| Literature DB >> 29038522 |
Bryan M Spears1, Martyn N Futter2, Erik Jeppesen3,4, Brian J Huser2, Stephen Ives5,6, Thomas A Davidson3, Rita Adrian7,8, David G Angeler2, Sarah J Burthe5, Laurence Carvalho5, Francis Daunt5, Alena S Gsell8, Dag O Hessen9, Annette B G Janssen10,11, Eleanor B Mackay12, Linda May5, Heather Moorhouse13, Saara Olsen3,4, Martin Søndergaard3,4, Helen Woods5, Stephen J Thackeray12.
Abstract
There is a pressing need to apply stability and resilience theory to environmental management to restore degraded ecosystems effectively and to mitigate the effects of impending environmental change. Lakes represent excellent model case studies in this respect and have been used widely to demonstrate theories of ecological stability and resilience that are needed to underpin preventative management approaches. However, we argue that this approach is not yet fully developed because the pursuit of empirical evidence to underpin such theoretically grounded management continues in the absence of an objective probability framework. This has blurred the lines between intuitive logic (based on the elementary principles of probability) and extensional logic (based on assumption and belief) in this field.Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29038522 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0333-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Ecol Evol ISSN: 2397-334X Impact factor: 15.460