Literature DB >> 29044563

The impact of socioeconomic status on stage specific prostate cancer survival and mortality before and after introduction of PSA test in Finland.

Heikki A Seikkula1,2, Antti J Kaipia3, Heidi Ryynänen4, Karri Seppä4, Janne M Pitkäniemi4,5, Nea K Malila4,6, Peter J Boström2.   

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) has an impact on prostate cancer (PCa) outcomes. Men with high SES have higher incidence and lower mortality of PCa versus lower SES males. PCa cases diagnosed in Finland in 1985-2014 (N = 95,076) were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry. Information on education level (EL) was obtained from Statistics Finland. EL was assessed with three-tiered scale: basic, upper secondary and higher education. PCa stage at diagnosis was defined as localized, metastatic or unknown. Years of diagnosis 1985-1994 were defined as pre-PSA period and thereafter as post-PSA period. We report PCa-specific survival (PCSS) and relative risks (RR) for PCa specific mortality (PCSM) among cancer cases in Finland, where healthcare is 100% publicly reimbursed and inequality in healthcare services low. Men with higher EL had markedly better 10-year PCSS: 68 versus 63% in 1985-1994 and 90 versus 85% in 1995-2004 compared to basic EL in localized PCa. The RR for PCSM among men with localized PCa and higher EL compared to basic EL was 0.76(95%confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.88) in 1985-1994 and 0.61(95%CI 0.53-0.70) in 1995-2004. Variation in PCSS and PCSM between EL categories was evident in metastatic PCa, too. The difference in PCSM between EL categories was larger in the first 10-year post-PSA period than before that but decreased thereafter in localized PCa, suggesting PSA testing became earlier popular among men with high EL. In summary, higher SES/EL benefit PCa survival both in local and disseminated disease and the effect of EL was more pronounced in early post-PSA period.
© 2017 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer-specific survival; other-cause mortality; prostate cancer; prostate cancer specific mortality; socioeconomic status

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29044563     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  4 in total

1.  Disadvantageous Socioeconomic Position at Specific Life Periods May Contribute to Prostate Cancer Risk and Aggressiveness.

Authors:  Sreenath Madathil; Christine Blaser; Belinda Nicolau; Hugues Richard; Marie-Élise Parent
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Prognostic values of the core components of the mammalian circadian clock in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wenchang Yue; Xiao Du; Xuhong Wang; Niu Gui; Weijie Zhang; Jiale Sun; Jiawei You; Dong He; Xinyu Geng; Yuhua Huang; Jianquan Hou
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  An analysis of time trends in breast and prostate cancer mortality rates in Lithuania, 1986-2020.

Authors:  Rūta Everatt; Daiva Gudavičienė
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.135

4.  Development of an autophagy-related gene expression signature for prognosis prediction in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Daixing Hu; Li Jiang; Shengjun Luo; Xin Zhao; Hao Hu; Guozhi Zhao; Wei Tang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 5.531

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.