| Literature DB >> 29039799 |
Graziella Tocco1, Gloria Zedda2, Mariano Casu3, Gabriella Simbula4, Michela Begala5.
Abstract
New 1-[1-(1H-indol-3-yl) alkyl]-1H-indoles, surprisingly, have been obtained from the addition of indole to a variety of aldehydes under neat conditions. CaO, present in excess, was fundamental for carrying out the reaction with paraformaldehyde. Under the same reaction conditions, aromatic and heteroaromatic aldehydes afforded only classical bis (indolyl) aryl indoles. In this paper, the role of CaO, together with the regiochemistry and the mechanism of the reaction, are discussed in detail. The effect of some selected 3,3'- and 1,3'-diindolyl methane derivatives on cell proliferation of the hepatoma cell line FaO was also evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: 1-[1-(1H-indol-3-yl) alkyl]-1H-indoles; cytotoxicity; hepatocarcinoma; solvent-free reaction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29039799 PMCID: PMC6151463 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22101747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Reaction between indole 1 and aliphatic aldehydes 2.
Scheme 2Reaction between indole 1 and formaldehyde 2a.
Figure 1Gas chromatogram (GC) and mass spectra of compounds 3a, 4a and 5.
Base effect on reaction between indole 1 and formaldehyde 2a at 100 °C.
| Entry | Base | Base/(1) | Time (h) | Yields (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3a | 4a | ||||
| 1 | - | - | 6 | N.I. a | N.I. a |
| 2 | CaO | 0.1/1 | 6 | N.I. a | N.I. a |
| 3 | CaO | 1/1 | 6 | 50 | 8 |
| 4 | CaO | 17/1 | 3 | 65 | 25 |
| 5 | CaO b | 17/1 | 3 | N.I. a | 62 |
| 6 | KOH | 1/1 | 1.5 | 61 | 37 |
a Not Isolated. GC yields; b DMSO was used as solvent.
Scheme 3Investigation of the role of indole-1-carbinol 5 in the formation of compounds 3a and 4a.
Reaction of indole 1 with aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes. a
| Entry | Substrate | Base | Time (h) | Products | Yields (%) [ref.] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | ||||
| 1 | CH3CH2CHO | CaO | 5 | 5 | N.I. b | ||
| 2 | CH3CH2CHO | - | 3.5 | 57 [ | 38 | ||
| 3 | CH3(CH2)4CHO | - | 3.5 | 43 [ | 34 | ||
| 4 | CH3(CH2)5CHO | - | 3.5 | 45 [ | 22 | ||
| 5 | CH3(CH2)10CHO | - | 3.5 | 10 | 5 | ||
| 6 | - | 3.5 | - | 70 [ | - | ||
| 7 | - | 3.5 | - | 50 [ | - | ||
| 8 | CaO | 5 | - | N.I. b | - | ||
| 9 | - | 3.5 | - | 10 [ | - | ||
| 10 | - | 3.5 | - | 5 [ | - | ||
| 11 | - | 3.5 | - | 70 [ | - | ||
| 12 | - | 3.5 | - | N.I. b [ | - | ||
| 13 | - | 3.5 | - | N.I.b [ | - | ||
| 14 | - | 3.5 | - | 5 [ | - | ||
| 15 | - | 3.5 | - | 73 [ | - | ||
| 16 | - | 3.5 | - | 88 [ | - | ||
a Operative temperature: 100 °C. All the reactions did not occur at room temperature; b Not Isolated. GC yields.
Scheme 4Proposed reaction mechanism.
Figure 2Electron-impact mass spectrometry (EI-MS) spectra of compounds 4b and 3b.
Figure 3Effect of 400 µM I3C and increasing concentrations of the indole derivatives (A) 3a, 4a and (B) 3b, 4b on FaO cell viability, determined by neutral red uptake (NRU) assay after 24 h of treatment. Data are expressed as percentage of viable cells assessed by neutral red.