Samar Sheriff1, Hassan J Zawahrah2, Lenisa V Chang3, Sonay Beyatli4, Haithem M Elhadi Babiker1, Ashton L Roach1, Natalyia Biskup1, John A van Aalst5. 1. Division of Plastic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MCL # 2020, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. 2. Jordan University of Science and Technology, Al-Rumtha, Irbid, 22110, Jordan. 3. Department of Economics, University of Cincinnati, 2925 Campus Green Dr, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA. 4. Acibadem University School of Medicine, Kerem Aydinlar Kampusu, Kayisdagi Caddesi No:32, 34752, Atasehir, Istanbul, Turkey. 5. Division of Plastic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MCL # 2020, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. john.vanaalst@cchmc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This project explores the costs of cleft lip and/or palate surgeries in Palestine and Sudan, two low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), in the Middle East. Our purpose is to examine the veracity of advertisements from international cleft organizations claiming that "250 US dollars (USD) covers the cost of a single cleft surgery." We hypothesize that the actual cost of surgery is greater than 250 USD. METHODS: Costs for each cleft surgery were organized broadly into 5 categories: hospital charges, personnel (time and money spent for health professionals to travel to LMIC, including lost wages), tests, consumables, and reusables. Each item was priced at market value during the time of data collection. Following itemization of actual costs, we compared the costs per cleft surgery among four surgical practice models: (1) visiting international surgical teams, (2) visiting international surgeon working with local teams, (3) local teams working at government hospitals, and (4) local teams working at private hospitals. RESULTS: Our results suggest that 250 USD is an underestimate of actual costs per cleft surgery in all models. The most expensive model in both Palestine and Sudan was the first model, visiting international teams performing all team functions; the cheapest surgical model in both countries was a local team working at government hospitals. The largest cost for any of these models is travel and lost wages for international team members. Eliminating this single cost (travel) decreases overall cost tremendously, but still does not approach the advertised cost of 250 USD. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that 250 USD underestimates the actual costs to perform a single cleft surgery in Palestine and Sudan. If international cleft organizations are genuinely committed to creating sustainable international cleft programs, they should focus exclusively on training local professionals to perform surgery in hospitals of their own choosing.
BACKGROUND: This project explores the costs of cleft lip and/or palate surgeries in Palestine and Sudan, two low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), in the Middle East. Our purpose is to examine the veracity of advertisements from international cleft organizations claiming that "250 US dollars (USD) covers the cost of a single cleft surgery." We hypothesize that the actual cost of surgery is greater than 250 USD. METHODS: Costs for each cleft surgery were organized broadly into 5 categories: hospital charges, personnel (time and money spent for health professionals to travel to LMIC, including lost wages), tests, consumables, and reusables. Each item was priced at market value during the time of data collection. Following itemization of actual costs, we compared the costs per cleft surgery among four surgical practice models: (1) visiting international surgical teams, (2) visiting international surgeon working with local teams, (3) local teams working at government hospitals, and (4) local teams working at private hospitals. RESULTS: Our results suggest that 250 USD is an underestimate of actual costs per cleft surgery in all models. The most expensive model in both Palestine and Sudan was the first model, visiting international teams performing all team functions; the cheapest surgical model in both countries was a local team working at government hospitals. The largest cost for any of these models is travel and lost wages for international team members. Eliminating this single cost (travel) decreases overall cost tremendously, but still does not approach the advertised cost of 250 USD. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that 250 USD underestimates the actual costs to perform a single cleft surgery in Palestine and Sudan. If international cleft organizations are genuinely committed to creating sustainable international cleft programs, they should focus exclusively on training local professionals to perform surgery in hospitals of their own choosing.
Authors: Mark G Shrime; Blake C Alkire; Caris Grimes; Tiffany E Chao; Dan Poenaru; Stéphane Verguet Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Philipp Kupfer; Megan M Abbott; Shelly Abramowicz; John G Meara; Bonnie L Padwa Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 1.895
Authors: Sheree L Boulet; Scott D Grosse; Margaret A Honein; Adolfo Correa-Villaseñor Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.792