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Methods and results: We prospectively recruited adults with rTOF (n = 44, 59% male, 32.9 ± 13.6 years) and evaluated right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) ECV by pre/post-gadolinium T1 measurements (modified Look-Locker inversion recovery technique) on a 1.5-T Siemens scanner compared with the healthy controls (n = 10, 50% male, 31.5 ± 4.4 years). The primary end point was a composite of death, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, heart failure (HF) requiring admission for escalation of therapy, or haemodynamically significant ventricular tachycardia (VT) (lasting >30 s and/or resulting in invasive therapy). The association between ECV and adverse events was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models [median follow-up 236 days, interquartile range (IQR) 38-342]. RVECV was higher in patients compared with the controls (31.5 ± 5.4% vs. 26.3 ± 2.1%, P = 0.027). The following major adverse events occurred (n = 9, 21%): death (n = 1), out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n = 1), HF (n = 1), and VT (n = 6). RVECV was higher among those with an adverse event compared to those without (35.0 ± 5.5% vs. 29.6 ± 4.5%, P = 0.014) and was associated with increased risk for adverse events [hazard ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval (1.01-1.28); P = 0.037]. LVECV was not associated with adverse events (P = 0.667). Conclusion: Increased RVECV is associated with adverse cardiovascular events in adults with rTOF. These results may lead to further studies exploring the potential role for RVECV in risk stratification and targeted therapeutic interventions in this population.
Authors: Shobhit Mathur; John G Dreisbach; Gauri R Karur; Robert M Iwanochko; Chantal F Morel; Syed Wasim; Elsie T Nguyen; Bernd J Wintersperger; Kate Hanneman Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Susan M Dusenbery; Jane W Newburger; Steven D Colan; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Annette Baker; Andrew J Powell Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2021-01-18
Authors: Quint A J Hagdorn; Kondababu Kurakula; Anne-Marie C Koop; Guido P L Bossers; Emmanouil Mavrogiannis; Tom van Leusden; Diederik E van der Feen; Rudolf A de Boer; Marie-José T H Goumans; Rolf M F Berger Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 4.566