| Literature DB >> 29038538 |
Alejandro Ruiz1,2, Alex Frano3,4,5, Nicholas P Breznay3,4, Itamar Kimchi3,6, Toni Helm3,4, Iain Oswald7, Julia Y Chan7, R J Birgeneau3,4, Zahirul Islam8, James G Analytis9,10.
Abstract
Magnetic honeycomb iridates are thought to show strongly spin-anisotropic exchange interactions which, when highly frustrated, lead to an exotic state of matter known as the Kitaev quantum spin liquid. However, in all known examples these materials magnetically order at finite temperatures, the scale of which may imply weak frustration. Here we show that the application of a relatively small magnetic field drives the three-dimensional magnet β-Li2IrO3 from its incommensurate ground state into a quantum correlated paramagnet. Interestingly, this paramagnetic state admixes a zig-zag spin mode analogous to the zig-zag order seen in other Mott-Kitaev compounds. The rapid onset of the field-induced correlated state implies the exchange interactions are delicately balanced, leading to strong frustration and a near degeneracy of different ground states.Materials with a Kitaev spin liquid ground state are sought after as models of quantum phases but candidates so far form either zig-zag or incommensurate magnetic order. Ruiz et al. find a crossover between these states in β-Li2IrO3 under weak magnetic fields, indicating strongly frustrated spin interactions.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29038538 PMCID: PMC5643435 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01071-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1β-Li2IrO3 structure and thermodynamic properties. a 3D projection of a unit cell. The Ir atoms (blue balls) form zig-zag chains stacked along the c-axis and directed alternatingly along the a ± b directions. b Magnetization vs. magnetic field applied along the b-axis, for temperatures up to 60 K. The low temperature data shows a kink at H*. c Heat capacity as a function of temperature for fields up to 4 T. The data shows a triangular anomaly around the transition at T I
Fig. 2Fate of the incommensurate order q = (0.574, 0, 0) under an applied field Hb. a The scattering geometry used during this experiment showing the polarization of the incoming X-ray beam (π-polarized) and the direction of the applied magnetic field (along the b—axis). b The two right panels display all the surveyed positions in reciprocal space at H = 0 T (middle panel) and H > H* (right panel). Black dots denote structural peaks, blue dots represent the field-induced commensurate magnetic peaks ΨV, green dots represent the incommensurate peaks of ΨI, and the red crosses show absent peaks at H > H*. The semicircles represent an inaccessible region below the sample horizon. c Field dependence of the scattering intensity at T = 5 K showing complete suppression at μ 0 H* = 2.8 T. The inset shows that the q—vector remains constant under an applied magnetic field. d Energy dependence of the scattering intensity at T = 5 K for μ 0 H = 0 and 4 T. e Temperature dependence at μ 0 H = 0 T showing the onset of the order parameter at T I = 38 K. The Gaussian fit to the integrated RMXS intensity gives the χ 2 uncertainty shown by the error bars
Fig. 3Field, energy and temperature dependence of the commensurate order q = (0, 0, 0). Field dependence of the scattering intensity taken at T = 5 K and E = 11.215 keV around: a the structurally allowed (2m, 0, 14n + 2m) peaks (e.g. (0, 0, 20)) which show a linear dependence and, b the symmetry disallowed peaks (2m, 0, 12n ± 2 + 6m) (e.g., (0, 0, 10)) which show a quadratic dependence to the applied field. A kink was again observed at μ 0 H* = 2.8 T. The energy dependence for the allowed peaks is shown in the inset c with a dip at the absoption edge E = 11.215 keV. The main panel c shows the difference between the intensity at μ 0 H = 0, 4 T which can be attributed to a magnetic contribution. d Energy dependence of the magnetic peak (2m, 0, 12n ± 2 + 6m) taken at μ 0 H = 0, 4 T. e (0, 0, 10) and (0, 0, 20) peaks widths (a lower bound on the correlation length) remain constant under the applied field, suggesting there is no macroscopic phase separation. f Temperature dependence of the integrated intensities for the (0, 0, 10) at applied fields above and below H*. Above H* the onset of the FIZZ state is continuous, while below H* this onset is cut off by the incommensurate order. The Gaussian fit to the integrated RMXS intensity gives the χ 2 uncertainty shown by the error bars in e, f. g Possible basis vectors describing the magnetic order of β-Li2IrO3, where F corresponds to ferromagnetic order, A to Néel order, C to stripy order and G to zig-zag order
Fig. 4T–H phase diagram of β-Li2IrO3 with field along b-axis. a ΨI and ΨV obey a simple sum rule which suggests that spectral weight is exchanged between these parameters as a function of field. b Schematic representation of the moment direction in the zero field incommensurate (lower, green arrows) and the field induced zig-zag (upper, blue arrows) order projected on the Ir chains (gray) which propagate in the crystallographic a ± b directions (see also Fig. 1a). Note the propagation vector of the incommensurate order is not along the chain, but along the a-axis. c T − H phase diagram constructed by combining the normalized scattering intensity of a commensurate peak (gray scale contours), with the H* and T I extracted from magnetization and heat capacity measurements in Fig. 1 (blue diamonds), and a cusp observed in the field dependence of C p (red dots) (determination of the error bars is described in the caption of Supplementary Fig. 3). Note the parameter ΨV in principle grows as the structure factor and so ΨV ∝