Literature DB >> 29037934

The primary diagnosis and the coexisting anxiety disorders have no impact on the additional surgical procedure after spinal cord stimulators implantation: An analysis of 11,029 patients.

Koji Tamai1, Zorica Buser2, Christopher Wang3, Permsak Paholpak3, Hiroaki Nakamura4, Jeffrey C Wang3, Patrick C Hsieh5.   

Abstract

Studies have demonstrated superior outcomes and cost effectiveness of the spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes such as failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) or complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, little is known about the impact of primary diagnosis or mental disorders on the revision rate. This is the Retrospective cohort study to analyze the reintervention rates based on the primary diagnosis or comorbid mental disorder. Data of the annual trends of SCS use, revision and removal rate of SCS and additional surgical rate after removal was collected and analyzed for patients undergoing SCS between 2007 and 2015, within a private insurance billing database. Trial cases were excluded from this study. The results showed 11,029 patients received SCS implantation with percutaneous electrodes (PE, n = 7418) or surgical electrode (SE, n = 3611). There was a trend of increasing use of SCS from 2007 to 2013, followed by a decrease in last two years. There was no significant difference in the neither removal nor revision rate regardless between the patients with FBSS or CRPS at each time point. Although the removal rates within 2 years were significantly higher in the patients with anxiety disorders compared to the patients without any mental disorders (PE: p < .001, SE: 0.003), the rate of additional surgery after the removal showed no significant difference (PE: p = .532, SE: p = .262). Therefore, we concluded that the primary diagnosis and the presence of anxiety disorders did not have an impact on the additional surgical rate following SCS implantation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety disorders; Complex regional pain syndrome; Failed back surgery syndrome; Paddle type; Percutaneous; Spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29037934     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  1 in total

1.  A Systematic Review of the Cost-Utility of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Persistent Low Back Pain in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.

Authors:  Jesse J McClure; Bhargav D Desai; Leonel Ampie; Wen You; Justin S Smith; Avery L Buchholz
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.