| Literature DB >> 29042593 |
Hengyang Qiao1, Haiqing Sun1, Jianzhu Li1, Huiling Chen1, Chao Xing1, Jun Yang1, Helei Dong2, Jing Wang1, Xunqian Yin1, Ze-Ming Qi3, Feng Shi4,5.
Abstract
Pr(Mg1/2Sn1/2)O3 (PMS) ceramic was prepared through a conventional solid-state reaction method. Crystal structure was investigated through X-ray diffraction (XRD), which certificates that the main phase is PMS with monoclinic P2 1/n1 symmetry. Lattice vibrational modes were obtained through Raman scattering spectroscopy and Fourier transform far-infrared reflection spectroscopy. The Raman spectrum active modes were assigned and illustrated, respectively, and then fitted with Lorentzian function. The four modes within the range of 110-200 cm-1 are derived from the F 2g vibrations (A-site cations), and the other three modes (300-430 cm-1) are derived from the F 2g vibrations (B-site cations).The mode with highest frequency above 650 cm-1 is attributed to A 1g -like mode that corresponds to the symmetric breathing of oxygen octahedral. The far-infrared spectrum with seven infrared active modes was fitted using four-parameter semi-quantum models to calculate intrinsic properties (permittivity and loss). F 2u(2) yielded the greatest contribution to dielectric constant and loss, which is mainly performed as the inverted translational vibration of Pr-MgO6 octahedron.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29042593 PMCID: PMC5645336 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13445-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Observed XRD data (○ marks) and calculated (red line) from Rietveld refinements of Pr(Mg1/2Sn1/2)O3. The inset is the unit cell structure model of Pr(Mg1/2Sn1/2)O3 ceramics.
The Position of Each Element Atom of Pr(Mg1/2Sn1/2)O3 ceramics.
| Atom | Site | x | y | z | Ion | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pr | 4e | 0.4859 | 0.5535 | 0.2502 | Pr3+ | 1 |
| Mg1 | 2c | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | Mg2+ | 0.94 |
| Mg2 | 2d | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | Mg2+ | 0.06 |
| Sn1 | 2d | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | Sn4+ | 0.94 |
| Sn2 | 2c | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | Sn4+ | 0.06 |
| O1 | 4e | 0.298 | 0.295 | 0.05 | O2− | 1 |
| O2 | 4e | 0.199 | 0.808 | 0.061 | O2− | 1 |
| O3 | 4e | 0.606 | −0.032 | 0.257 | O2− | 1 |
Figure 2Schematic presentation of the correlation between tilt angles and A-site ionic radii (α1 > α2 > α3 = 0 r1 < r2 < r3)[22].
Crystallographic Data of Pr(Mg1/2Sn1/2)O3 Derived from Rietveld Refinement of XRD Data.
| Formula | Pr(Mg1/2Sn1/2)O3 |
|---|---|
| Crystal system | Monoclinic |
| Space group |
|
| a (Å) | 5.5713191 |
| b (Å) | 5.7226529 |
| c (Å) | 7.9533907 |
| Cell volume (Å3) | 253.57549 |
| Z | 4 |
| Software | Topas3 |
| Radiation | Cu |
| Temperature (K) | 293 |
| Profile range in degree | 10 ≤ 2 ≤ 80° |
| No. of data points | 5501 |
|
| |
|
| 7.02 |
|
| 10.33 |
|
| 9.01 |
|
| 0.664 |
Figure 3The Raman Spectra of PMS Ceramics in the range 50 cm−1 to 900 cm−1.
Bond length of the Pr(Mg1/2Sn1/2)O3 ceramics.
| Bond type | D-ave(Å) |
|---|---|
| Pr-O | 2.5482 |
| Mg-O | 2.0788 |
| Sn-O | 2.0788 |
| O-O | 2.9510 |
The phonon modes parameters (Frequencies and FWHM values) from Raman spectra.
| Modes | Frequency (cm−1) | FWHM (cm−1) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 F2g(A) | 107.71 | 2.32 |
| 2 | 132.99 | 1.14 |
| 3 | 159.15 | 2.19 |
| 4 | 201.57 | 4.56 |
| 5 F2g(A) | 303.08 | 4.23 |
| 6 | 357.88 | 4.78 |
| 7 | 431.74 | 4.16 |
| 8 F2g(O) | 497.69 | 3.94 |
| 9 A1g(O) | 660.15 | 3.56 |
Figure 4The FT-IR reflection spectrum of Pr(Mg1/2Sn1/2)O3.
Parameters of the IR-Active Modes for the Four-Parameter Model.
| Number | modes | Ωcal (cm−1) | ΩjTO (cm−1) | γjTO (cm−1) | ΩjLO (cm−1) | γjLO (cm−1) | Δεj | tanδj/ω (10−4cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 108 | 114.79 | 17.88 | 115.56 | 12.58 | 0.24 | 0.236 |
| 2 |
| 161 | 176.28 | 80.69 | 199.48 | 11.99 | 4.73 | 8.962 |
| 3 |
| 216 | 206.00 | 21.09 | 220.10 | 46.53 | 0.41 | 0.147 |
| 4 |
| 284 | 281.25 | 39.02 | 299.37 | 42.89 | 1.10 | 0.396 |
| 5 |
| 398 | 387.85 | 68.23 | 411.66 | 35.07 | 2.28 | 0.755 |
| 6 |
| 438 | 417.94 | 41.47 | 506.73 | 49.72 | 0.46 | 0.079 |
| 7 |
| 623 | 606.14 | 54.47 | 665.02 | 36.90 | 0.40 | 0.043 |
ε = 4.10.
Figure 5The real part of dielectric constants ε′(ω) calculated from K-K analysis for the Pr(Mg1/2Sn1/2)O3 ceramics.
Figure 6The imaginary part of dielectric constants ε′′(ω) calculated from K-K analysis for the Pr(Mg1/2Sn1/2)O3 ceramics.