Literature DB >> 29036523

Stress-Dependent Association Between Polygenic Risk for Schizophrenia and Schizotypal Traits in Young Army Recruits.

Alex Hatzimanolis1,2, Dimitrios Avramopoulos3,4, Dan E Arking4, Anna Moes4, Pallav Bhatnagar4, Todd Lencz5,6,7, Anil K Malhotra5,6,7, Stella G Giakoumaki8, Panos Roussos9,10,11,12,13, Nikolaos Smyrnis1, Panos Bitsios14, Nicholas C Stefanis1,2,15.   

Abstract

Schizotypal personality traits may increase proneness to psychosis and likely index familial vulnerability to schizophrenia (SZ), implying shared genetic determinants with SZ. Here, we sought to investigate the contribution of common genetic risk variation for SZ on self-reported schizotypy in 2 ethnically homogeneous cohorts of healthy young males during compulsory military service, enrolled in the Athens Study of Proneness and Incidence of Schizophrenia (ASPIS, N = 875) and the Learning on Genetics of Schizophrenia Spectrum study (LOGOS, N = 690). A follow-up psychometric assessment was performed in a sub-sample of the ASPIS (N = 121), 18 months later at military service completion. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for SZ were derived based on genome-wide association meta-analysis results from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. In the ASPIS, higher PRSSZ significantly associated with lower levels of positive (ie, perceptual distortions), disorganization and paranoid facets of schizotypy, whereas no association with negative (ie, interpersonal) facets was noted. Importantly, longitudinal data analysis in the ASPIS subsample revealed that PRSSZ was inversely associated with positive schizotypy at military induction (stressed condition) but not at follow-up (nonstressed condition), providing evidence for environmental rather than SZ-implicated genetic influences. Moreover, consistent with prior reports, PRSSZ was positively correlated with trait anxiety in the LOGOS and additionally the recruits with higher PRSSZ and trait anxiety exhibited attenuated paranoid ideation. Together, these findings do not support an etiological link between increased polygenic liability for SZ and schizotypy, suggesting that psychosocial stress or trait anxiety may impact schizotypal phenotypic expressions among healthy young adults not genetically predisposed to SZ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29036523      PMCID: PMC5814832          DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbx074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   9.306


  64 in total

1.  Evaluation of psychological risk factors: prospective prediction of psychopathology during basic training.

Authors:  D R Lerew; N B Schmidt; R J Jackson
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Genetic and environmental influences on schizotypy: a community-based twin study.

Authors:  A W MacDonald; M F Pogue-Geile; T T Debski; S Manuck
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Genetic and environmental influences on schizotypy among adolescents in Taiwan: a multivariate twin/sibling analysis.

Authors:  Chaucer C H Lin; Chiu-Hsia Su; Po-Hsiu Kuo; Chuhsing K Hsiao; Wei-Tsuen Soong; Wei J Chen
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Evidence for instrument and family-specific variation of subclinical psychosis dimensions in the general population.

Authors:  M Hanssen; L Krabbendam; M Vollema; P Delespaul; J Van Os
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2006-02

Review 6.  Schizotypy as an organizing framework for social and affective sciences.

Authors:  Alex S Cohen; Christine Mohr; Ulrich Ettinger; Raymond C K Chan; Sohee Park
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Peer victimization as a risk factor for schizotypal personality in childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  Annis Lai-chu Fung; Adrian Raine
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2012-06

8.  Assessing sub-clinical psychosis phenotypes in the general population--a multidimensional approach.

Authors:  Wulf Rössler; Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross; Mario Müller; Stephanie Rodgers; Helene Haker; Michael P Hengartner
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  Affective traits in schizophrenia and schizotypy.

Authors:  William P Horan; Jack J Blanchard; Lee Anna Clark; Michael F Green
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  An Individualized Risk Calculator for Research in Prodromal Psychosis.

Authors:  Tyrone D Cannon; Changhong Yu; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Barbara A Cornblatt; Robert Heinssen; Clark D Jeffries; Daniel H Mathalon; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  14 in total

1.  Magical thinking in individuals with high polygenic risk for schizophrenia but no non-affective psychoses-a general population study.

Authors:  Aino Saarinen; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Jarmo Hietala; Henrik Dobewall; Veikka Lavonius; Olli Raitakari; Mika Kähönen; Elina Sormunen; Terho Lehtimäki; Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 15.992

2.  Coping Strategies Mediate the Effect of Stressful Life Events on Schizotypal Traits and Psychotic Symptoms in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

Authors:  Marco Armando; Corrado Sandini; Maelle Chambaz; Marie Schaer; Maude Schneider; Stephan Eliez
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Molecular Genetic Risk for Psychosis Is Associated With Psychosis Risk Symptoms in a Population-Based UK Cohort: Findings From Generation Scotland.

Authors:  Anna R Docherty; Andrey A Shabalin; Daniel E Adkins; Frank Mann; Robert F Krueger; Silviu-Alin Bacanu; Archie Campbell; Caroline Hayward; David J Porteous; Andrew M McIntosh; Kenneth S Kendler
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 4.  Models of Schizotypy: The Importance of Conceptual Clarity.

Authors:  Phillip Grant; Melissa J Green; Oliver J Mason
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  A systematic review of genome-wide research on psychotic experiences and negative symptom traits: new revelations and implications for psychiatry.

Authors:  Angelica Ronald; Oliver Pain
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Polygenic liability for schizophrenia and childhood adversity influences daily-life emotion dysregulation and psychosis proneness.

Authors:  L-K Pries; B Klingenberg; C Menne-Lothmann; J Decoster; R van Winkel; D Collip; P Delespaul; M De Hert; C Derom; E Thiery; N Jacobs; M Wichers; O Cinar; B D Lin; J J Luykx; B P F Rutten; J van Os; S Guloksuz
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 6.392

7.  Polygenic Risk Scores Shed Light on the Relationship between Schizophrenia and Cognitive Functioning: Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jasmina Mallet; Yann Le Strat; Caroline Dubertret; Philip Gorwood
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Genome-wide analysis of adolescent psychotic-like experiences shows genetic overlap with psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Oliver Pain; Frank Dudbridge; Alastair G Cardno; Daniel Freeman; Yi Lu; Sebastian Lundstrom; Paul Lichtenstein; Angelica Ronald
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 3.568

9.  Examining the independent and joint effects of genomic and exposomic liabilities for schizophrenia across the psychosis spectrum.

Authors:  L-K Pries; G A Dal Ferro; J van Os; P Delespaul; G Kenis; B D Lin; J J Luykx; A L Richards; B Akdede; T Binbay; V Altınyazar; B Yalınçetin; G Gümüş-Akay; B Cihan; H Soygür; H Ulaş; E Şahin Cankurtaran; S Ulusoy Kaymak; M M Mihaljevic; S Andric Petrovic; T Mirjanic; M Bernardo; G Mezquida; S Amoretti; J Bobes; P A Saiz; M Paz García-Portilla; J Sanjuan; E J Aguilar; J L Santos; E Jiménez-López; M Arrojo; A Carracedo; G López; J González-Peñas; M Parellada; N P Maric; C Atbaşoğlu; A Ucok; K Alptekin; M Can Saka; C Arango; M O'Donovan; S Tosato; B P F Rutten; S Guloksuz
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 6.892

10.  What makes the psychosis 'clinical high risk' state risky: psychosis itself or the co-presence of a non-psychotic disorder?

Authors:  Laila Hasmi; Lotta-Katrin Pries; Margreet Ten Have; Ron de Graaf; Saskia van Dorsselaer; Maarten Bak; Gunter Kenis; Alexander Richards; Bochao D Lin; Michael C O'Donovan; Jurjen J Luykx; Bart P F Rutten; Sinan Guloksuz; Jim van Os
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 6.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.