| Literature DB >> 29035322 |
Yan Fan1, Chenglin Zhang2, Wendan Wu3, Wei He4, Li Zhang5, Xiao Ma6.
Abstract
Indigofera pseudotinctoria Mats is an agronomically and economically important perennial legume shrub with a high forage yield, protein content and strong adaptability, which is subject to natural habitat fragmentation and serious human disturbance. Until now, our knowledge of the genetic relationships and intraspecific genetic diversity for its wild collections is still poor, especially at small spatial scales. Here amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) technology was employed for analysis of genetic diversity, differentiation, and structure of 364 genotypes of I. pseudotinctoria from 15 natural locations in Wushan Montain, a highly structured mountain with typical karst landforms in Southwest China. We also tested whether eco-climate factors has affected genetic structure by correlating genetic diversity with habitat features. A total of 515 distinctly scoreable bands were generated, and 324 of them were polymorphic. The polymorphic information content (PIC) ranged from 0.694 to 0.890 with an average of 0.789 per primer pair. On species level, Nei's gene diversity (Hj), the Bayesian genetic diversity index (HB) and the Shannon information index (I) were 0.2465, 0.2363 and 0.3772, respectively. The high differentiation among all sampling sites was detected (FST = 0.2217, GST = 0.1746, G'ST = 0.2060, θB = 0.1844), and instead, gene flow among accessions (Nm = 1.1819) was restricted. The population genetic structure resolved by the UPGMA tree, principal coordinate analysis, and Bayesian-based cluster analyses irrefutably grouped all accessions into two distinct clusters, i.e., lowland and highland groups. The population genetic structure resolved by the UPGMA tree, principal coordinate analysis, and Bayesian-based cluster analyses irrefutably grouped all accessions into two distinct clusters, i.e., lowland and highland groups. This structure pattern may indicate joint effects by the neutral evolution and natural selection. Restricted Nm was observed across all accessions, and genetic barriers were detected between adjacent accessions due to specifically geographical landform.Entities:
Keywords: AFLP; Indigofera pseudotinctoria; genetic diversity; habitat fragmentation; structure pattern
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29035322 PMCID: PMC6151804 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22101734
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Amplification and polymorphism of the PCR products obtained with 6 AFLP primer pairs. Total number of bands (TNB), number of polymorphic bands (NPB), percentage of polymorphic bands (PPB), polymorphic information content (PIC), Nei’s gene diversity (H), Shannon information index (I).
| Primer | TNB | NPB | PPB(%) | PIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E53M55 | 102 | 56 | 54.90% | 0.1690 | 0.2308 | 0.3189 |
| E59M55 | 80 | 49 | 61.25% | 0.3029 | 0.2773 | 0.1998 |
| E76M85 | 81 | 57 | 70.37% | 0.2481 | 0.3980 | 0.2635 |
| E78M85 | 80 | 54 | 67.50% | 0.2341 | 0.3863 | 0.2829 |
| E85M60 | 84 | 57 | 67.86% | 0.2211 | 0.3308 | 0.2826 |
| E86M85 | 88 | 51 | 57.95% | 0.1708 | 0.2949 | 0.3165 |
| Total | 515 | 324 | 62.91% | 0.2243 | 0.4023 | 0.3764 |
| Mean | 85.83 | 54 | 62.91% | 0.2243 | 0.3197 | 0.2774 |
Genetic diversity of 15 Indigofera pseudotinctoria accessions. Accession name (Acc.), number of polymorphic loci (N), percentage of polymorphic loci (PLP), percentage of linkage disequilibrium at the 5% level (LD), observed number of alleles per locus (N), effective number of alleles per locus (N), Nei’s gene diversity index (H), Shannon information index (I), and Bayesian gene diversity index (H).
| Acc. | LD(%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 253 | 78.09 | 10.65 | 1.7809 | 1.4478 | 0.2985 ± 0.0097 | 0.3907 ± 0.0205 | 0.2869 ± 0.0032 |
| B | 282 | 80.74 | 9.01 | 1.8704 | 1.4491 | 0.2992 ± 0.0090 | 0.4130 ± 0.0217 | 0.2816 ± 0.0031 |
| C | 286 | 88.27 | 12.41 | 1.8827 | 1.4036 | 0.2779 ± 0.0092 | 0.3788 ± 0.0199 | 0.2580 ± 0.0032 |
| D | 293 | 90.43 | 5.74 | 1.8889 | 1.4304 | 0.2805 ± 0.0097 | 0.3966 ± 0.0208 | 0.2605 ± 0.0027 |
| E | 296 | 91.36 | 12.52 | 1.9136 | 1.4086 | 0.2563 ± 0.0100 | 0.3818 ± 0.0200 | 0.2482 ± 0.0026 |
| F | 202 | 62.35 | 12.72 | 1.6235 | 1.2874 | 0.2020 ± 0.0102 | 0.2708 ± 0.0142 | 0.1993 ± 0.0031 |
| G | 228 | 70.37 | 14.16 | 1.7037 | 1.3105 | 0.2131 ± 0.0101 | 0.2969 ± 0.0156 | 0.2068 ± 0.0031 |
| H | 235 | 72.53 | 9.70 | 1.7253 | 1.2971 | 0.2039 ± 0.0099 | 0.2899 ± 0.0152 | 0.1997 ± 0.0029 |
| I | 283 | 87.35 | 9.10 | 1.8735 | 1.3707 | 0.2474 ± 0.0097 | 0.3571 ± 0.0187 | 0.2330 ± 0.0030 |
| J | 224 | 69.14 | 10.67 | 1.6914 | 1.3384 | 0.2396 ± 0.0100 | 0.3140 ± 0.0165 | 0.2271 ± 0.0033 |
| K | 239 | 73.77 | 9.17 | 1.7377 | 1.3588 | 0.2360 ± 0.0103 | 0.3282 ± 0.0172 | 0.2278 ± 0.0028 |
| L | 244 | 75.31 | 11.14 | 1.7531 | 1.3622 | 0.2501 ± 0.0099 | 0.3393 ± 0.0178 | 0.2404 ± 0.0031 |
| M | 266 | 82.1 | 9.72 | 1.8210 | 1.3731 | 0.2558 ± 0.0094 | 0.3592 ± 0.0188 | 0.2407 ± 0.0031 |
| N | 237 | 73.15 | 12.01 | 1.7315 | 1.3378 | 0.2288 ± 0.0101 | 0.3188 ± 0.0167 | 0.2250 ± 0.0029 |
| O | 202 | 62.35 | 12.22 | 1.6235 | 1.3037 | 0.2079 ± 0.0105 | 0.2757 ± 0.0145 | 0.2095 ± 0.0031 |
| Total | 324 | 100.00 | 10.73 | 2.0000 | 1.4433 | 0.2986 ± 0.0097 | 0.4291 ± 0.0100 | 0.2895 ± 0.0008 |
| Mean | 251 | 77.15 | 10.73 | 1.7747 | 1.3653 | 0.2465 ± 0.0099 | 0.3407 ± 0.0179 | 0.2362 ± 0.0030 |
Figure 1Cluster analysis of I. pseudotinctoria ((a) unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means) tree for 15 accessions; (b) the relationship between K and ΔK (Delta K); (c) STRUCTURE analysis for 15 accessions when K = 2; (d) STRUCTURE analysis for 364 individuals when K = 2). Two colors represented differently potential genetic compositions.
Figure 2Principle coordinate analysis plot based on AFLP makers for 364 individuals from 15 accessions. The individuals of per accession were represented by the same shapes.
Analysis of molecular variance for I. pseudotinctoria. Degrees of freedom (D.f.), sum of squares (SS), genetic differentiation (F).
| Group | Source of Variance | Sum of Squares | Variance Components | Percentage of Variance (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two clusters (lowland vs. highland) | Between Clusters | 1 | 1120.049 | 11.1906 | 8.98 | |
| Among acc. within Cluster | 13 | 3269.13 | 8.74707 | 16.44 | ||
| Within accessions | 349 | 13844.89 | 39.67018 | 74.57 | ||
| Total | 363 | 18234.07 | 53.19614 | |||
| All accessions | Among accessions | 14 | 4389.178 | 11.29686 | 22.17 | |
| Within accessions | 349 | 13,844.89 | 39.67018 | 77.83 | ||
| Total | 363 | 18,234.07 | 50.96705 |
Comparison of genetic differentiation for I. pseudotinctoria using AFLP markers. Total gene diversity (H), average gene diversity within accessions (H), genetic differentiation coefficient (G, G = (H − H)/H), total Shannon information index (I), average Shannon information index within accessions (I), Shannon’s coefficient of genetic differentiation (G’, G’ = (I − I)/I), gene flow (N) from G (N = (1 − G)/4G). Significance level of LSD at 0.05.
| Variable | All Accessions | Lowland Cluster | Highland Cluster |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2986 | 0.3020 | 0.2384 | |
| 0.2465 | 0.2641a | 0.2142b | |
| 0.1746 | 0.1255 | 0.1015 | |
| 0.4291 | 0.4406 | 0.3796 | |
| 0.3407 | 0.3618a | 0.3223b | |
| 0.2060 | 0.1789 | 0.1511 | |
| 0.2217 | 0.2124 | 0.1491 | |
| 1.1819 | 1.7421 | 2.2128 |
Wright’s F-statistics calculated for accessions of I. pseudotinctoria under different models based on a Bayesian approach. Bayesian genetic differentiation (θB), inbreeding coefficient (f), standard deviation (SD), and deviance information criterion (DIC).
| Model | DIC | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | 2.50% | 97.50% | Mean ± SD | 2.50% | 97.50% | ||
| full model | 0.1899 ± 0.0040 | 0.1397 | 0.2094 | 0.0169 ± 0.0250 | 0.0140 | 0.1279 | 19,432.7 |
| 0.1844 ± 0.0022 | 0.1388 | 0.1941 | 0 | - | - | 19,375.6 | |
| 0 | - | - | 0.3587 ± 0.2889 | 0.0316 | 0.2821 | 39,248.4 | |
| free model | 0.1997 ± 0.0123 | 0.1645 | 0.2103 | 0.3987 ± 0.2889 | 0.0254 | 0.9721 | 20,836.1 |
Figure 3Genetic barriers predicted by BARRIER software (version 2.2, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA). Lines a, b, and c indicated genetic barriers.
The pairwise values of F (below diagonal) and N (above diagonal) of I. pseudotinctoria accessions.
| Accession | acc.A | acc.B | acc.C | acc.D | acc.E | acc.F | acc.G | acc.H | acc.I | acc.J | acc.K | acc.L | acc.M | acc.N | acc.O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| acc.A | - | 3.0701 | 2.0691 | 1.5629 | 0.9053 | 0.6658 | 0.6973 | 0.6995 | 1.0474 | 0.9761 | 1.0126 | 1.0353 | 1.1259 | 0.8398 | 0.8989 |
| acc.B | 0.0753 | - | 3.9659 | 2.4152 | 1.3125 | 0.9144 | 1.0294 | 1.0742 | 1.5964 | 1.4335 | 1.4507 | 1.4909 | 1.5294 | 1.0714 | 1.0777 |
| acc.C | 0.1078 | 0.0593 | - | 9.4025 | 1.9430 | 1.3734 | 1.5460 | 1.5682 | 2.6981 | 2.5749 | 2.4852 | 2.4942 | 2.3705 | 1.3154 | 1.2120 |
| acc.D | 0.1379 | 0.0938 | 0.0259 | - | 3.2319 | 1.5909 | 1.8868 | 1.8633 | 3.3784 | 2.1355 | 1.9742 | 2.0104 | 3.4050 | 1.7580 | 1.4484 |
| acc.E | 0.2164 | 0.1600 | 0.1140 | 0.0718 | - | 4.1670 | 4.4316 | 2.1562 | 3.0833 | 1.7792 | 1.6790 | 1.4837 | 1.9108 | 1.1312 | 1.0190 |
| acc.F | 0.2730 | 0.2147 | 0.154 | 0.1358 | 0.0566 | - | 8.3411 | 2.2550 | 2.4067 | 1.6746 | 1.4438 | 1.2077 | 1.2524 | 0.7835 | 0.7472 |
| acc.G | 0.2639 | 0.1954 | 0.1392 | 0.1170 | 0.0534 | 0.0291 | - | 7.6364 | 4.6138 | 2.0289 | 1.8579 | 1.5306 | 1.5815 | 0.9037 | 0.8116 |
| acc.H | 0.2633 | 0.1888 | 0.1375 | 0.1183 | 0.1039 | 0.0998 | 0.0317 | - | 7.1029 | 1.9683 | 1.7629 | 1.4013 | 1.5499 | 0.8916 | 0.8125 |
| acc.I | 0.1927 | 0.1354 | 0.0848 | 0.0689 | 0.075 | 0.0941 | 0.0514 | 0.0340 | - | 5.5370 | 4.4316 | 2.8828 | 2.9842 | 1.3713 | 1.2232 |
| acc.J | 0.2039 | 0.1485 | 0.0885 | 0.1048 | 0.1232 | 0.1299 | 0.1097 | 0.1127 | 0.0432 | - | 33.5338 | 8.2246 | 2.0563 | 1.0700 | 0.9938 |
| acc.K | 0.1980 | 0.1470 | 0.0914 | 0.1124 | 0.1296 | 0.1476 | 0.1186 | 0.1242 | 0.0534 | 0.0074 | - | 11.7117 | 1.9565 | 1.0353 | 0.9416 |
| acc.L | 0.1945 | 0.1436 | 0.0911 | 0.1106 | 0.1442 | 0.1715 | 0.1404 | 0.1514 | 0.0798 | 0.0295 | 0.0209 | - | 1.8941 | 1.0321 | 0.9166 |
| acc.M | 0.1817 | 0.1405 | 0.0954 | 0.0684 | 0.1157 | 0.1664 | 0.1365 | 0.1389 | 0.0773 | 0.1084 | 0.1133 | 0.1166 | - | 8.7106 | 3.5321 |
| acc.N | 0.2294 | 0.1892 | 0.1597 | 0.1245 | 0.1810 | 0.2419 | 0.2167 | 0.2190 | 0.1542 | 0.1894 | 0.1945 | 0.1950 | 0.0279 | - | 4.6520 |
| acc.O | 0.2176 | 0.1883 | 0.1710 | 0.1472 | 0.1970 | 0.2507 | 0.2355 | 0.2353 | 0.1697 | 0.2010 | 0.2098 | 0.2143 | 0.0661 | 0.0510 | - |
Figure 4Distribution of F values as a function of heterozygosity for interaccessional comparisons. Each dot represents an AFLP locus. The dots in red board are classified as outliers potentially under divergent selection. The dots are classified as neutral loci in gray board and balancing loci in yellow board.
List of the 15 native Indigofera pseudotinctoria accessions sampled for the analysis. Accession name (Acc.), number of individuals (Ind.), elevation (Elev.), longitude E (Long.), latitude N (Lat.), annual mean temperature (Tmean), annual precipitation (P), soil pH value (pH), and soil organic matter (OM).
| Acc. | Ind. | Elev. | Longitude | Latitude | Tmean (°C) | P (mm) | pH | Soil Type | OM (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 23 | 379 | 109°51’21.97” | 31°06’55.85” | 16.042 | 1041 | 7.40 | loess soil | 6.2 |
| B | 26 | 552 | 109°55’40.15” | 31°03’16.74” | 16.142 | 1029 | 7.64 | loess soil | 21.3 |
| C | 23 | 600 | 109°53’20.59” | 30°56’32.75” | 14.733 | 1150 | 7.65 | purple soil | 9.4 |
| D | 24 | 640 | 109°53’49.32” | 30°56’34.47” | 14.733 | 1150 | 7.72 | purple soil | 18.1 |
| E | 30 | 1002 | 109°53’49.30” | 30°56’34.47” | 14.733 | 1150 | 7.30 | purple soil | 14.4 |
| F | 21 | 1612 | 109°55’2.82” | 30°54’50.84” | 14.429 | 1169 | 5.85 | purple soil | 66.3 |
| G | 21 | 1533 | 109°55’0.68” | 30°54’51.78” | 14.429 | 1169 | 7.50 | purple soil | 9.9 |
| H | 24 | 1444 | 109°54’32.72” | 30°55’11.86” | 14.733 | 1150 | 7.91 | purple soil | 45.0 |
| I | 25 | 1336 | 109°54’17.56” | 30°55’27.16” | 14.733 | 1150 | 5.83 | purple soil | 13.9 |
| J | 19 | 1212 | 109°53’50.89” | 30°55’39.22” | 14.733 | 1150 | 7.66 | purple soil | 15.6 |
| K | 29 | 1071 | 109°53’17.98” | 30°55’23.87” | 14.733 | 1150 | 7.85 | purple soil | 10.5 |
| L | 26 | 1018 | 109°53’45.56” | 30°55’56.45” | 14.733 | 1150 | 7.16 | purple soil | 10.6 |
| M | 25 | 913 | 109°53’38.58” | 30°55’57.98” | 14.733 | 1150 | 7.57 | purple soil | 10.6 |
| N | 27 | 778 | 109°53’51.79” | 30°56’21.01” | 14.733 | 1150 | 7.53 | purple soil | 13.4 |
| O | 21 | 311 | 109°51’13.92” | 31°07’3.41” | 17.442 | 960 | 7.20 | loess soil | 15.9 |
Figure 5The sampling sites of 15 I. pseudotinctoria accessions in Wushan Mountains at Southwest China.