OBJECTIVE: Evidence of physical function difficulties, such as difficulty rising from a chair, may limit daily walking for people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to identify minimum performance thresholds on clinical tests of physical function predictive to walking ≥6,000 steps/day. This benchmark is known to discriminate people with knee OA who develop functional limitation over time from those who do not. METHODS: Using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, we quantified daily walking as average steps/day from an accelerometer (Actigraph GT1M) worn for ≥10 hours/day over 1 week. Physical function was quantified using 3 performance-based clinical tests: 5 times sit-to-stand test, walking speed (tested over 20 meters), and 400-meter walk test. To identify minimum performance thresholds for daily walking, we calculated physical function values corresponding to high specificity (80-95%) to predict walking ≥6,000 steps/day. RESULTS: Among 1,925 participants (mean ± SD age 65.1 ± 9.1 years, mean ± SD body mass index 28.4 ± 4.8 kg/m2 , and 55% female) with valid accelerometer data, 54.9% walked ≥6,000 steps/day. High specificity thresholds of physical function for walking ≥6,000 steps/day ranged 11.4-14.0 seconds on the 5 times sit-to-stand test, 1.13-1.26 meters/second for walking speed, or 315-349 seconds on the 400-meter walk test. CONCLUSION: Not meeting these minimum performance thresholds on clinical tests of physical function may indicate inadequate physical ability to walk ≥6,000 steps/day for people with knee OA. Rehabilitation may be indicated to address underlying impairments limiting physical function.
OBJECTIVE: Evidence of physical function difficulties, such as difficulty rising from a chair, may limit daily walking for people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to identify minimum performance thresholds on clinical tests of physical function predictive to walking ≥6,000 steps/day. This benchmark is known to discriminate people with knee OA who develop functional limitation over time from those who do not. METHODS: Using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, we quantified daily walking as average steps/day from an accelerometer (Actigraph GT1M) worn for ≥10 hours/day over 1 week. Physical function was quantified using 3 performance-based clinical tests: 5 times sit-to-stand test, walking speed (tested over 20 meters), and 400-meter walk test. To identify minimum performance thresholds for daily walking, we calculated physical function values corresponding to high specificity (80-95%) to predict walking ≥6,000 steps/day. RESULTS: Among 1,925 participants (mean ± SD age 65.1 ± 9.1 years, mean ± SD body mass index 28.4 ± 4.8 kg/m2 , and 55% female) with valid accelerometer data, 54.9% walked ≥6,000 steps/day. High specificity thresholds of physical function for walking ≥6,000 steps/day ranged 11.4-14.0 seconds on the 5 times sit-to-stand test, 1.13-1.26 meters/second for walking speed, or 315-349 seconds on the 400-meter walk test. CONCLUSION: Not meeting these minimum performance thresholds on clinical tests of physical function may indicate inadequate physical ability to walk ≥6,000 steps/day for people with knee OA. Rehabilitation may be indicated to address underlying impairments limiting physical function.
Authors: J M Guralnik; L Ferrucci; C F Pieper; S G Leveille; K S Markides; G V Ostir; S Studenski; L F Berkman; R B Wallace Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Anne Tiedemann; Hiroyuki Shimada; Catherine Sherrington; Susan Murray; Stephen Lord Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2008-05-16 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Matteo Cesari; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Brenda W H J Penninx; Barbara J Nicklas; Eleanor M Simonsick; Anne B Newman; Frances A Tylavsky; Jennifer S Brach; Suzanne Satterfield; Douglas C Bauer; Marjolein Visser; Susan M Rubin; Tamara B Harris; Marco Pahor Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: A A Guccione; D T Felson; J J Anderson; J M Anthony; Y Zhang; P W Wilson; M Kelly-Hayes; P A Wolf; B E Kreger; W B Kannel Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Yves M Rolland; Matteo Cesari; Michael E Miller; Brenda W Penninx; Hal H Atkinson; Marco Pahor Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: H Master; T Neogi; L F Callahan; A E Nelson; M LaValley; R J Cleveland; Y M Golightly; L M Thoma; Y Zhang; D Voinier; M B Christiansen; J T Jakiela; M Nevitt; C E Lewis; L A Frey-Law; D K White Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Matthew S Harkey; Kate L Lapane; Shao-Hsien Liu; Grace H Lo; Timothy E McAlindon; Jeffrey B Driban Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Hiral Master; Tuhina Neogi; Michael LaValley; Louise M Thoma; Yuqing Zhang; Dana Voinier; Meredith B Christiansen; Daniel K White Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Harvi F Hart; Tuhina Neogi; Michael LaValley; Daniel White; Yuqing Zhang; Michael C Nevitt; James Torner; Cora E Lewis; Joshua J Stefanik Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Sandra H Soto; Leigh F Callahan; Stephanie Bahorski; Mary Altpeter; Derek P Hales; Ashley Phillips; Dana Carthron; Christine Rini Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2019-10
Authors: Hiral Master; Louise M Thoma; Dorothy D Dunlop; Meredith B Christiansen; Dana Voinier; Daniel K White Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 5.346
Authors: Kelli Allen; Maihan B Vu; Leigh F Callahan; Rebecca J Cleveland; Abigail L Gilbert; Yvonne M Golightly; Ida Griesemer; Kimberlea Grimm; Derek P Hales; David G Hu; Katie Huffman; Amanda E Nelson; Ami Pathak; Jennifer Rees; Zachary D Rethorn; Anne E Wandishin Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2020-05-16 Impact factor: 2.362