Chris J Packard1, Robin Young2, Kevin Ross2, Ian Ford2, Baishali M Ambegaonkar3, Philippe Brudi3, Colin McCowan2. 1. College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, McGregor Building, Room 203, Floor 2, Western Infirmary, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. 2. Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. 3. Merck, Sharpe & Dohme Ltd, 2000 Galloping Hill Rd, Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA.
Abstract
Aims: Cumulative coronary heart disease (CHD) events over 20 years were examined in men screened for, and in those randomized to, the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Methods and results: Record linkage provided CHD-related events and days in hospital for the 80 230 screenees, including the randomized cohort of 6595 men. Risk factors were determined at baseline, and disease burden assessed for groups defined by cholesterol. Effects of cholesterol lowering were modelled from differences between groups, and from the treatment arms of the trial. Over 20 years, those without a history of CHD (n = 61 211) had 23.0 events per 100 subjects in the lowest cholesterol group (mean 4.0 mmol/L) and 65.1 per 100 in the highest (8.8 mmol/L). Corresponding days in hospital were 167.2-435.4 per 100 subjects. Analogous figures for men with a CHD history (n = 8570) were 77.3-141.7 events per 100 and 526.1-936.7 hospital days per 100. Lowering cholesterol by about 1.0 mmol/L in men with average cholesterol and no CHD was predicted to be associated with 8.9 fewer events and a saving of 56.0 hospital days per 100. In those with CHD this difference gave, depending on starting level, 26.8-36.5 fewer events and savings of 158.2-247.3 hospital days per 100 subjects. Comparison of cumulative events in 45-54 vs. 55-64 year olds in the trial revealed greater benefit from intervention in the younger decade. Conclusion: Long-term, longitudinal data reveal the considerable CHD burden in middle-aged men and indicate substantial clinical benefits from both moderate and aggressive cholesterol lowering. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Aims: Cumulative coronary heart disease (CHD) events over 20 years were examined in men screened for, and in those randomized to, the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Methods and results: Record linkage provided CHD-related events and days in hospital for the 80 230 screenees, including the randomized cohort of 6595 men. Risk factors were determined at baseline, and disease burden assessed for groups defined by cholesterol. Effects of cholesterol lowering were modelled from differences between groups, and from the treatment arms of the trial. Over 20 years, those without a history of CHD (n = 61 211) had 23.0 events per 100 subjects in the lowest cholesterol group (mean 4.0 mmol/L) and 65.1 per 100 in the highest (8.8 mmol/L). Corresponding days in hospital were 167.2-435.4 per 100 subjects. Analogous figures for men with a CHD history (n = 8570) were 77.3-141.7 events per 100 and 526.1-936.7 hospital days per 100. Lowering cholesterol by about 1.0 mmol/L in men with average cholesterol and no CHD was predicted to be associated with 8.9 fewer events and a saving of 56.0 hospital days per 100. In those with CHD this difference gave, depending on starting level, 26.8-36.5 fewer events and savings of 158.2-247.3 hospital days per 100 subjects. Comparison of cumulative events in 45-54 vs. 55-64 year olds in the trial revealed greater benefit from intervention in the younger decade. Conclusion: Long-term, longitudinal data reveal the considerable CHD burden in middle-aged men and indicate substantial clinical benefits from both moderate and aggressive cholesterol lowering. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Alberico L Catapano; Ian Graham; Guy De Backer; Olov Wiklund; M John Chapman; Heinz Drexel; Arno W Hoes; Catriona S Jennings; Ulf Landmesser; Terje R Pedersen; Željko Reiner; Gabriele Riccardi; Marja-Riita Taskinen; Lale Tokgozoglu; W M Monique Verschuren; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; David A Wood; Jose Luis Zamorano Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Timo E Strandberg; Kalevi Pyörälä; Thomas J Cook; Lars Wilhelmsen; Ole Faergeman; Gudmundur Thorgeirsson; Terje R Pedersen; John Kjekshus Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Aug 28-Sep 3 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Salim Yusuf; Eva Lonn; Prem Pais; Jackie Bosch; Patricio López-Jaramillo; Jun Zhu; Denis Xavier; Alvaro Avezum; Lawrence A Leiter; Leopoldo S Piegas; Alexander Parkhomenko; Matyas Keltai; Katalin Keltai; Karen Sliwa; Irina Chazova; Ron J G Peters; Claes Held; Khalid Yusoff; Basil S Lewis; Petr Jansky; Kamlesh Khunti; William D Toff; Christopher M Reid; John Varigos; Jose L Accini; Robert McKelvie; Janice Pogue; Hyejung Jung; Lisheng Liu; Rafael Diaz; Antonio Dans; Gilles Dagenais Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-04-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Shepherd; S M Cobbe; I Ford; C G Isles; A R Lorimer; P W MacFarlane; J H McKillop; C J Packard Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1995-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C Baigent; L Blackwell; J Emberson; L E Holland; C Reith; N Bhala; R Peto; E H Barnes; A Keech; J Simes; R Collins Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 79.321