| Literature DB >> 29036882 |
Harrison T Pajovich1, Ipsita A Banerjee2.
Abstract
Fucoidan (Entities:
Keywords: biomineralization; bone; composites; tissue regeneration
Year: 2017 PMID: 29036882 PMCID: PMC5618292 DOI: 10.3390/jfb8030041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Funct Biomater ISSN: 2079-4983
Figure 1SEM images of (a) fucoidan-gelatin (Fuc–Gel); (b) Fuc–Gel–MTNYDEAAMAIASLN (MTN); (c) Fuc–Gel–MTN biomineralized Beta–TCP/nano HaP after 2 weeks of growth; (d) Fuc–Gel–MTN-biomineralized nano HaP after 4 weeks of growth in simulated body fluid (SBF).
Figure 2Comparison of FTIR spectra of each layer of the scaffold in the range of 500 and 3700 cm−1 (F = fucoidan; G = Gelatin).
Figure 3(a) XRD pattern of the dried Fuc–Gel–MTN-biomineralized Beta–TCP/nano HAp after 4 weeks of growth; (b) EDS spectrum of dried Fuc–Gel–MTN-biomineralized β–TCP/nano HAp after 4 weeks of growth.
Figure 4Comparison of TGA curves obtained for composite scaffold (a) Fuc–Gel–MTN before biomineralization and (b) Fuc–Gel–MTN-biomineralized β–TCP/HAp; (c) DSC analysis of Fuc–Gel–MTN before biomineralization and (d) Fuc–Gel–MTN-biomineralized β–TCP/HAp.
Figure 5(a) Force distance curves of Fuc–Gel–MTN-biomineralized β–TCP/nano HAp obtained at 5 different points on the scaffold using peak force microscopy; (b) AFM phase image of Fuc–Gel–MTN-biomineralized β–TCP/HAp.
Figure 6Angular frequency (ω) dependence of storage (G′) and loss modulus (G″) (a) before and (b) after biomineralization of the biocomposite.
Figure 7Percent Cell Viability of MC3T3-E1 cells in the presence of varying amount of scaffolds was carried out over a period of 96 h. Measurements were made after 24, 48 and 96 h using MTT assay. Each bar in the figure represents the mean of three independent studies with standard deviation (SD). Significant difference was analyzed by comparing the viability control with those of cells in the presence of scaffolds. * indicates p < 0.05; ** represents p < 0.01. The p values were determined by student’s t-test.
Figure 8Interactions of MC3T3-E1 cells with Fuc–Gel–MTN-biomineralized β–TCP/HAp matrix showing formation of cell-scaffold matrices (a) in the presence of 20 μg/mL Fuc–Gel-MTN-biomineralized HAp; (b) in the presence of 40 μg/mL Fuc–Gel–MTN-biomineralized β–TCP/HAp. Scale bar for (a) = 30 μm; (b) = 30 μm. Arrows indicate cellular attachments.
Figure 9Organization of actin stress fibers of MC3T3-E1 cells upon interacting with the scaffolds indicating that the scaffold strongly adhered to preosteoblasts in the presence of 20 μg/mL of scaffold (left) and in the presence of 40 μg/mL scaffold (right) Scale bar = 50 μm (left); 30 μm (right).
Figure 10Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was measured in MC3T3-E1 cells before and after incubation with the scaffolds over a period of 21 days. Values are standardized by the total amount of protein in the sample. Results are indicated as standard deviation of three experiments performed in. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, significantly different from control cells.
Figure 11Alizarin S quantification using the assay carried out for MC3T3-E1 cells showing induction of osteogenesis in the presence and absence of different quantities of Fuc–Gel–MTN–beta–TCP/HAP scaffolds. Data are expressed as the mean (n = 3) with error bars indicating standard deviations. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01, significantly different from control cells.
Figure 12Alizarin S staining (a,c) indicating staining and formation of calcium deposits after 7 and 21 days in the presence of 20 μg/mL of scaffold and preosteoblasts; (b,d) indicate staining and formation of calcium deposits after 7 and 21 days in the presence of 20 μg/mL of scaffold and preosteoblasts. Scale bar = 100 μm.