Literature DB >> 29036249

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ixekizumab vs Etanercept and Their Manufacturer-Recommended Dosing Regimens in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis.

Jeremy Udkoff, Lawrence F Eichenfield.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Biologic therapies have revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis; however, their use is limited by costs. Ixekizumab was more effective than etanercept in the UNCOVER trials, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ixekizumab for treating psoriasis. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of these therapies is crucial for medical decision making and our objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of various ixekizumab dosing frequencies compared with etanercept.
METHODS: We utilized published data from the UNCOVER comparative efficacy trials, including transitional probabilities and treatment response rates, to create a Markov model simulating the clinical course and cost-effectiveness of three treatment algorithms for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis over 60-weeks: (1) ixekizumab every 2 weeks for 12 weeks then every 4 weeks, (2) ixekizumab every 4 weeks throughout the treatment period, (3) biweekly etanercept for 12 weeks then once weekly. We utilized a standard willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) and Medicaid drug acquisition costs for our calculations.
RESULTS: Ixekizumab every 4 weeks was $28,681 (USD) less expensive than biweekly etanercept, and $21,375 less expensive, and 0.006 QALY less effective, than ixekizumab every 2 weeks-- a savings of $28.7 and $21.4 million, respectively, per 1,000 patients. A 95.6% cost reduction to $197.83 per dose is required for ixekizumab every 2 weeks to be more cost-effective than every 4 weeks. Biweekly etanercept requires a 29.5% cost reduction ($743.82 per dose) to be competitive with ixekizumab every 4 weeks. DISCUSSION: This cost-effectiveness model utilizes strong input data but is a limited approximation of real-life scenarios. Treatment with ixekizumab every 2 weeks is unlikely to be cost-effective compared with ixekizumab every 4 weeks at current U.S. market prices. Yet, the U.S. FDA approval and manufacturer's recommendation are for ixekizumab every 2 weeks. Accordingly, we suggested selecting biologic therapies using cost-effectiveness analyses. <p><em>J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(10):964-970.</em></p>.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29036249      PMCID: PMC5802402     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol        ISSN: 1545-9616            Impact factor:   2.114


  23 in total

Review 1.  Health economic analyses of psoriasis management: a systematic literature search.

Authors:  Mandy Gutknecht; Magdalene Krensel; Matthias Augustin
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 2.  The psychosocial burden of psoriasis.

Authors:  Alexa B Kimball; Christine Jacobson; Stefan Weiss; Mary G Vreeland; Ying Wu
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 7.403

Review 3.  Candida infections in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis treated with interleukin-17 inhibitors and their practical management.

Authors:  D M Saunte; U Mrowietz; L Puig; C Zachariae
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  Short- and long-term safety outcomes with ixekizumab from 7 clinical trials in psoriasis: Etanercept comparisons and integrated data.

Authors:  Bruce Strober; Craig Leonardi; Kim A Papp; Ulrich Mrowietz; Mamitaro Ohtsuki; Robert Bissonnette; Laura K Ferris; Carle Paul; Mark Lebwohl; Daniel K Braun; Lotus Mallbris; Stefan Wilhelm; Wen Xu; Anders Ljungberg; Nayan Acharya; Kristian Reich
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Economic burden of psoriasis compared to the general population and stratified by disease severity.

Authors:  Andrew P Yu; Jackson Tang; Jipan Xie; Eric Q Wu; Shiraz R Gupta; Yanjun Bao; Parvez M Mulani
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.580

6.  Inflammatory bowel disease among patients with psoriasis treated with ixekizumab: A presentation of adjudicated data from an integrated database of 7 randomized controlled and uncontrolled trials.

Authors:  Kristian Reich; Craig Leonardi; Richard G Langley; Richard B Warren; Hervé Bachelez; Ricardo Romiti; Mamitaro Ohtsuki; Wen Xu; Nayan Acharya; Kathleen Solotkin; Jean-Frederic Colombel; Dana S Hardin
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 11.527

7.  Effect of Ixekizumab Treatment on Work Productivity for Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Analysis of Results From 3 Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trials.

Authors:  April W Armstrong; Charles W Lynde; Sandy R McBride; Mona Ståhle; Emily Edson-Heredia; Baojin Zhu; David Amato; Enkeleida Nikaï; Fan Emily Yang; Kenneth B Gordon
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 10.282

8.  Assessment of health state utilities of controlled and uncontrolled psoriasis and atopic eczema: a population-based study.

Authors:  J Schmitt; M Meurer; M Klon; K D Frick
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis--results of two phase 3 trials.

Authors:  Richard G Langley; Boni E Elewski; Mark Lebwohl; Kristian Reich; Christopher E M Griffiths; Kim Papp; Lluís Puig; Hidemi Nakagawa; Lynda Spelman; Bárður Sigurgeirsson; Enrique Rivas; Tsen-Fang Tsai; Norman Wasel; Stephen Tyring; Thomas Salko; Isabelle Hampele; Marianne Notter; Alexander Karpov; Silvia Helou; Charis Papavassilis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Cost effectiveness of moderate to severe psoriasis therapy with etanercept and ustekinumab in the United States.

Authors:  Reginald Villacorta; Joel W Hay; Andrew Messali
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.