| Literature DB >> 29042559 |
He Huang1, Johannes Raith1, Stephen V Kershaw1, Sergii Kalytchuk2, Ondrej Tomanec2, Lihong Jing3, Andrei S Susha1, Radek Zboril2, Andrey L Rogach4.
Abstract
Metal halide perovskite nanocrystals are promising materials for a diverse range of apEntities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29042559 PMCID: PMC5715004 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00929-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Optical absorption and photoluminescence spectra of the samples. Optical absorption (a, b, c) and photoluminescence (PL) spectra (d, e, f) of CH3NH3PbBr3 NCs. Samples were synthesized at room temperature (RT) (a, d) and at 60 oC (b, e) with a varying amount of precursors and a fixed amount of ligands (5 μL oleylamine—OLA/50 μL oleic acid—OA). c, f show the spectra for the RT synthesis with the fixed amount of precursors (1×) but with varying amount of ligands
Fig. 2Structural and compositional analysis of CH3NH3PbBr3 NCs. a TEM overview image of CH3NH3PbBr3 NCs (scale bar, 100 nm) and b HRTEM image of selected larger CH3NH3PbBr3 NCs (1×) synthesized at room temperature (scale bar, 10 nm). c HAADF image and d–f corresponding elemental mapping of Pb and Br in CH3NH3PbBr3 NCs (scale bar, 20 nm)
Fig. 3Time-resolved photoluminescence decays of the samples. Time-resolved photoluminescence (PL) decays (symbols) and their biexponential fits (solid lines) for CH3NH3PbBr3 NCs synthesized at room temperature are shown for different relative concentrations of the precursors, as indicated. Inset illustrates the trends of radiative (τ r) and nonradiative (τ nr) recombination lifetimes as a function of the relative precursor concentration; connecting lines are just a guide for the eye
Fig. 4Formation process model adopted for the discussion of perovskite nanocrystal (NC) growth: Variation of the precursor concentration with time (a.u.) for four different cases (1–4). Upper frame shows positions of PL spectra for the perovskite NCs characteristic for certain discussed cases, indicated by vertical dashed lines. In the first case, the concentration of the precursors is too low (0.01×) for any nucleation process. In the second case, the precursors’ concentration (0.33×) is not yet high enough to allow for much growth of the NCs after nucleation, but will be sufficient for the formation of small NCs. In the third case, with more precursors available in the reaction mixture (1×), the probability of the formation of larger perovskite micro-particles becomes higher. There are two competing processes: nucleation with and without further growth, while the formation of larger NCs for higher precursor concentrations is more likely to happen, and the amount of the non-NC precipitate is increased. In the fourth case, at the highest employed precursor concentration (2.33×), the nucleation and growth always happen until the excess concentration of the precursor falls to a low enough level