Literature DB >> 29036232

Rare and common variants of APOB and PCSK9 in Korean patients with extremely low low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels.

Chan Joo Lee1,2, Yunbeom Lee3, Sungha Park1,2, Seok-Min Kang1,2, Yangsoo Jang1,2, Ji Hyun Lee4, Sang-Hak Lee1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening of variants, related to lipid metabolism in patients with extreme cholesterol levels, is a tool used to identify targets affecting cardiovascular outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and characteristics of rare and common variants of APOB and PCSK9 in Korean patients with extremely low low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels.
METHODS: Among 13,545 participants enrolled in a cardiovascular genome cohort, 22 subjects, whose LDL-C levels without lipid-lowering agents were ≤1 percentile (48 mg/dL) of Korean population, were analyzed. Two target genes, APOB and PCSK9, were sequenced by targeted next-generation sequencing. Prediction of functional effects was conducted using SIFT, PolyPhen-2, and Mutation Taster, and matched against a public database of variants.
RESULTS: Eight rare variants of the two candidate genes (five in APOB and three in PCSK9) were found in nine subjects. Two subjects had more than two different rare variants of either gene (one subject in APOB and another subject in APOB/PCSK9). Conversely, 12 common variants (nine in APOB and three in PCSK9) were discovered in 21 subjects. Among all variants, six in APOB and three in PCSK9 were novel. Several variants previously reported functional, including c.C277T (p.R93C) and c.G2009A (p.G670E) of PCSK9, were found in our population.
CONCLUSIONS: Rare variants of APOB or PCSK9 were identified in nine of the 22 study patients with extremely low LDL-C levels, whereas most of them had common variants of the two genes. The common novelty of variants suggested polymorphism of the two genes among them. Our results provide rare genetic information associated with this lipid phenotype in East Asian people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29036232      PMCID: PMC5643101          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Individuals with hypobetalipoproteinemia have 30–40% reduction in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, when they are heterozygous.[1-3] Additionally, they can show LDL-C levels <5 percentile or <50 mg/dL without lipid-lowering therapy.[4] In patients with homozygous variants, LDL-C levels are known to be much lower. Although the patients are often asymptomatic, some have increased risk for steatohepatitis.[1,2] This phenotype is associated with variants of APOB or PCSK9. Even common variants of the two genes may affect the levels of LDL-C, although this effect can be modest.[5] In a Canadian database, 120 variants in APOB and 29 variants in PCSK9, with disease-causing potential, have been reported.[6] In affected patients, mutated APOB can induce truncated forms of apolipoprotein B (apoB), which are short enough to be degradated. Mutated PCSK9 causes less degradation of LDL receptors and increases the number of these receptors on the cell, thereby reducing blood levels of LDL-C.[2] Although the reduction in LDL-C by a variant of a specific gene may not be large, its impact on the cardiovascular outcome can be greater than that of the LDL-C level assessed in adulthood.[7,8] Therefore, screening of variants related to lipid metabolism in a population with extreme LDL-C levels can be a tool to identify an important target affecting clinical outcomes. Here, the aim of our study was to examine the prevalence and characteristics of rare and common variants of APOB and PCSK9 underlying the phenotype of hypobetalipoproteinemia in Korean subjects. We used targeted next-generation sequencing, which is becoming widespread in genetic studies.[4]

Materials and methods

Study population

The Institutional Review Board of Severance Hospital approved the study protocols, and all subjects provided written informed consent. Subjects with extremely low levels of LDL-C were included in this study. Between November 2000 and March 2011, 13,545 subjects were enrolled in the Cardiovascular Genome Center Cohort, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Men and women ≥18 years were recruited in this cohort when they visited Severance Hospital for cardiovascular diseases, control of risk factors, or health check-up. Participants were interviewed about their medical histories, and then underwent physical examinations. Among the total number of subjects, 22 subjects, whose LDL-C levels were ≤1 percentile (48 mg/dL) of the general Korean population, were finally analyzed. These 22 subjects were free from hypolipidemic treatment before or after enrollment to our study. This cut-off value is based on the data from 2011 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (https://knhanes.cdc.go.kr/knhanes/eng/index.do). The level of LDL-C was assessed by direct measurement. Individuals with diagnosis of thyroid-, liver-, or kidney disease, pregnancy, cancer, or prescribed regimens that could affect lipid profiles (such as lipid-modifying agents, corticosteroids, or oral estrogen) at the time of blood sampling were excluded.

Laboratory assessment

The levels of total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), and LDL-C were measured in all the subjects. The subjects fasted and avoided alcohol for at least 12 hours before blood sampling. Samples were analyzed within 4 hours by a laboratory that was certified by the Korean Society of Laboratory Medicine. Circulating apoB (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) levels (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) were measured using ELISA assays.

Targeted sequencing and variant analysis

Two target genes were sequenced: APOB (MIM 107730) and PCSK9 (MIM 607786). Genomic DNA was extracted from blood using the QiagenDNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). For mutation analysis, a panel for targeted DNA capture and sequencing was developed by Celemics, Inc. (Seoul, Korea). Targeted sequencing and variant analysis were conducted as described. Briefly, DNA fragments, containing all coding exons and exon-intron junctions, were enriched by solution-based hybridization capture, followed by sequencing using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The quality of next-generation sequencing data including coverage information is presented in S1 Fig. Analysis of sequencing data was performed using an in-house analysis pipeline. Briefly, sequencing reads from the HiSeq 2000 raw data were sorted by index and barcode sequences. Sorted fastq files were aligned to the hg19 reference genome using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA; ver. 0.7.12) BWA-MEM algorithm. Output SAM files were converted into BAM files and sorted using SAMtools (ver. 1.1). Duplicate removal was performed with Picard tools (ver. 1.128) MarkDuplicates. Realignment around known indel sites and Base Quality Score Recalibration (BQSR) were performed using GATK (v3.3.0) to create the final BAM files. Variants were called using the GATK v3.3.0 Unified Genotyper algorithm for loci with sequencing depth greater than or equal to 50X. Analysis of the splice regions, including sufficient intronic bases, was performed using Human Splicing Finder. Functional annotation of genetic variants was performed by ANNOVAR (ver. 2014-11-12). Functional effect predictions for single nucleotide variants were performed using SIFT, PolyPhen-2 and MutationTaster, and matched against the Korean population exome data (n = 476) and public databases of variants (dbSNP 138, Exome Variant Server and 1000 Genome project SNP [April 2012 release] from both Asian and all-population databases). We then prioritized variants according to the following criteria: 1) variants that were reported to be disease-causing in the Human Gene Mutation Database; 2) disruptive variants (nonsense, splice-site [two nucleotides on either side of the intron/exon boundary] and frameshift) that were novel or rare; and 3) novel or rare missense variants that were predicted to be deleterious by SIFT, Polyphen-2 (HumVar), or MutationTaster. Variants that met these criteria were validated by bidirectional Sanger sequencing of PCR amplicons. Databases used for identity and frequency of the variants included 1000 Genomes Project, Exome Sequencing Project 6500, and gnomAD browser (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). Variants were classified as rare when minor allele frequency (MAF) <1%, whereas classified as common when MAF ≥5% in public databases.

Results

Clinical characteristics of study subjects

Clinical characteristics of the study subjects are described in Table 1. Mean patient age was 52 years and 64% of the patients were males; 14% of the subjects had type 2 diabetes for 0 to 27 years; the mean level of LDL-C was 39.2 mg/dL. The patients’ median apoB level was 53 mg/dL (interquartile range: 39–61 mg/dL). This median value was much lower than 90–97 mg/dL, which has been reported in prior studies in healthy Koreans.[9,10] The median PCSK9 level was 251 ng/mL (interquartile range: 190–342 ng/mL) (Table 1). The characteristics of the total cohort are shown in Table A in S1 File.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of study subjects.

VariablesStudy subjects (n = 22)
Age, years52.1 ± 16.3
Male14 (64)
Medical history
    Hypertension12 (55)
    Type 2 diabetes3 (14)
    Current smoker7 (32)
Body mass index, kg/m223.5 ± 2.8
Laboratory values
    Total cholesterol, mg/dL124 ± 21
    TG, mg/dL185 (96,269)
    HDL-C, mg/dL48.3 ± 17.4
    LDL-C, mg/dL39.2 ± 7.1
    Non-HDL-C, mg/dL75 ± 16
    apoB, mg/dL53 (39, 61)
    PCSK9, ng/mL251 (190, 342)

Values are presented as mean ± SD, n (%), or median (interquartile range); TG: triglyceride; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; apoB: apolipoprotein B; PCSK9: proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9.

Values are presented as mean ± SD, n (%), or median (interquartile range); TG: triglyceride; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; apoB: apolipoprotein B; PCSK9: proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9.

Analysis of candidate genes

Eight rare variants (five in APOB and three in PCSK9) of the two candidate genes were identified in nine subjects. Among all the rare variants, five were novel and five were suspected of being disease-causing (Table 2). Two subjects had more than two different rare variants in either gene (one subject in APOB and another subject in APOB/PCSK9). Conversely, 12 common variants (nine in APOB and three in PCSK9) of the two genes were discovered in 21 subjects. Among all the common variants, one in APOB was novel. Five common variants in APOB (e.g., c.C8216T [p.P2739L]) and two in PCSK9 (e.g. c.G2009A [p.G670E]) were frequent and found in more than 10 individuals (Fig 1 and Tables 2 and 3). Three variants of unknown frequency (one in APOB and two in PCSK9) were identified in 10 subjects. One subject did not possess any variants of the two genes. Analysis of the splice regions revealed no variants. The type of variants in non-diabetic and diabetic subjects was analyzed and there was no significant difference therein between the two groups (Table B in S1 File).
Table 2

Genetic variants identified in candidate genes in study subjects.

GeneGenomic coordinateNucleotide changeMutation typeAmino acid change (rs number in dbSNP)Allele frequencyFrequency in gnomAD Database (East Asian)Affected patients (homo/hetero)ReportEffectSIFT/Polyphen/Mutation taster prediction (Clinical significance based on clinVar)
APOBRare variants
chr2: 21,227,212c.G12016Anonsynonymous SNVp.V4006I (rs183117027)0.0450.0060/2Yes*UnknownTolerated/ benign/ disease_causing (Likely benign)
chr2: 21,228,620c.C11120Tnonsynonymous SNVp.A3707V (rs756381590)0.023<0.0010/1NoUnknownTolerated/Benign/ Polymorphism (NA)
chr2: 21,247,843c.C2398Anonsynonymous SNVp.L800M (rs183950016)0.045<0.0010/2NoUnknownTolerated/ possibly damaging/ disease_causing (NA)
chr2: 21,255,236c.G1342Anonsynonymous SNVp.A448T (rs752032737)0.023<0.0010/1NoUnknownTolerated/Benign/ polymorphism (NA)
chr2: 21,266,783c.T35Cnonsynonymous SNVp.L12P (rs758450840)0.068<0.0010/3NoUnknownDeleterious/ benign/ polymorphism (NA)
Common variants
chr2: 21,225,281c.G13013Anonsynonymous SNVp.S4338N (rs1042034)0.2730.2731/10Yes[11]UnknownTolerated/benign/ polymorphism_ automatic (Benign/Likely benign)
chr2: 21,231,387c.A8353Cnonsynonymous SNVp.N2785H (rs2163204)0.0450.0590/2Yes*UnknownTolerated/Benign/ polymorphism (Conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity)
chr2: 21,231,524c.C8216Tnonsynonymous SNVp.P2739L (rs676210)0.3640.7253/10Yes[11]Familial hypercholesterolemia; hypocholesterolemiaDeleterious/probably damaging/ Possibly damaging (Benign/Likely benign)
chr2: 21,232,803c.A6937Gnonsynonymous SNVp.I2313V (rs584542)0.4550.99910/0Yes*UnknownTolerated/Benign/Possibly damaging (Benign)
chr2: 21,235,475c.A4265Gnonsynonymous SNVp.Y1422C (rs568413)0.5451.00012/0NoUnknownTolerated/Benign/Possibly damaging (NA)
chr2: 21,250,914c.C1853Tnonsynonymous SNVp.A618V (rs679899)0.5450.85111/2Yes[11]HypocholesterolemiaTolerated/probably damaging/ Polymorphism_ automatic (Benign/Likely benign)
chr2: 21,252,534c.C1594Tnonsynonymous SNVp.R532W or R505W (rs13306194)0.1590.1350/6Yes(Yilmaz)Familial hypobetalipoproteinemiaDeleterious/probably damaging/ Disease_causing (Likely benign)
chr2: 21,260,084c.C581Tnonsynonymous SNVp.T194M (rs13306198)0.0450.0550/2Yes*UnknownDeleterious/probably damaging/ polymorphism (Likely benign)
chr2: 21,263,900c.C293Tnonsynonymous SNVp.T98I (rs1367117)0.0680.1270/3Yes[11]HypocholesterolemiaTolerated/Benign/ Polymorphism automatic (Benign/Likely benign)
Variants of unknown frequency
chr2: 21,266,774c.35_44TGGCGCTGCframeshift substitutionNA0.136NA0/6NoUnknown
PCSK9Rare variants
chr1: 55,505,520c.G10Anonsynonymous SNVp.V4I (rs186669805)0.0230.0020/1Yes[6,12]HypercholesterolemiaTolerated/Benign/B/ polymorphism (NA)
chr1: 55,509,585c.C277Tnonsynonymous SNVp.R93C (rs151193009)0.0230.0090/1Yes[12,13]HypocholesterolemiaTolerated/probably damaging/D/ polymorphism (Benign)
chr1: 55,524,312c.C1495Tnonsynonymous SNVp.R499C (rs201395805)0.023<0.0010/1NoUnknownTolerated/probably damaging/ polymorphism (NA)
Common variants
chr1: 55,505,668c.C158Tnonsynonymous SNVp.A53V (rs11583680)0.0910.1220/4Yes[13]UnknownTolerated/Benign/ Polymorphism automatic (Benign/Likely benign)
chr1: 55,524,237c.G1420Anonsynonymous SNVp.V474I (rs562556)0.4090.9938/2Yes[6,14]Hypocholesterolemia; familial hypercholesterolemiaTolerated/Benign/ Polymorphism automatic (Benign/Likely benign)
chr1: 55,529,187c.G2009Anonsynonymous SNVp.G670E (rs505151)0.5000.94810/2Yes[6,12,13,15]HypocholesterolemiaTolerated/Benign/ Polymorphism automatic (Benign/Likely benign)
Variants of unknown frequency
chr1: 55,505,552c.42_43insCTGCTGCTGnonframeshift substitutionp.P14delinsPLLL0.091NA0/4NoUnknown
chr1: 55,529,225c.2048dupAframeshift substitutionp.H683fs0.023NA0/1NoUnknown

SNV: single nucleotide variant, NA: not available

*: reported in genomAD browser

Fig 1

Proportion of carriers who had variants of each gene identified in 22 study subjects.

With regard to APOB, seven subjects carried rare heterozygous variants, 17 common homozygous variants, and 14 had common heterozygous variants. Six subjects carried an APOB variant of unknown frequency. Conversely, with regard to PCSK9, three subjects carried rare heterozygous variants, 12 had common homozygous variants, and seven had common heterozygous variants. Five subjects carried PCSK9 variants of unknown frequency.

Table 3

Summary of genetic variants of target genes identified in each individual.

PatientsSexAgeTC (mg/dL)TG (mg/dL)HDL-C (mg/dL)LDL-C (mg/dL)Non-HDL-C (mg/dL)Remnant-C (mg/dL)apoB (mg/dL)PCSK9 (ng/mL)Numbers of variants
APOBPCSK9
RareCommonUnknownRareCommonUnkonwn
1M7289943540541451242341000
2M541461795843884561252040000
3M511232962839955660118111010
4M681343063645985366556141020
5F741282733045985366316040021
6M211362204844884462257030010
7F32116965448621439297040010
8F25105625042551338190040020
9F57130588138491137221161011
10M531122313333794657151050111
11M601361506743692638180000031
12F471142583334814757239140010
13M40142222534589444889060020
14M721203273630845459249030010
15F501532697722765446107000000
16M461452704744985480315030110
17M51971772644712768570020020
18M371371916446732753342010021
19F52120686731532226247151010
20M811131704340703053404121120
21M69711352425472249416010000
22F35149757242773537407060000

TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol

Proportion of carriers who had variants of each gene identified in 22 study subjects.

With regard to APOB, seven subjects carried rare heterozygous variants, 17 common homozygous variants, and 14 had common heterozygous variants. Six subjects carried an APOB variant of unknown frequency. Conversely, with regard to PCSK9, three subjects carried rare heterozygous variants, 12 had common homozygous variants, and seven had common heterozygous variants. Five subjects carried PCSK9 variants of unknown frequency. SNV: single nucleotide variant, NA: not available *: reported in genomAD browser TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol

APOB

Five rare variants of APOB were discovered in seven subjects: c.G12016A (p.V4006I), c.C11120T (p.A370V), c.C2398A (p.L800M), c.G1342A (p.A448T), and c.T35C (p.L12P). All the rare variants were present in heterozygous form. One subject showed three different rare heterozygous variants of APOB, while one subject showed two rare heterozygous variants of APOB and PCSK9. Four of five rare variants were novel, and c.G10216A, c.G2398A, and c.T35C variants were predicted to be damaging. Meanwhile, seven common variants of this gene were found in 19 subjects. Common homozygous variants were identified in 17 subjects, whereas common heterozygous variants were shown in 14 individuals. The C8216T (p.P2739L), c.C1853T (p.A618V), c.A4265G (p.Y1422C), c.G13013A (p.S4338N), and c.A6937G (p.I2313V) variants were relatively frequent and identified in 13, 13, 12, 11, and 10 individuals, respectively. Among the common variants, c.C8216T, c.A6937G, c.A4265G, c.C1853T, c.C1594T (p.R532W), and c.C581T (p.T194M) were suspected to be disease-causing as assessed using in silico analysis. One variant of unknown frequency, c.35_44TGGCGCTGC was identified in six subjects (Fig 1 and Tables 2 and 3; Table C in S1 File). Circulating apoB levels did not show correlations with any specific variants in an individual.

PCSK9

Three rare variants of PCSK9 were found in three subjects: c.G10A (p.V4I), c.C277T (p.R93C), and c.C1495T (p.R499C). All the rare variants were heterozygous. The c.C1495T variant was novel, whereas c.C277T and c.C1495T were predicted to be damaging. Conversely, three common variants were discovered in 17 participants. Common homozygous variants were discovered in 12 subjects, while common heterozygous variants were shown in seven subjects. Among them, c.G2009A (p.G670E) and c.G1420A (p.V474I) were frequent and found in 12 and 10 individuals, respectively. The disease causality of the three common variants of PCSK9 was not certain as assessed by in silico analysis. Two variants of unknown frequency were discovered in 5 individuals: c.42_43insCTGCTGCTG and c.2048dupA (p.H683fs) (Fig 1 and Tables 2 and 3; Table C in S1 File). Circulating PCSK9 levels were not associated with any specific variants in study subjects.

Discussion

In our study population with extremely low LDL-C levels, rare variants of either APOB or PCSK9 were found in nine of all subjects: seven had rare variants in APOB, whereas three showed rare variants in PCSK9. Two subjects had more than two different rare variants of either gene: one in APOB and one in APOB/PCSK9. Most of the study subjects had more than one common variant of the two genes: 19 had variants in APOB and 17 had variants in PCSK9. Eleven of 15 rare or common variants of APOB were novel, while five of six variants of PCSK9 were known. These results provide rare and informative data about variants associated with extremely low levels of LDL-C in East Asian population. In previous studies, the prevalence of APOB mutations in hypobetalipoproteinemia ranged from 44% to 64%.[4,16,17] However, genetic data for this disease in Asian patients has been scarce. The prevalence of rare variants in APOB, detected in our study, was 41%, which indicates a lower tendency than that in Western studies. This rate was higher than the 14% demonstrated in a Japanese study,[18] although it is difficult to compare those results with ours because of the levels of different LDL-C at enrollment. On the other hand, a considerable proportion of subjects with the phenotype did not have rare variants of the two genes. These individuals are probably influenced by the polygenic effects of lipid-related genes. More than 60 rare variants of APOB have been reported in prior studies.[6,17,19] In our study, four of five rare APOB variants identified in the study subjects did not overlap with any of the variants reported previously. The rate of novel rare variants in APOB was greater than that in PCSK9 (80% and 33%, respectively) in our results. Meanwhile, eight of nine common APOB variants were previously identified. Among them, the c.C1594T variant, which was recently reported in a Turkish case, is known to be of much higher minor allele frequency in East Asian population than those of other ethnicities.[20] Four other common APOB variants, c.C293T, c.C1853T, c.C8216T, and c.G13013A, were found in a Dutch study.[11] The LDL-C reducing effect of c.C277T (R93C), a rare variant of PCSK9, has been shown in studies conducted in Japan and Canada.[12,13] We also discovered this variant in one Korean individual with this phenotype. Accordingly, the c.C277T variant may be one of the influential variants in East Asians with very low levels of LDL-C. The c.G10A (p.V4I) variant, another rare variant of PCSK9 found in our study, was also reported in Japan and Canada.[6,12] In the study by Miyake et al, this variant was shown only in subjects with high levels of LDL-C.[12] Conversely, it did not impact the lipid profile in individuals without LDLR mutation,[21] and the function of this variant is not clear to date. Similar to APOB, diverse variants of PCSK9 have been reported, and this gene is also considered highly polymorphic.[13,22] The c.G2009A (p.G670E) variant previously demonstrated in the United States,[15] Canada,[7,13] and Japan,[12] has shown a phenotype similar to that observed in our study. Because this variant was the most frequent among the common variants of PCSK9 in this study, it may have considerable effect in Koreans with extremely low levels of LDL-C. Additionally, the c.C158T (p.A53V) variant, found in our study, has also been reported in a Canadian study.[13] The c.G1420A (p.V474I) variant is the second most frequent among the common variants of PCSK9, as observed in our study. However, it was associated with high levels of LDL-C in a Japanese study,[14] and its biological effect is incompletely proven. Interestingly, in our analysis of the effect of allele number on body mass index, we found a positive association between the number of variant alleles in PCSK9 and the index (r = 0.47, p = 0.03). However, there is controversy on the relationship between PCSK9 and fat accumulation.[23-25] In addition, we compared the triglyceride levels in carriers versus non-carriers of APOB or PCSK9 variants and found that the levels were different with the presence of a few variants. With regard to APOB, the median triglyceride levels were lower in the carriers of c.C1853T (p.A618V) than in the non-carriers (174 mg/dL vs. 264 mg/dL, p = 0.04). Likewise, the levels were lower, but not significantly, in the carriers of c.T35C (p.L12P) (76 mg/dL vs. 206 mg/dL, p = 0.052) or c.C581T (p.T194M) (79 mg/dL vs. 206 mg/dL, p = 0.09) than in the non-carriers. On the contrary, the median triglyceride levels in the carriers of c.G2009A (p.G670E) in PCSK9 tended to be higher than those in the non-carriers (227 mg/dL vs. 116 mg/dL, p = 0.06). Our study has potential limitations. Information on the family history of the study subjects was not sufficiently available. If we could have analyzed the variants by co-segregation or functional tests, it may have provided further insight into their biological effects. In addition, many individuals showed multiple common variants in both genes, and this may cause confusion about their functionality. Although we tried to predict disease-causality of these variants by public analysis tools, we recognized that it was not perfect and was a limitation of our study. As mentioned above, variants such as c.C277T (R93C) found in our subjects and other studies are assumed to have a damaging effect on protein function. However, because the effect of most PCSK9 variants in our study was only predicted by in silico analysis (Table 2), their influence on protein functionality might not be sufficiently understood in our study. We did not compare the prevalence of variants in the total cohort population and that of the study subjects. Such a comparison may have suggested an additional clinical relevance of the variants. At the same time, it was difficult to estimate per-allele LDL-C reduction effects using our data. However, we completed the main purpose of our study, characterizing the variants of the two genes in our population. Conversely, we investigated the genetic background of individuals with extremely low levels of LDL-C, and the subjects with that extreme lipid phenotype were appropriate for the aim of our study. Therefore, the number of people, who met the phenotypic criteria, could not be very large. However, the number of our study subjects was relatively large, compared with those in other studies,[4] particularly studies conducted with respect to Asian ethnicities. Finally, because of the study design and inclusion criteria, the range of LDL-C levels was quite narrow in our study. Thus, it was difficult to obtain statistical significance when we examined the association between a specific variant with the levels of LDL-C within our population. Likewise, it might be hard to find associations between circulating apoB or PCSK9 levels and specific variants in our homogenous subjects that do not have sufficient controls for comparison. Analyses, using co-segregation or comparison with total cohort population mentioned above, would be helpful for such an examination in future studies.

Conclusion

Taken together, rare variants of either APOB or PCSK9 were identified in nine of the 22 study subjects with extremely low LDL-C levels: carriers of rare variants were more frequent for APOB than PCSK9. Most of the study population had common variants in at least one of the two genes. The common novelty of variants suggested polymorphism of the two genes in this phenotype. Our results provide rare genetic information associated with extremely low levels of LDL-C in East Asian people.

NGS data statistics of targeted sequencing.

(A) Blue diamonds indicate the average sequencing depth of the target region. (B) The blue histogram represents the coverage of the target region in each sample. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Clinical characteristics of the total cohort and study subjects (Table A). Variants of APOB and PCSK9 in non-diabetic and diabetic subjects (Table B). Genetic variants of target genes identified in each individual (Table C). (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  25 in total

Review 1.  Monogenic hypocholesterolaemic lipid disorders and apolipoprotein B metabolism.

Authors:  Amanda J Hooper; Frank M van Bockxmeer; John R Burnett
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.250

2.  A spectrum of PCSK9 alleles contributes to plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Authors:  Ingrid K Kotowski; Alexander Pertsemlidis; Amy Luke; Richard S Cooper; Gloria L Vega; Jonathan C Cohen; Helen H Hobbs
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  High frequency of APOB gene mutations causing familial hypobetalipoproteinaemia in patients of Dutch and Spanish descent.

Authors:  S W Fouchier; R R Sankatsing; J Peter; S Castillo; M Pocovi; R Alonso; J J P Kastelein; J C Defesche
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Western Database of Lipid Variants (WDLV): a catalogue of genetic variants in monogenic dyslipidemias.

Authors:  Jennifer Fu; Samantha Kwok; Leah Sinai; Omar Abdel-Razek; Janet Babula; Dennis Chen; Emma Farago; Nigel Fernandopulle; Sean Leith; Melissa Loyzer; Catherine Lu; Niyati Malkani; Nicole Morris; Mandi Schmidt; Randa Stringer; Heather Whitehead; Matthew R Ban; Joseph B Dubé; Adam McIntyre; Christopher T Johansen; Henian Cao; Jian Wang; Robert A Hegele
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Identification of novel APOB mutations by targeted next-generation sequencing for the molecular diagnosis of familial hypobetalipoproteinemia.

Authors:  Antoine Rimbert; Matthieu Pichelin; Simon Lecointe; Marie Marrec; Solena Le Scouarnec; Elias Barrak; Mikael Croyal; Michel Krempf; Hervé Le Marec; Richard Redon; Jean-Jacques Schott; Jocelyne Magré; Bertrand Cariou
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 5.162

6.  Association of lipid and lipoprotein profiles with future development of type 2 diabetes in nondiabetic Korean subjects: a 4-year retrospective, longitudinal study.

Authors:  Mi Hae Seo; Ji Cheol Bae; Se Eun Park; Eun Jung Rhee; Cheol Young Park; Ki Won Oh; Sung Woo Park; Sun Woo Kim; Won-Young Lee
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Genetic variation in APOB, PCSK9, and ANGPTL3 in carriers of pathogenic autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemic mutations with unexpected low LDL-Cl Levels.

Authors:  Roeland Huijgen; Barbara Sjouke; Kelly Vis; Janine S E de Randamie; Joep C Defesche; John J P Kastelein; G Kees Hovingh; Sigrid W Fouchier
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.878

8.  Homozygous familial hypobetalipoproteinemia: A Turkish case carrying a missense mutation in apolipoprotein B.

Authors:  Berna Seker Yilmaz; Neslihan Onenli Mungan; Enza Di Leo; Lucia Magnolo; Lucia Artuso; Isabella Bernardis; Gokhan Tumgor; Deniz Kor; Patrizia Tarugi
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.786

9.  Apolipoprotein B gene mutations and fatty liver in Japanese hypobetalipoproteinemia.

Authors:  Shoji Katsuda; Masa-Aki Kawashiri; Akihiro Inazu; Hayato Tada; Masayuki Tsuchida; Yoshibumi Kaneko; Tsuyoshi Nozue; Atsushi Nohara; Toshihide Okada; Junji Kobayashi; Ichiro Michishita; Hiroshi Mabuchi; Masakazu Yamagishi
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 10.  Update on the molecular biology of dyslipidemias.

Authors:  I Ramasamy
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.786

View more
  4 in total

1.  CETP, LIPC, and SCARB1 variants in individuals with extremely high high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels.

Authors:  Chan Joo Lee; Mun Su Park; Miso Kim; Soo-Jin Ann; Jaeho Lee; Sungha Park; Seok-Min Kang; Yangsoo Jang; Ji Hyun Lee; Sang-Hak Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  PCSK9 Variants in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Comprehensive Synopsis.

Authors:  Qianyun Guo; Xunxun Feng; Yujie Zhou
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 3.  Inclisiran: How Widely and When Should We Use It?

Authors:  Angela Pirillo; Alberico Luigi Catapano
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 5.967

4.  Common and Rare PCSK9 Variants Associated with Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels and the Risk of Diabetes Mellitus: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Authors:  Lung-An Hsu; Ming-Sheng Teng; Semon Wu; Hsin-Hua Chou; Yu-Lin Ko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 6.208

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.