Literature DB >> 2903891

Radiosensitive human tumour cell lines may not be recovery deficient.

J H Peacock1, A M Cassoni, T J McMillan, G G Steel.   

Abstract

Split-dose studies have been performed on four human tumour cell lines of widely differing radiosensitivity in order to characterize the relationship between cellular recovery and radiation dose. Previous studies using the split-dose experiment have usually measured recovery at a single dose level and assumed an underlying multi-target model of radiation effect. This predicts that the recovery ratio should reach a plateau when the dose used per fraction is beyond the shoulder of the acute survival curve. In contrast, the linear-quadratic model predicts that the recovery ratio will increase steeply as a function of dose and will never reach a plateau. Our results show that recovery increases with increasing dose and therefore no single value of the recovery ratio can be used for comparative purposes. Using these data, we have derived a value for the beta-component of the linear-quadratic model that is independent of alpha. In addition we propose that the beta-parameter derived in this way provides the most satisfactory basis for intercomparison of cellular recovery between cell lines of differing radiosensitivity. Cellular recovery at any given dose was greatest in the most radiosensitive cell line, suggesting that increased radiosensitivity does not result from decreased recovery capacity. The results suggest that cells with steep acute radiation survival curves and which show little split-dose recovery may not be recovery deficient. Consequently, using such cells in attempts to correlate recovery with the underlying molecular processes of radiation damage repair could lead to misleading results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2903891     DOI: 10.1080/09553008814552341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  5 in total

1.  The intrinsic radiosensitivity and sublethal damage repair capacity of five cervical carcinoma cell lines tested with the 96-well-plate assay.

Authors:  V Rantanen; S Grénman; J Kulmala; R Grénman
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Effects of radiation fractionation on four squamous cell carcinoma lines with dissimilar inherent radiation sensitivity.

Authors:  K Pekkola-Heino; J Kulmala; P Klemi; T Lakkala; K Aitasalo; H Joensuu; R Grenman
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Host cell reactivation of gamma-irradiated adenovirus 5 in human cell lines of varying radiosensitivity.

Authors:  J J Eady; J H Peacock; T J McMillan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  The radiation dose-rate effect in two human neuroblastoma cell lines.

Authors:  A Holmes; T J McMillan; J H Peacock; G G Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  A model of photon cell killing based on the spatio-temporal clustering of DNA damage in higher order chromatin structures.

Authors:  Lisa Herr; Thomas Friedrich; Marco Durante; Michael Scholz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.