Julien Dumurgier1,2, Bernard J Hanseeuw1, Frances B Hatling1, Kelly A Judge3,4, Aaron P Schultz4, Jasmeer P Chhatwal1, Deborah Blacker5, Reisa A Sperling4, Keith A Johnson3, Bradley T Hyman1, Teresa Gómez-Isla1. 1. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 2. INSERM U942 and Memory Clinical Center, Saint Louis - Lariboisiere - Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, University Paris VII Denis Diderot, Paris, France. 3. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identifying older adults at risk of cognitive decline represents a challenge as Alzheimer's disease (AD) modifying therapies move toward preclinical stages. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between AD biomarkers and subsequent change in cognition in a cohort of cognitively intact older adults. METHODS: 84 cognitively normal subjects (mean age 72.0 years, 59% women) were recruited through the Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and the Harvard Aging Brain Study and followed over 3 years. Measurements of amyloid-β 1-42 (Aβ42), total Tau (t-Tau), and Tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-Tau181) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at study entry were available in all cases. Baseline brain MRI, FDG-PET, and PiB-PET data were available in the majority of participants. Relationship between baseline AD biomarkers and longitudinal change in cognition was assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression and linear mixed models. RESULTS: 14% participants increased their global Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score from 0 to 0.5 during follow-up. A CDR score increase was associated with higher baseline CSF t-Tau and p-Tau181, higher global cortical PiB retention, and lower hippocampal volume. The combination of high CSF t-Tau and low Aβ42 or low hippocampal volume was more strongly related to cognitive outcome than each single biomarker. Higher CSF t-Tau was the only biomarker associated with subsequent decline in MMSE score. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline CSF t-Tau and p-Tau181, in vivo amyloid load, and hippocampal volume were all independently associated with future decline in cognition. The discriminatory ability of these biomarkers to predict risk of cognitive decline, however, was only modest.
BACKGROUND: Identifying older adults at risk of cognitive decline represents a challenge as Alzheimer's disease (AD) modifying therapies move toward preclinical stages. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between AD biomarkers and subsequent change in cognition in a cohort of cognitively intact older adults. METHODS: 84 cognitively normal subjects (mean age 72.0 years, 59% women) were recruited through the Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and the Harvard Aging Brain Study and followed over 3 years. Measurements of amyloid-β 1-42 (Aβ42), total Tau (t-Tau), and Tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-Tau181) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at study entry were available in all cases. Baseline brain MRI, FDG-PET, and PiB-PET data were available in the majority of participants. Relationship between baseline AD biomarkers and longitudinal change in cognition was assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression and linear mixed models. RESULTS: 14% participants increased their global Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score from 0 to 0.5 during follow-up. A CDR score increase was associated with higher baseline CSF t-Tau and p-Tau181, higher global cortical PiB retention, and lower hippocampal volume. The combination of high CSF t-Tau and low Aβ42 or low hippocampal volume was more strongly related to cognitive outcome than each single biomarker. Higher CSF t-Tau was the only biomarker associated with subsequent decline in MMSE score. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline CSF t-Tau and p-Tau181, in vivo amyloid load, and hippocampal volume were all independently associated with future decline in cognition. The discriminatory ability of these biomarkers to predict risk of cognitive decline, however, was only modest.
Authors: Keith A Johnson; Matt Gregas; John A Becker; Catherine Kinnecom; David H Salat; Erin K Moran; Erin E Smith; Jonathan Rosand; Dorene M Rentz; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Julie C Price; Steven T Dekosky; Alan J Fischman; Steven M Greenberg Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Anne M Fagan; Denise Head; Aarti R Shah; Daniel Marcus; Mark Mintun; John C Morris; David M Holtzman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Courtney L Sutphen; Mateusz S Jasielec; Aarti R Shah; Elizabeth M Macy; Chengjie Xiong; Andrei G Vlassenko; Tammie L S Benzinger; Erik E J Stoops; Hugo M J Vanderstichele; Britta Brix; Heather D Darby; Manu L J Vandijck; Jack H Ladenson; John C Morris; David M Holtzman; Anne M Fagan Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Val J Lowe; Stephen D Weigand; Matthew L Senjem; Prashanthi Vemuri; Lennon Jordan; Kejal Kantarci; Bradley Boeve; Clifford R Jack; David Knopman; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: I Skoog; P Davidsson; O Aevarsson; H Vanderstichele; E Vanmechelen; K Blennow Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Bob Olsson; Ronald Lautner; Ulf Andreasson; Annika Öhrfelt; Erik Portelius; Maria Bjerke; Mikko Hölttä; Christoffer Rosén; Caroline Olsson; Gabrielle Strobel; Elizabeth Wu; Kelly Dakin; Max Petzold; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Luis F Maia; Stephan A Kaeser; Julia Reichwald; Marius Lambert; Ulrike Obermüller; Juliane Schelle; Jörg Odenthal; Peter Martus; Matthias Staufenbiel; Mathias Jucker Journal: EMBO Mol Med Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 12.137
Authors: Adam M Staffaroni; Duygu Tosun; Jue Lin; Fanny M Elahi; Kaitlin B Casaletto; Matthew J Wynn; Nihar Patel; John Neuhaus; Samantha M Walters; Elissa S Epel; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Joel H Kramer Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Catherine M Roe; Beau M Ances; Denise Head; Ganesh M Babulal; Sarah H Stout; Elizabeth A Grant; Jason Hassenstab; Chengjie Xiong; David M Holtzman; Tammie L S Benzinger; Suzanne E Schindler; Anne M Fagan; John C Morris Journal: Brain Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: AmanPreet Badhwar; G Peggy McFall; Shraddha Sapkota; Sandra E Black; Howard Chertkow; Simon Duchesne; Mario Masellis; Liang Li; Roger A Dixon; Pierre Bellec Journal: Brain Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Suzanne Craft; Rema Raman; Tiffany W Chow; Michael S Rafii; Chung-Kai Sun; Robert A Rissman; Michael C Donohue; James B Brewer; Cecily Jenkins; Kelly Harless; Devon Gessert; Paul S Aisen Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Erica Howard; David J Irwin; Katya Rascovsky; Naomi Nevler; Sanjana Shellikeri; Thomas F Tropea; Meredith Spindler; Andres Deik; Alice Chen-Plotkin; Andrew Siderowf; Nabila Dahodwala; Daniel Weintraub; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Sanjeev N Vaishnavi; David A Wolk; Dawn Mechanic-Hamilton; James F Morley; John E Duda; Murray Grossman; Katheryn A Q Cousins Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Isabelle Bos; Stephanie J B Vos; Willemijn J Jansen; Rik Vandenberghe; Silvy Gabel; Ainara Estanga; Mirian Ecay-Torres; Jori Tomassen; Anouk den Braber; Alberto Lleó; Isabel Sala; Anders Wallin; Petronella Kettunen; José L Molinuevo; Lorena Rami; Gaël Chetelat; Vincent de la Sayette; Magda Tsolaki; Yvonne Freund-Levi; Peter Johannsen; Gerald P Novak; Inez Ramakers; Frans R Verhey; Pieter Jelle Visser Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Jennifer S Rabin; Taylor E Neal; Hannah E Nierle; Sietske A M Sikkes; Rachel F Buckley; Rebecca E Amariglio; Kathryn V Papp; Dorene M Rentz; Aaron P Schultz; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Trey Hedden Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 4.881